blownsi
Super Member
Whoa! sorry if I wasn't clear on that. I'm keeping the ones I record to CD-R and selling the Original MOFI and DCC's.

Whoa! sorry if I wasn't clear on that. I'm keeping the ones I record to CD-R and selling the Original MOFI and DCC's.

I can't tell one cent from one brand to another
Agreed, but scolding someone on the internet for it is about like scolding them for driving above the speed limit.
Wait 5, or better 10 years. Then try again.
I'm not sure if I do, to be honest.I don't know if the OP was talking about sound quality or longevity. I used to use TDK music CD-R's which are no longer available. I switched to MAM-A and can't tell any difference in sound quality.
People have been burning CD's for well over 20 years now. Does anyone have any real experiences of one brand failing vs another when they're stored properly - away from heat, out of sunlight, etc?
People have been burning CD's for well over 20 years now. Does anyone have any real experiences of one brand failing vs another when they're stored properly - away from heat, out of sunlight, etc?
Just to be clear, one CD will not "sound" any better than any other. Short of missing data (which would not color the sound but manifest as dropouts or errors) the only difference is errors and longevity. So to the original question of "sound quality" they all pretty much sound the same after you reach normal levels of error-free.
I've got a cd burner that was considered pretty respectable at the time, a Pioneer PDR W839 that I used to make mix cds back in the day. Now, 12 year old mix cds are starting to skip, and not play properly. These cds have minor wear only, and are in good shape for their age. I suspect that because I burned them at the highest speed possible, and bought bargain brand cdrs, they are now becoming harder to read. Had I used best quality cdrs to burn on, and burned them at normal play speed, I'm sure I wouldn't be facing this issue.