You would call or email their office.Trouble with the VTL, if it needs to be restored in some way, is that you'd never be able to get a step-by-step assembly manual with pictorial wiring diagrams for it.
You would call or email their office.Trouble with the VTL, if it needs to be restored in some way, is that you'd never be able to get a step-by-step assembly manual with pictorial wiring diagrams for it.
Once I experienced failure of an output coupling cap on one of my MB-450s. I emailed Bea and she helped me diagnose the trouble and sent me a replacement.And they would provide such documentation for it?
The nice thing about VTL products is few folks find any reason to modify them.It is possible the VTL could be modified beyond the capabilities of free telephone or e-mail support.
That and the fact they cost $100 when introduced in '59 or so! You can only achieve that using inexpensive parts like carbon resistors, ceramic caps, comparatively small power supplies, etc. There was lots of room for improvement!The Dynacos were heavily marketed to DIYers from the start, so there is no surprise that they have been a favorite to dive into and change things.
Click here for their contact information.And does VTL offer after sales support to second owners? Just asking, as I've never seen one of these.
Once I experienced failure of an output coupling cap on one of my MB-450s. I emailed Bea and she helped me diagnose the trouble and sent me a replacement.
That's the nice thing about working with non-defunct companies. Are you familiar with them? They continue to manufacture some of the best tube amplifiers available. Bea personally auditions every one before it leaves the factory.
From the video, VTL looks to be a good small company, making high quality products. I'm not in the market for one, but still wondering if schematics of their older products are available, and whether they support such units when sold on by the original purchasers.Click here for their contact information.
This is not to say which amp @Potato_Head would prefer the sound of, all things being equal. But, a few things should be said, again if necessary. For instance, decades old Dynacos can have their parts refreshed 1:1 with the same "quality" of parts that VTL and other amps use. This is one of the problems with buying any older amplifier, including an older VTL amp that could very well need parts refreshing to be at its best.
The concern I often express is that someone will take a fifty year old sample of a Stereo 70 that needs a nursing home, and compare it to something having the advantage of newer parts quality, and inevitably decides the Stereo 70 can never be better than a relic from a bygone age. The Stereo 70 never had a chance. A valid comparison begins on a level playing field, but a half-century old amp usually doesn't have this luxury.
An upgraded power transformer for the Stereo 70 is also available. A good quality 5AR4 works fine in the Stereo 70 unless you try to pass 20Hz at full power - not likely in ordinary use - see Dave Gillespie's test results, here: http://www.audioregenesis.com/documents/ST-70 Base Line Testing.pdf The old phenolic circuit board in the Dynacos can be challenging, but with the right touch they can still be usable. If not, new FR4 copies are readily available, and, yes, they can be stuffed with the latest 1% metal film resistors and polypropylene capacitors. Beefing up the power supply is possible with either the upgraded quad section can, or adding discrete electrolytics under-chassis, or using a cap board.
I am not trying to say the original Stereo 70 is a perfect amp, but it's perceived faults should be put into a realistic context and not exaggerated. They can be refreshed with the same parts quality that much more expensive amps now enjoy. The original Dynaco started in the mid-1950s and went out of business around 1980, and the longevity of their original tube designs is manifestly obvious today, and there is more readily available, free support for the Dynacos than you'd likely get with most other brands.
Really? You won't find any such in VTL or Audio Research models. Both use WIMA film caps for bypass duty and strictly low noise metal film resistors.Some audiophiles still prefer carbon comp today, and ceramic capacitors are still appropriate for certain positions in the circuit.
As joules are exponentially related to voltage, you don't need "tens of thousands" for a stiff supply. Mine uses 1650 uF @ 550V for 250 joules. I'll never forget hearing a pair of Siegfrieds (like you find in VTL's listening room) in an audio reviewer friend's phenomenal system. Those run 4950 uF for 750 joules. To each his own!In any case, you can add tens of thousands of microfarads to a solid state amp, but it usually isn't an option for tube amps even today. Some feel that large amounts of capacitance in a tube amp power supply is undesirable.
Companies like VTL and Audio Research simply choose the highest quality, best sounding parts they can find. Here's another set of factory tour videos you might enjoy.IHe has long decried the audiophile penchant for parts upgrades, because he believes that the "magic" comes from the circuit topology, not boutique parts.
I prefer those with lowest noise and greatest linearity.since you seem to favor boutique parts...
With all of the comments this post has generated, I will have to do a good follow up review of both the amps and my thoughts about them! I hope to have both of them on Thursday of this week.Unfortunately, without pics of the VTL amp under discussion and, even better, a schematic, there's not a lot more to discuss. Maybe the OP will give a listening report?
But, just the same, here's an image of the Audio Research VSI55 that appears to show some carbon comp resistors installed - look above the octal sockets http://www.audiocostruzioni.com/r_s/ampli/audio-research-vsi55/audio_research-oben0q5l.jpg
Hello Dandy, Agreed.Great comment, Arts. This shows that 'which is better?' questions always imply 'better for whom?'.