Hi! I've recently been in the market for my first DAC. Judging from the huge selection of products available and the amount of discussion all over the web, it seems this a question that others frequently face.
In any case, my priorities are
1) Process the signal from my CD player (needs coax) and my Airport Express (needs Toslink). Eventually, I imagine higher resolution sources but these 2 are my immediate concerns. I get the impression that almost any recent DAC would provide a dramatic audible improvement for these sources.
2) Price and medium-term viability. I'd like not to replace this unit within the next 3 years or so though I understand that the technology in a DAC is changing faster (probably) than any other aspect of my stereo. Though I’ve said that almost any DAC I buy will probably improve the sound coming from the 2 devices I’ve mentioned, I’d still like to get the most natural and neutral sound for my money.
3) Flexibility. I need at least 1 coax and 1 Toslink right now and a way to switch between them. Also, I’d like to have XLR outputs.
4) Reasonably compliments the equipment I already have: McIntosh C2300 preamp, McIntosh MC252 amp, McIntosh MR88 tuner, B&W 804 speakers, Adcom GCD-700 cdplayer. And, of course the aforementioned Airport Express. I will likely add a music server in the next year or so but I’m sensitive to just blowing money left and right – i.e. I have trouble swallowing $8,000 for a music server/DAC.
I’ve considered (but not listened to):
Benchmark DAC-1
Music Hall DAC 25.2 (now apparently 25.3) -- I understand the XLR outputs don’t use the tube stage.
Van Alstine Insight EC DAC – XLR outputs are extra.
So far, I like the notion of the Van Alstine DAC but don’t have clear positive reasons for getting it. I realize that these 3 (configured as I’d prefer) represent a range in price from about $600 to about $1500. Which leads to my questions.
Which should I buy? One of these? Which others should I consider? Comparing the Van Alstine to the Benchmark, for instance, do you think the Van Alstine would sound significantly better and/or represents a better value?
Thanks in advance for your thoughts and insights (please forgive any ignorance I’ve demonstrated just now),
Mike
In any case, my priorities are
1) Process the signal from my CD player (needs coax) and my Airport Express (needs Toslink). Eventually, I imagine higher resolution sources but these 2 are my immediate concerns. I get the impression that almost any recent DAC would provide a dramatic audible improvement for these sources.
2) Price and medium-term viability. I'd like not to replace this unit within the next 3 years or so though I understand that the technology in a DAC is changing faster (probably) than any other aspect of my stereo. Though I’ve said that almost any DAC I buy will probably improve the sound coming from the 2 devices I’ve mentioned, I’d still like to get the most natural and neutral sound for my money.
3) Flexibility. I need at least 1 coax and 1 Toslink right now and a way to switch between them. Also, I’d like to have XLR outputs.
4) Reasonably compliments the equipment I already have: McIntosh C2300 preamp, McIntosh MC252 amp, McIntosh MR88 tuner, B&W 804 speakers, Adcom GCD-700 cdplayer. And, of course the aforementioned Airport Express. I will likely add a music server in the next year or so but I’m sensitive to just blowing money left and right – i.e. I have trouble swallowing $8,000 for a music server/DAC.
I’ve considered (but not listened to):
Benchmark DAC-1
Music Hall DAC 25.2 (now apparently 25.3) -- I understand the XLR outputs don’t use the tube stage.
Van Alstine Insight EC DAC – XLR outputs are extra.
So far, I like the notion of the Van Alstine DAC but don’t have clear positive reasons for getting it. I realize that these 3 (configured as I’d prefer) represent a range in price from about $600 to about $1500. Which leads to my questions.
Which should I buy? One of these? Which others should I consider? Comparing the Van Alstine to the Benchmark, for instance, do you think the Van Alstine would sound significantly better and/or represents a better value?
Thanks in advance for your thoughts and insights (please forgive any ignorance I’ve demonstrated just now),
Mike