Tristen
Active Member
A (rough) analogy using cars would be to compare a bare-bones hatchback with a normally-aspirated 1.5 liter four cylinder engine and narrow wheels to a Camaro with the 6.2 liter V-8 option and 20" steamroller wheels: sure, both cars can cruise easily and stably at 60mph, but - and of course I'm talking about the Autobahn in this next example- when cruising at 100mph, which car will be more stable & drivable at THAT speed?
As a random point of interest: I very regularly drove a 1.6L I4 NA car with narrow wheels that would spank a Camaro with the 6.2L V8... On the other hand, though, my car had a super high compression and high-reving build. It was also mid-engined, and quite stable at 100mph (and very stable at high speed on windy back-roads too). Similarly, I also drove a 250cc shifter-cart that would hit a top speed of 120 and pull 3g's in the courners. Camaros can basically go fast in a straight line where something nimble will not only beat it in a straight line, but also on a track that has turns.
As far as bare bones hatchbacks with.... subaru wrx and mitsubishi lancer evo's both have 4 cylinder engines. (though they're turbo'd and the evo is 2L I4 and the wrx is a boxer (4F) ... i digress) :zoom: