• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

WM/FX walkman plays poorly — by design?

Late Boomer

Super Member
I have collected seven WM/FX players: three basic FX101 with single direction play and no Dolby, and four machines with auto-reverse and Dolby: (2) FX315, (1) FX425, (1) FX407. I understand that this is a family of cheap plasticky players that were manufactured in hundreds of thousands if not millions, these are not DD machines. Still, there should be some minimum of quality they deliver. But of seven items I have two basic models play more or less satisfactorily to my taste in terms of response and wow and flutter, but they have no Dolby, which I wanted. Yet, all the auto-reverse Dolby models are completely unusable because of the rubbery sound. I replaced the belts on two of them, one plays about as bad as before the replacement; another, which has its belt completely melted into goo, plays surprisingly stable in terms of wow and flutter, but in the reverse mode on channel is muffled and another seems to have some crosstalk, so I suppose the head got misaligned. The head is not supposed to be adjusted, so I am screwed with this one too.

This is devastating. I understand these are 25-year old machines, but were they all that bad? Can a slightly thicker belt cause extra wow and flutter as one seller on eBay claims? One of the FX315 with a new belt plays fine in terms of speed and pitch. I've read that the pinch rollers may get hardened and polished, and someone suggested using 800-grit sandpaper to bring back the grip. Should I try? Should I lube plastic wheels with silicon grease? Are there any electronic parts that may affect wow and flutter?

P.S. I get it that even in their heyday Dolby models were far and between, so I don't know how portable player owners listened to pre-recorded cassettes, they must have rung into their ears, sounding all wrong, just like they do on the basic players I have now. I switched to CDs in mid 1990s and had less than ten pre-recorded tapes.
 
Register to hide this ad
They were probably OK then, the brush type motors have limited usable service life, other issues with gummed lube and shrunken acetal mechanism bits fouling the action of the transport.
 
"so I don't know how portable player owners listened to pre-recorded cassettes":
Back in the day, one just got used to tape hiss on Walkmans. Some were better than others, but I never had one with Dolby. I only remember it being an issue when I was listening to classical music. Yes, then it did suck. I figured out pretty quick not to buy classical music on cassette. CD's were a godsend for classical listeners.
 
Back in the day, one just got used to tape hiss on Walkmans.
It is not just hiss, but overboosted treble, and "correcting" it, as cassette liner notes suggested, by "decreasing treble response" was not the same as listening to it with Dolby on. Not to mention that most portable players did not have tone controls either.

As I was listening primarily to home-recorded tapes with no Dolby, I did not care. But how did others cope? ;-) This is a clear imbalance between tape duplicators and player manufacturers.

Regarding wow and flutter on my portable players, I replaced belts in two of them, first by using slightly thicker belts from one supplier, than by using slightly thinner belts from another supplier. Wow and flutter is better with thinner belts, but the belts seem too thin compared to the original ones, and the sound is still not good enough. The 425 has really nice frequency response for a portable device, but its tape wobble ruins it. It works for most of rock stuff, and even rather quaint for synth, as if the synths were tube-driven, a bit unstable and pulsating. But when it gets to slow piano or guitar... meh.

CDs were a godsend for everyone. But solid state was even better. I got my first solid-state MP3 player in 2001, before HDD-based iPod came out. Smaller than a CD player, not susceptible to bumps, practically no noise, no wow and flutter, no chewed tape, and even at 128 kbps it was still good enough. Why one would want to revive cassettes is beyond me.
 
"Why one would want to revive cassettes is beyond me"

Well, as far as using them with a quality, 3 head deck and employing Dolby, I find that I can copy a CD onto Chrome tape and get very close to source quality recording. Add metal tape into the mix, and, with some good technique, you can pretty much duplicate the source. Plus, they are fun
 
FX407 > FX315 > FX425 > FX101


️️️️️https://youtu.be/u8f6q_xbs_0?si=8aiIQOPhPB0qLFAM️

⏰️️
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom