• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Yamaha YP-D8 or PF-800?

winegasman

Active Member
I just picked up a mint PF-800. I've been very satisfied with my YP-D8 for about 3 years now, but couldn't resist the price of the PF-800. Any thoughts on how they might sound different, and what to listen for when I can get the PF-800 set up?

I have no preference for DD or belt -- just want the one that sounds best and is easier to maintain.

All thoughts appreciated. Thanks,
Rich
 
Register to hide this ad
pf-800

I really like the pf-800,the base is very vibration resistant,Some folks point out that the inter-connects are garbage.....these CAN be replaced with a little surgery.I have mine in constant use with no problems the last 2+ years,,,mine was well cared for with a V-15 lV,I'm thinkin you will love it.I recently changed to a Denon 160 cartridge which is still in break-in status.Congrats!!!:yes:
 
I love my PF800. I have a Denon DL103 on mine and it sings. Everytime I look at a better table and think about pulling the trigger, I always end up saying nah my PF is plenty good enough, Not to mention a number of the current hyped decks it can blow into the weeds.

marc mc
 
I just picked up a mint PF-800. I've been very satisfied with my YP-D8 for about 3 years now, but couldn't resist the price of the PF-800. Any thoughts on how they might sound different, and what to listen for when I can get the PF-800 set up?

I have no preference for DD or belt -- just want the one that sounds best and is easier to maintain.

All thoughts appreciated. Thanks,
Rich

A TT is designed to rotate at a constant speed, and the tonearm hold the cart and track at the angle that it was designed for. If there is no mechanical problems...noisy motor or bearings, incorrect setup, etc...AND, using the SAME cartridge, I would think you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference between them, or a lot of other TT's of equal quality.

The only differences that I can discern in my 4 quartz locked DD TT's I would attribute to the different carts that they have, and different systems. The belt drive Micro-Seki need a speed disk to verify correct speed, so that's a different wrench in the setup.

One weekend, I tried all 5 on my SX-3800 system, and they sounded remarkably alike...at least to these old ears. :thmbsp:
 
The topline Yamaha turntables (YP-D8/10, PF-800/1000, PX-2/3 etc) were all great turntables. I’d expect the PF-800 to be a better turntable than the YP-D8, which was one of the best Japanese DD turntables of that era (I have a late 70’s review of the YP-D8 – PM me if you want it). The reason that I think it would be better is that it’s a newer design, and incorporates Yamaha’s version of spring suspension, so it should be more resistant to feedback.

The difference between a good turntable and a great turntable as far as sound goes is often down to feedback resistance - the more resistant to feedback, the less coloured the sound. While the YP-D8 was pretty good, it relied mainly on a very heavy base and insulated feet to absorb feedback. While a heavy base helps, the fact that the platter is attached to that base means that some vibration will make its way back to the stylus. The fact that the PF-800 isolates the tonearm and the platter from the main base and cover should make it quite a lot better – the Linn Sondeks, Thorens and other models with decent sprung baseboards always sounded pretty good due to the relative lack of feedback compared to other models (if they were set up properly – the Linns weren’t the easiest to setup:no:).

The PF-800 also had better specifications, so obviously it was a better design than the YP-D8 when new. Make sure you get a new belt for it, as belt drive turntables only perform near their best with relatively new belts – as soon as they start to stretch or slip, performance can suffer, particularly for wow and flutter (speed).

Because the sound of a turntable is influenced to a large degree by the cartridge, you should have the same cartridge to compare sound between the turntables. Different cartridges will impart their own sound, so some of the difference you'll hear between them (if you hear any:D) would be down to the cartridges. And of course, you should also use the same music, otherwise record differences will be a factor.:music: You should also use speakers (rather than headphones) to listen to them, so that you'll be able to hear the differences due to acoustic feedback, and listen to them at a good level. You don't have to blast your ears off, but just listen at a reasonable level. Of course, if you listen via headphones normally, then feedback won't be a problem with either of them.

When I speak about feedback, it's not howling that I'm talking about, although that's the worst kind - it will just be a subtle degradation of the sound at higher levels when listening through speakers, as the sound vibrates the turntable and affects the sound. Feedback is about the worst thing about turntables, really,:tears: and a major reason why there can be significant differences between the sound of different turntables, even when measurements of wow and flutter (speed discrepancies) or rumble (noise) may be quite similar between them. We get more questions about feedback here than just about any other subject.:D

-Don
 
New home...new owner...same table

I hope you don'd mind me dropping in here on this thread, but since I now have Rich's PF-800 it seemed relevant :-).

I have been looking for a nice clean PF800 for quite some time. I already have a PX-2 in the house and wanted "the other killer Yamaha" for my office system. This certainly was "The One" as "mint" and "immaculate" don't begin to describe this museum piece. I've been listening for two days solid now and I have to say I'm a big fan of the PF already. It's a beautifully made table that sounds as good as it looks. The AT MC cartridge setup on it is a little strange to look at (who would use a P-mount cartridge with an adaptor on a non-P table???) but it sounds great and that's really the bottom line. I'm going to save any comparisons to the PX for another time - a time when they have the same or very similar cartridges and are in the same room using the same system.

My only real gripe about the PF is that the spring-loaded suspension makes it hard to walk in the room when a record is playing. The more solidly suspended PX has no such issues and will still allow for enough isolation for some pretty high listening levels with no feedback. I guess 50lbs of non-resonant cast aluminum allow you to do that.

I'm still walking on air - somehow I now own both of the Yamaha "dream" tables from the 80s that I lusted after but couldn't remotely afford when they were new. I think it speaks volumes that both are still highly prized and command amazing prices all these years later.

Yamaha - are you listening??? Why are you not making a newer version of either of these ???? People are still paying top dollar for 20 year old tables!

Thanks again Rich - it was nice meeting you and the table is a dream come true!


jblnut
 
Back
Top Bottom