• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Advice on a new tube buffer

lattiboy

Well-Known Member
Hello everyone,

I previously had the FX audio tube buffer that is so popular here and elsewhere. It was a super fun device, but It’s been about five years and I’m assuming there have been new models released with better or different features.

I am looking for purely a tube buffer, I’m not looking for volume control or Bluetooth or anything else. Just some thing to occasionally put between my preamp and my power amp to play around with tubes.

Does anything like this exist? If not, what is the next best thing? Has anything unseated the FX audio?
 
Register to hide this ad
Nothing has really "unseated" the ~$35 dollar price point FX Audio unit, certainly not in a big way.

Please list any and all mods you made to your FX Audio Tube-01 unit, also include what PSU you use.

There's potentially big-ish room for improvement, especially if you can solder.



Rob43
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone,

I previously had the FX audio tube buffer that is so popular here and elsewhere. It was a super fun device, but It’s been about five years and I’m assuming there have been new models released with better or different features.

I am looking for purely a tube buffer, I’m not looking for volume control or Bluetooth or anything else. Just some thing to occasionally put between my preamp and my power amp to play around with tubes.

Does anything like this exist? If not, what is the next best thing? Has anything unseated the FX audio?
The FX is not a buffer, it's a preamp. The tube is configured as an anode (aka plate) follower, which provides gain. An anode follower takes the output off the plate.

A tube that's configured as a cathode follower, which has no gain, is a buffer. A cathode follower takes the output off the tube's cathode.

If you do a search for schematics you can see the difference.

I just remembered that I once posted a link to a buffer in the massive FX thread so I looked it up. It was the Yaqin SD-CD2. Way more expensive than the FX ($129.00 + 25 shipping). It looks like it has been discontinued and replaced with a new model which, as you would expect, is about $100 more. These are cathode followers and are described as such.

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_fr...0&LH_TitleDesc=0&_osacat=0&_odkw=YAQIN+SD-CD2
 
Last edited:
Ifi makes one, but I've never tried it. Looks interesting though.

https://ifi-audio.com/products/micro-itube2/
Interesting device, but it's not a buffer. On the bottom, one of the dip switch settings is "Buffer 9db". Anything that produces gain is, by definition, not a buffer.

Not cheap either at $400. It might sound good but, at that price, it should.

They do have great marketing copy.

Settings for the tube include SET, Push-Pull and Classic Tube. SET (Single Ended Triode) and Push-Pull are generally used to refer to the output stages of amplifiers, not preamps.

An SET uses a single triode tube as the power tube for each channel.

Push-Pull uses a pair of tubes as power outputs for each channel and the tubes can be triodes or pentodes (or others somewhat similar to pentodes).

Classic Tube is obviously just a marketing term. It supposedly mimics the sound of "tube based studio equipment", which is pretty vague.

The settings are apparently meant to describe the sound signatures of amps that use these configurations and are produced by changing the feedback levels around the tube.

Yes, tube, singular. Unlike the FX this uses only 1 tube, a 5670 which contains a pair of triodes in a single bottle. The FX uses a pair of pentode tubes that are "triode strapped", which means the plate is connected to the screen grid. So yeah, when each channel uses one section of the 5670, it is single-ended.

Push-pull would be impossible using one dual triode unless it was running in mono. You'd need two tubes for stereo. So the term is just used as a marketing phrase.

As with the FX, they're obviously running the tube at a much lower voltage than it's designed for. Otherwise it couldn't be mounted in a fully enclosed case.

I once posted a link to a buffer in the massive FX thread so I looked it up. It was the Yaqin SD-CD2. Way more expensive than the FX ($129.00 + 25 shipping). It looks like it has been discontinued and replaced with a new model which, as you would expect, is about $100 more. These are cathode followers and are described as such.

Turns out both the Yaqin models I mentioned have been around for a while. There are threads about them from 8 years ago. There are schematics online too.

Not sure why the Yaqins are so expensive since the circuit really isn't any more complicated than the one used in the FX. Simple circuits like this can be built quite cheaply.

When I was breadboarding preamps last year I experimented with the FX schematic and found that it sounded much better when the tubes were operated at higher voltages, which is what they were designed to do. I thought about trying them configured as a buffer (cathode follower) but never got around to trying it. In the end, I built a preamp using a different tube.
 
I owned a 5670 based Yaqin and sold it in favor of the FX Audio 01J.
Many 5670's are micro-phonic, which sent me diving for the volume control more than once.
The FX Audio 01J uses very little of the 6AK5's potential, it works for me.
The J for Japan features a switch which toggles between 0 gain and minus 6 db's of gain, which I use until the tube is broken-in.
 
Musical Fidelity sold a tube buffer "X10-V3". $400 new. I bought one probably 8yrs ago. Don't know if they still make them. I quit using mine since I now have a tube pre-amp.
 
I have a knockoff of the X-10. Sounds pretty good with Sylvania 6dj8 tubes.
In the right combo. Really liking it between computer & pre - going to add a dac in future.
 
The FX is not a buffer, it's a preamp. The tube is configured as an anode (aka plate) follower, which provides gain. An anode follower takes the output off the plate. A tube that's configured as a cathode follower, which has no gain, is a buffer. A cathode follower takes the output off the tube's cathode... I thought about trying them configured as a buffer (cathode follower) but never got around to trying it. In the end, I built a preamp using a different tube.

Hi ! sorry if i jump in with a question OT but i see the last post dates august.
I had in the past another tube buffer this one
https://www.china-hifi-audio.com/en...-p-145?zenid=7b52133195c97283a520c329e35345c6
i was not able to carry out a serious listening unfortunately ... the feeling was that the sound was ok. I am pretty sure that some mods could have been beneficial I cannot find it anymore
Now the OT question ... What about with a simple mod taking the signal out from the cathodes of the FX tubes and so using it as a buffer ? would it be a good idea ?
I am a little worried about the Zout from the Tube 01 as it is being too high ... i am driving 10-20kohm power amps. Actually my best one has Zin=5 kohm
A real buffer should have lower Zout i understand
i am so intrigued by the FX audio that i bought 3 units and many tubes to try out
i do not need Vgain but i happen to love what tubes can give to the sound in a solid state chain

When I was breadboarding preamps last year I experimented with the FX schematic and found that it sounded much better when the tubes were operated at higher voltages, which is what they were designed to do.
I see. i would love sincerely to try higher voltages but i am scared as hell of getting electrocuted
I would be happy enough with extracting as much as most possible out of a Tube 01 without having to play with deadly voltages
Tube rolling fine, parts replacement also fine ...
Thanks a lot for the very useful information, gino
 
Last edited:
Musical Fidelity sold a tube buffer "X10-V3". $400 new. I bought one probably 8yrs ago. Don't know if they still make them. I quit using mine since I now have a tube pre-amp.
I did the same and quite honestly, didn't see what all the fuss was about that unit (which sonically is mid-fi at best...and noisy, even after getting all new caps), or buffers in general. Certainly didn't improve the sound, but made it "different" and not always in a good way. Finally came to my senses and realized that to get a tube sound, a tube preamp and/or amp are the only way to get there properly.
 
What about with a simple mod taking the signal out from the cathodes of the FX tubes and so using it as a buffer ? would it be a good idea ?
I am a little worried about the Zout from the Tube 01 as it is being too high ... i am driving 10-20kohm power amps. Actually my best one has Zin=5 kohm A real buffer should have lower Zout i understand i am so intrigued by the FX audio that i bought 3 units and many tubes to try out i do not need Vgain but i happen to love what tubes can give to the sound in a solid state chain

i would love sincerely to try higher voltages but i am scared as hell of getting electrocuted
I would be happy enough with extracting as much as most possible out of a Tube 01 without having to play with deadly voltages Tube rolling fine, parts replacement also fine ...
Thanks a lot for the very useful information, gino
I've been over this with you on several previous occasions. Yet, you keep asking the exact same question so I'll try to explain it one more time.

Converting an anode follower circuit (like the FX) to a cathode follower circuit (a buffer) is not that difficult but it involves more than simply connecting the cathode to the output. There are a few other changes involved.

In previous posts I've linked an excellent DIY site that shows a schematic, parts list, tools list and provides extremely detailed, step-by-step instructions on how to build it. It even allows the use of the 12BH7, which you seem to want to try. It could be built in a metal chassis or even, like a breadboard, on a piece of wood using sockets and connectors that don't require soldering. I even provided links to the sockets and connectors.

Here it is again: https://wtfamps.com/muchedumbre-3/

Yes, it involves voltages that are higher than the FX has but that's a good thing. As I discovered when I breadboarded the FX circuit, the low voltages used are a serious limitation. The sound is much better when the tube is operated at "normal" voltages, for which it was designed. What a surprise!

While you're building something, there is no voltage present. After it's built, it will need to be tested but, if you're capable of keeping your fingers on the insulated plastic grips of a multimeter, there is no danger. You take the same risk when you plug a lamp into a wall socket. Presumably, you don't get shocked, which indicates that you're capable of holding the insulated portion of the plug without touching the metal prongs.

After I posted that link you said you would prefer to build a kit rather than build something from scratch. So, I posted a link to a buffer kit designed and sold by a highly respected audio "guru" that runs off the same type of wall wart power supply as the FX. I'm sure it also comes with very detailed instructions. The same designer also offers several other buffer kits.

Here it is again: https://glass-ware.stores.yahoo.net/tubu.html

Yet, you seem to be intent on taking a circuit board that is designed as a preamp and hacking it apart to create a buffer. I've tried to point out downsides and limitations of trying to modify a circuit board. They are not made to be modified. Yet, you persist . . .

There is a recent thread over on DIY Audio in which the poster converts something similar to the FX to a buffer. He uses one of the generic schematics to show the changes. The board pictured doesn't seem to be the same as the FX. I don't know know exactly where it came from. It looks like it may have been sold as a board only, and was never installed in a finished preamp like the FX. Here's a link:

https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/361957-6j1-buffer-conversion.html?

The problem with this approach is that, even if you successfully alter the circuit, you're still running the tubes at ridiculously low voltages so it will still be compromised.

The two examples I suggested earlier will, undoubtedly, yield better results and they are not difficult to build.
 
Last edited:
I've been over this with you on several previous occasions. Yet, you keep asking the exact same question so I'll try to explain it one more time.
Converting an anode follower circuit (like the FX) to a cathode follower circuit (a buffer) is not that difficult but it involves more than simply connecting the cathode to the output. There are a few other changes involved.

Hi ! sorry if you already told me i did not understand so clearly. Problem solved. Yes i was wrong. I was thinking exactly to that because that works normally for bjt/fet.

In previous posts I've linked an excellent DIY site that shows a schematic, parts list, tools list and provides extremely detailed, step-by-step instructions on how to build it. It even allows the use of the 12BH7, which you seem to want to try. It could be built in a metal chassis or even, like a breadboard, on a piece of wood using sockets and connectors that don't require soldering. I even provided links to the sockets and connectors.
Here it is again: https://wtfamps.com/muchedumbre-3/
Yes, it involves voltages that are higher than the FX has but that's a good thing. As I discovered when I breadboarded the FX circuit, the low voltages used are a serious limitation. The sound is much better when the tube is operated at "normal" voltages, for which it was designed. What a surprise!
While you're building something, there is no voltage present. After it's built, it will need to be tested but, if you're capable of keeping your fingers on the insulated plastic grips of a multimeter, there is no danger. You take the same risk when you plug a lamp into a wall socket. Presumably, you don't get shocked, which indicates that you're capable of holding the insulated portion of the plug without touching the metal prongs.
After I posted that link you said you would prefer to build a kit rather than build something from scratch. So, I posted a link to a buffer kit designed and sold by a highly respected audio "guru" that runs off the same type of wall wart power supply as the FX. I'm sure it also comes with very detailed instructions. The same designer also offers several other buffer kits.
Here it is again: https://glass-ware.stores.yahoo.net/tubu.html

Thanks a lot again. The second option is very ok. I see that the item is currently out of stock. Maybe because it has sold very well ? i will try to get info about it maybe there is something similar in the web

Yet, you seem to be intent on taking a circuit board that is designed as a preamp and hacking it apart to create a buffer.
Yes that was the idea. Or instead try to lower the FX gain and used an external buffer solid state I am sure just one tube in series with the signal would be enough for me
I think there were some hybrid preamp ... from Melos maybe ? just one tube will make the trick on sound. No reason to have an army of tubes ... at least for me.

I've tried to point out downsides and limitations of trying to modify a circuit board. They are not made to be modified. Yet, you persist . . .
There is a recent thread over on DIY Audio in which the poster converts something similar to the FX to a buffer.

then i am not alone in thinking weird :) i will read it with attention

He uses one of the generic schematics to show the changes. The board pictured doesn't seem to be the same as the FX. I don't know know exactly where it came from. It looks like it may have been sold as a board only, and was never installed in a finished preamp like the FX.
Here's a link:
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/361957-6j1-buffer-conversion.html?
The problem with this approach is that, even if you successfully alter the circuit, you're still running the tubes at ridiculously low voltages so it will still be compromised.
The two examples I suggested earlier will, undoubtedly, yield better results and they are not difficult to build.
i see your points. You say that the FX is limited by design. And then all these people replacing their expensive line stages with it ? does this mean that those are even more compromised ? this is shocking really It confuses me even more What these audio designers do ?
Leaving aside the conversion to buffer ... would it be possible to reduce the gain of the FX instead ?
i have already invested on tubes for the FX and as i said at the beginning i like what i hear quite a lot
I have only the feeling that the preamp does not push bass enough .... it has not the drive of a solid state preamp especially in the bass
But the sound is very interesting ... very
I will study the dyaudio link you have attached with attention
And will try to get info about how to buy this one very interesting
https://glass-ware.stores.yahoo.net/acf12stbu.html
Thanks a lot again.
Kind regards, gino :)
 
... There is a recent thread over on DIY Audio in which the poster converts something similar to the FX to a buffer. He uses one of the generic schematics to show the changes. The board pictured doesn't seem to be the same as the FX. I don't know know exactly where it came from. It looks like it may have been sold as a board only, and was never installed in a finished preamp like the FX. Here's a link:
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/361957-6j1-buffer-conversion.html?
The problem with this approach is that, even if you successfully alter the circuit, you're still running the tubes at ridiculously low voltages so it will still be compromised...
Hi ! thanks for the link I have found and bought the board and will try to mod it as indicated
In the end what i really need it is just a simple buffer. The tube is relaxing the sound expecially from digital sources in a way that i am finding fascinating and captivating.
Thanks a lot again to point at the thread.
Of course if the other 12VAC kit will be available again i will buy also that immediately. it looks clearly a better project. But it looks like it is out of stock ?
Kind regards, gino
 
Last edited:
Hi ! yes i have noticed that. In some cases the high price can be motivated by the parts quality ... but not always.
Brand name, commercial, gear tends to have very, very high profit margins. Once you get into DIY you realize that a lot of things that sell for many thousands of dollars only have a couple of hundred dollars in parts, sometimes not even that much.

there is still another option that i will try to explore. Transformer coupled outputs. I understand that good transformer are very very expensive.
Of course all my tube amps use output transformers but I can't tell you anything about transformer outputs on a preamp. They are very expensive and I build simple, low cost, designs.

i see many schematics around ... I have no clue about which to choose. I know almost nothing aside what you have told me. I need to study more. You say that you have " just picked up a bit of knowledge online over the years". Time is needed. . . . picking the right parts values does not sound to me as an easy task at all. How will i know that a stage is really improved/optimized after changing parts ? measurements ? listening test ?
Don't get hung up looking for perfection.

Just start by building a simple, proven, design. That's the first step. The basic buffer and anode follower schematics are proven designs. The DIY website with the buffer schematic I've pointed you to is a good place to start. All the design decisions have been calculated for you. Just follow the step-by-step instructions.

Eventually, after you've built a few things by following schematics, you can get into the design calculations.

Parts values are dictated by the tube you decide to use. For example, I mentioned the "rule of thumb" that says to use a plate resistor that's 3x to 5x the tube's plate resistance. The tube's data sheet also will dictate some of your decisions. The specs for "typical operation" are a good place to start. Maximum voltages, currents and plate dissipation are all in the data sheet. Eventually, you can start drawing load lines, using the graphs in the data sheet, to pick an operating point.

Building and designing are two different things. Start by building someone else's designs from a schematic.

I've only done a little basic design. I'm mostly a copy and paste builder. I often just take elements from different designs and combine them in new ways. My 1626 preamp is based on a schematic I found online. The only major change was that I used a battery to bias the tube instead of a cathode resistor. If you read the thread I posted about it you'll see that it's nothing particularly special but it still sounds great.

I don't have any sophisticated equipment. No scope, no distortion analyzer or anything like that. I have a multimeter, a couple of tube testers, a couple of capacitor testers - just very basic equipment. But all you really need is a multimeter. I mostly use the other stuff when I'm restoring vintage amps, which I how I got started. I make decisions based on what I hear. That's all I can do.

Again, if you're following a schematic the design work, and often detailed measurements, have already been done for you. All you have to do is build it.

Once you get some hands on experience and gain some building skills you can move on towards design if you choose. But learn to build first.
 
Brand name, commercial, gear tends to have very, very high profit margins. Once you get into DIY you realize that a lot of things that sell for many thousands of dollars only have a couple of hundred dollars in parts, sometimes not even that much.
Hi again. There is lot of marketing behind. I see. And i am sure that many audiophiles go for the look of the units. Not me ... i do not like even the power leds ... but they are useful to understand that the unit is on of course. But for instance i love to listen in the darkness ... so in the end look for me is not essential.
I do not want to be distracted by what i see

Of course all my tube amps use output transformers but I can't tell you anything about transformer outputs on a preamp. They are very expensive and I build simple, low cost, designs.
i see. I said this because an OT could solve easily the impedance matching issues. Then any low to medium mu tube will be just fine. Any.
Moreover they will isolate electrically the power amp from the upstream part of the chain.
I had the feeling that good ones are really expensive. I have to look at the price to get an idea of their costs.
A pair of OTs could be seen as a lifetime investment. They would last forever and be usable in different projects.
They will free to use almost any triode around. I will get info.
I will also ask about the cathode follower and why it has a slightly bad reputation sonic wise. I like the anode follower scheme a lot. It seems like the most basic schematic.

Don't get hung up looking for perfection. Just start by building a simple, proven, design. That's the first step.
Those breadboards you mentioned are very handy indeed and the prototype could become also the final unit.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Breadboard...eat-for-Experiments-Prototyping-/152240765977
I have just a preference about the power supply detached from the preamp circuits enclosure.
And i like nice wooden cases ... or piano black finish also very very classy

The basic buffer and anode follower schematics are proven designs. The DIY website with the buffer schematic I've pointed you to is a good place to start. All the design decisions have been calculated for you. Just follow the step-by-step instructions. Eventually, after you've built a few things by following schematics, you can get into the design calculations.
Parts values are dictated by the tube you decide to use. For example, I mentioned the "rule of thumb" that says to use a plate resistor that's 3x to 5x the tube's plate resistance. The tube's data sheet also will dictate some of your decisions. The specs for "typical operation" are a good place to start. Maximum voltages, currents and plate dissipation are all in the data sheet. Eventually, you can start drawing load lines, using the graphs in the data sheet, to pick an operating point.
Building and designing are two different things. Start by building someone else's designs from a schematic.

I see your point but i have really to study first to feel more comfortable with the all issue. I need a basic text on tubes with calculation examples. For sure given that i am only interested in preamp very basic circuits is what i am interested in. Like a tubes for dummies book.

I've only done a little basic design. I'm mostly a copy and paste builder.
I have read an article by Mr Nelson Pass about how he started. He was a repair man i do not remember if full time or in the free time. He was telling that he learned a lot looking at the schematics on the service manuals. Those are clearly working designs ... maybe not fully optimized but working. Truth is that like you said more time manufacturers tend to use tubes readily available even if other obsolete tubes could be much better fit for a same purpose (what a pity). And often they were tubes not used in audio equipment. Still the same equations apply to triodes of different electrical characteristics i guess.
What scares me most are the plate voltages involved. Very very high and so dangerous. I have to be very careful. Right now i have not even the space to work properly and for this i think to start reading books/paper. This hobby has captured my interest for almost 40 years. There are good chances that it will keep me interested for the rest of the life. Voltages are an issue by the way.

I often just take elements from different designs and combine them in new ways.
My 1626 preamp is based on a schematic I found online. The only major change was that I used a battery to bias the tube instead of a cathode resistor. If you read the thread I posted about it you'll see that it's nothing particularly special but it still sounds great.
May i ask why the battery ? are there benefits from using it instead of a resistor ? can it be used in any schematic ? i am asking for another preamp i have somewhere this one here
https://www.passdiy.com/projects/images/content/brideofzen_1.png
i mean .... can R108=100 ohm be replaced with a 4V battery ? with which benefits ?

I don't have any sophisticated equipment. No scope, no distortion analyzer or anything like that. I have a multimeter, a couple of tube testers, a couple of capacitor testers - just very basic equipment. But all you really need is a multimeter.
I see. Anyway i understand that just a good SW and a pc with a decent usb card are enough at least for very basic measurements. I have only measured the noise and 1kHz distortion of two my sound cards ... i like instruments a lot. I love them. I love the lab part of the reviews a lot. But i am also know when i like a sound or not. And i am quite sold on the hyrid concept.
Tube front end and solid state power. I think i have identified the problem with most solid state amps ... the power supply capacitance implemented. Too little in most cases.

I mostly use the other stuff when I'm restoring vintage amps, which I how I got started. I make decisions based on what I hear. That's all I can do. Again, if you're following a schematic the design work, and often detailed measurements, have already been done for you. All you have to do is build it. Once you get some hands on experience and gain some building skills you can move on towards design if you choose. But learn to build first.

Maybe i am underestimate the building side of the task but i really need to know some basics on tube circuits first and i am sure i will do asap.
For instance just to understand what to look at in a tube datasheet like you told me ... to understand if a certain tube is the right one for the task.
I know now that for line preamp duties low amplification factor and low plate resistance are good things to have.
I am attaching as a try a datasheet of a tube that could be also suitable, imho, for a line stage. Am i right ?
At least the version 2 ... mu=5.4; plate resistance=750 ohm
it is a double triode so just one tube for both channel in an anode follower configuration should provide the needed low gain and probably also a decently low Zout.
I have found about it surfing some threads at diyaudio.com another great source of info.

An interesting thread about low mu tubes ... i am reading it now
https://audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/low-mu-preamps-why-arent-there-more.616764/
Thanks a lot again and have a nice day,
gino
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Those breadboards you mentioned are very handy indeed and the prototype could become also the final unit.
Yes, those surface mount sockets are very handy. Most breadboard setups are spread out over a fairly large area but that just allows more room for experimentation. Clip leads are typically used to connect things. But the same sockets and screw connectors can be positioned closer together and connected with short wires. The whole thing can be built in a simple box.

I see your point but i have really to study first to feel more comfortable with the all issue. I need a basic text on tubes with calculation examples. For sure given that i am only interested in preamp very basic circuits is what i am interested in. Like a tubes for dummies book.
There's lots of stuff online and I'm sure you can find some books too. You should be aware, however, that much of what you'll find is about guitar amps. Some of the most basic info applies to both guitar and Hi-Fi but guitar amps and preamps are designed to produce distortion so a lot of what you'll find is of limited use with Hi-Fi.

manufacturers tend to use tubes readily available even if other obsolete tubes could be much better fit for a same purpose (what a pity). And often they were tubes not used in audio equipment. Still the same equations apply to triodes of different electrical characteristics i guess.

What scares me most are the plate voltages involved. Very very high and so dangerous.
Yes, there are thousands of tube types out there and very few were designed for audio but they can be often still be used in audio applications. I like to use tubes that are somewhat obscure as long as they are relatively available and cheap.

It's good to respect the dangerous voltages but, as I've said, nobody works on a circuit when it's powered up. When you're building something it's just parts and wire so there is absolutely no danger involved.

After I put something together, I then double and triple check the connections against the schematic. When it's powered up the only thing that touches the circuit are the probes of the meter. It's no more dangerous than plugging a lamp into the wall socket. After it's been powered down, caps can remain charged so they must be discharged through a resistor. I then clip wires between the caps and ground to make sure there is no voltage before I continue working on the circuit.

May i ask why the battery ? are there benefits from using it instead of a resistor ? can it be used in any schematic ? i am asking for another preamp i have somewhere this one here
https://www.passdiy.com/projects/images/content/brideofzen_1.png
i mean .... can R108=100 ohm be replaced with a 4V battery ? with which benefits ?
If you look at the schematic of an anode follower preamp you'll see that the tube's cathode is typically connected to ground with a resistor, the cathode resistor. The ground side has 0 volts and the cathode side has some amount of positive voltage.

Bias voltage is measured from the tube's grid to the cathode. The grid is 0v so compared to the, let's say for example, +9v at the cathode the grid is at -9v. So you can accomplish the same bias point by grounding the cathode directly (no resistor) and connecting a negative voltage from a battery to the grid.

The grid, in most cases, draws no current, so the battery does not run down. Batteries have a "shelf life". For a lithium it's roughly 10 years so it won't need to be replaced for a while. Other types may only last a few years.

The only advantage is that, in many cases, the cathode resistor is bypassed with an electrolytic cap. These caps are used because a large capacitance is needed (you'll have to research this on your own) but sonically they aren't that great.

If no cathode bypass cap is used, there is no advantage to using the battery. But if there is a bypass cap, the battery allows you to eliminate it. But batteries only come in certain voltages, so they aren't always practical. If you need a different bias voltage, a battery won't work.

Depending on the circuit, however, you may need to add a cap to block the DC voltage from the battery from getting to whatever you have plugged into the input. But the blocking cap can be a small value, which means you can use a film cap, which is technically much better.

The circuit you've posted is not a tube circuit so I have no idea how it could be modified.

Maybe i am underestimate the building side of the task but i really need to know some basics on tube circuits first
For instance just to understand what to look at in a tube datasheet like you told me ... to understand if a certain tube is the right one for the task.
Again, you're not talking about the "building side of the task" here, you're talking about the "design process". Learn to build someone else's designs first. You will, over time, learn more about how to design things on your own. You don't need to know how to design an car engine in order to change the oil or do minor repairs on your car.

I am attaching as a try a datasheet of a tube that could be also suitable, imho, for a line stage. Am i right ?
At least the version 2 ... mu=5.4; plate resistance=750 ohm
it is a double triode so just one tube for both channel in an anode follower configuration should provide the needed low gain and probably also a decently low Zout.
There are several dissimilar triodes like the 6GF7. I briefly tried one, the 6EM7, on my breadboard. They are typically used to build an amp with the high mu section as input and the low mu as output. One tube per channel. A lot of people have built these and there are several schematics out there. Not much power but they reportedly sound quite nice.

Since the two sections are not the same, you would need one tube per channel for a preamp, just as you need one per channel for an amp. But, yes, you can just ignore the high mu section and use the low mu one.

The only downside to the 6GF7 is that the base is not very common (a large 9 pin like the 7868 output tube). The 6EM7 uses a common octal socket, as does the 6EA7. There are others that use 9 pin miniature bases. (6CY7, 6DE7, 6DR7, 6EW7, 6FD7). I was going to try one of them but I got tired of breadboarding and, since I really liked the 1626, I just built with it.

I haven't read through that thread but it looks interesting. I see that you revived it (it's been dormant for 5 years) so maybe some additional comments will be made.

The tube board here, where the thread above is located, is actually the best place for you to post about your interest in tube preamps / buffers. This board is really supposed to be about discussing new, commercially sold, products, not DIY. And the "DIY" board here is most all about solid state. And much of it is not even truly DIY. The DIY Audio forum is very much about DIY but, as you may have noticed, a lot of the participants have such a high level of technical expertise that it's hard to understand at times. Some of them are helpful, others are only interested in arguing with each other about highly technical issues.
 
Yes, those surface mount sockets are very handy. Most breadboard setups are spread out over a fairly large area but that just allows more room for experimentation. Clip leads are typically used to connect things. But the same sockets and screw connectors can be positioned closer together and connected with short wires. The whole thing can be built in a simple box There's lots of stuff online and I'm sure you can find some books too. You should be aware, however, that much of what you'll find is about guitar amps.
Some of the most basic info applies to both guitar and Hi-Fi but guitar amps and preamps are designed to produce distortion so a lot of what you'll find is of limited use with Hi-Fi
Yes, there are thousands of tube types out there and very few were designed for audio but they can be often still be used in audio applications

Good morning ! I see. As you said i think that in the end starting from a proven schematic is the by far the most reasonable option. Just to say i see many clones in the web of famous preamps. Unfortunately they all use medium to high mu tubes.
Looking for tubes similar to the 1626 tube (i.e. with low mu and low plate resistance) i see that the family is that of power triode, single or double.
I have look also around for a table possibly sortable with all tubes main electrica data but i did not find any. That table could allow to sort different model tubes by mu and plate R.
RCA 6080 twin power triode for instance is a mu=2 and R plate= 280 ohm tube ... others being the 6AS7, 6528, the low-mu version of the 6GF7A
I see that you decided for a single triode per channel and i am pretty sure that keeping the two channels separated must have advantages.
Instead using just one twin triode could simplify the design ?
I have also read that low mu tubes are inherently less noisy. Another good point. But what about their linearity ? still ok ?

I like to use tubes that are somewhat obscure as long as they are relatively available and cheap.
the fact that they are also a better option for a specific design like a line stage for me is decisive
The line preamp specifications are low gain and low Zout and low distortion in the end.

It's good to respect the dangerous voltages but, as I've said, nobody works on a circuit when it's powered up. When you're building something it's just parts and wire so there is absolutely no danger involved.
After I put something together, I then double and triple check the connections against the schematic. When it's powered up the only thing that touches the circuit are the probes of the meter. It's no more dangerous than plugging a lamp into the wall socket. After it's been powered down, caps can remain charged so they must be discharged through a resistor. I then clip wires between the caps and ground to make sure there is no voltage before I continue working on the circuit
i will observe all the instructions and thank you very much for this. Safety first.

If you look at the schematic of an anode follower preamp you'll see that the tube's cathode is typically connected to ground with a resistor, the cathode resistor.
The ground side has 0 volts and the cathode side has some amount of positive voltage.
Bias voltage is measured from the tube's grid to the cathode. The grid is 0v so compared to the, let's say for example, +9v at the cathode the grid is at -9v. So you can accomplish the same bias point by grounding the cathode directly (no resistor) and connecting a negative voltage from a battery to the grid. The grid, in most cases, draws no current, so the battery does not run down. Batteries have a "shelf life". For a lithium it's roughly 10 years so it won't need to be replaced for a while. Other types may only last a few years
i see and i can say that i much prefer the battery solution by far because the cathode is separated from the ground. Batteries have a magic touch in reducing noise when they are used. I do not know when i will have a tube preamp but i am pretty sure it will have that battery. I see also diodes used ... zeners ? that would be also interesting if possible. But i like very much the isolation from the ground
Ground can be noisy

The only advantage is that, in many cases, the cathode resistor is bypassed with an electrolytic cap. These caps are used because a large capacitance is needed (you'll have to research this on your own) but sonically they aren't that great. If no cathode bypass cap is used, there is no advantage to using the battery. But if there is a bypass cap, the battery allows you to eliminate it. But batteries only come in certain voltages, so they aren't always practical. If you need a different bias voltage, a battery won't work
are diodes like zeners usable instead ? there are zeners of pretty much any voltage ... but i love the battery solution

Depending on the circuit, however, you may need to add a cap to block the DC voltage from the battery from getting to whatever you have plugged into the input. But the blocking cap can be a small value, which means you can use a film cap, which is technically much better
So not an issue at all. Very good. A small film cap costs nothing.

Again, you're not talking about the "building side of the task" here, you're talking about the "design process". Learn to build someone else's designs first. You will, over time, learn more about how to design things on your own. You don't need to know how to design an car engine in order to change the oil or do minor repairs on your car.
i do not know which is you main occupation, but everyone start learning a job at school ... engineers, doctors, lawyers ...
I was watching a tv program on Albert Einstein ... he has been able to predict physical phenomena only on calculation basis.
They were some collegues very critic of his approach. In the end they were able to perform the tests and the evidence was that he was right.
Maybe it is just me but i feel like i need to see some formula.
Anyway now time is too little. I am single and when i do not work i have to take care of the home duties. And now we are again locked down.
I just hope that the all thing is for real. For the sake of everyone. Here in Italy the situation is becoming very very bad. And strange.

There are several dissimilar triodes like the 6GF7. I briefly tried one, the 6EM7, on my breadboard. They are typically used to build an amp with the high mu section as input and the low mu as output. One tube per channel. A lot of people have built these and there are several schematics out there. Not much power but they reportedly sound quite nice.
Since the two sections are not the same, you would need one tube per channel for a preamp, just as you need one per channel for an amp. But, yes, you can just ignore the high mu section and use the low mu one.
yes ... i read in the DS .... "the 6EM7 contains two dissimilar triodes in one envelope". Now that i look better ... also the 6GF7 is a similar triode with the two sections different ? Istinctively i see this built as a complication.
Better a single triode or a double one with similar sections .... i cannot afford complications

The only downside to the 6GF7 is that the base is not very common (a large 9 pin like the 7868 output tube). The 6EM7 uses a common octal socket, as does the 6EA7. There are others that use 9 pin miniature bases. (6CY7, 6DE7, 6DR7, 6EW7, 6FD7). I was going to try one of them but I got tired of breadboarding and, since I really liked the 1626, I just built with it.
if i were you i would stick with what i like ... i do not know if some little mods can improve your preamp further ... i would try a high end attenuator.
It can be costly but it is a good investment for sound. Just changing the volume attenuator can provide great improvements.

I haven't read through that thread but it looks interesting. I see that you revived it (it's been dormant for 5 years) so maybe some additional comments will be made.
The tube board here, where the thread above is located, is actually the best place for you to post about your interest in tube preamps / buffers.
This board is really supposed to be about discussing new, commercially sold, products, not DIY. And the "DIY" board here is most all about solid state. And much of it is not even truly DIY.
The DIY Audio forum is very much about DIY but, as you may have noticed, a lot of the participants have such a high level of technical expertise that it's hard to understand at times. Some of them are helpful, others are only interested in arguing with each other about highly technical issues.

Thank you very much for this and all other very precious advice. I do not want to sound flattering but i sincerely admire your skills. And you told me that it took you years to reach this level of knowledge and expertise.
I am just a beginner ... i have to learn to walk before to run. And moreover for contingent reasons my free time is limited now.
But i see the retirement approaching as an opportunity to cultivate my passions (i hope not to end electrocuted in the process )
So in the end the tubes to study are the like of 1626, 6520, 6528, 6080, 6082, 6AS7 ... single or double triodes (with identical sections) with both low mu and low Rplate
Thanks again and have a nice day
gino
 
Last edited:
Good morning ! I see. As you said i think that in the end starting from a proven schematic is the by far the most reasonable option. Just to say i see many clones in the web of famous preamps. Unfortunately they all use medium to high mu tubes.
Looking for tubes similar to the 1626 tube (i.e. with low mu and low plate resistance) i see that the family is that of power triode, single or double.
I have look also around for a table possibly sortable with all tubes main electrica data but i did not find any. That table could allow to sort different model tubes by mu and plate R.
RCA 6080 twin power triode for instance is a mu=2 and R plate= 280 ohm tube ... others being the 6AS7, 6528, the low-mu version of the 6GF7A
I see that you decided for a single triode per channel and i am pretty sure that keeping the two channels separated must have advantages.
Instead using just one twin triode could simplify the design ?
I have also read that low mu tubes are inherently less noisy. Another good point. But what about their linearity ? still ok ?


the fact that they are also a better option for a specific design like a line stage for me is decisive
The line preamp specifications are low gain and low Zout and low distortion in the end.


i will observe all the instructions and thank you very much for this. Safety first.


i see and i can say that i much prefer the battery solution by far because the cathode is separated from the ground. Batteries have a magic touch in reducing noise when they are used. I do not know when i will have a tube preamp but i am pretty sure it will have that battery. I see also diodes used ... zeners ? that would be also interesting if possible. But i like very much the isolation from the ground
Ground can be noisy


are diodes like zeners usable instead ? there are zeners of pretty much any voltage ... but i love the battery solution


So not an issue at all. Very good. A small film cap costs nothing.


i do not know which is you main occupation, but everyone start learning a job at school ... engineers, doctors, lawyers ...
I was watching a tv program on Albert Einstein ... he has been able to predict physical phenomena only on calculation basis.
They were some collegues very critic of his approach. In the end they were able to perform the tests and the evidence was that he was right.
Maybe it is just me but i feel like i need to see some formula.
Anyway now time is too little. I am single and when i do not work i have to take care of the home duties. And now we are again locked down.
I just hope that the all thing is for real. For the sake of everyone. Here in Italy the situation is becoming very very bad. And strange.


yes ... i read in the DS .... "the 6EM7 contains two dissimilar triodes in one envelope". Now that i look better ... also the 6GF7 is a similar triode with the two sections different ? Istinctively i see this built as a complication.
Better a single triode or a double one with similar sections .... i cannot afford complications


if i were you i would stick with what i like ... i do not know if some little mods can improve your preamp further ... i would try a high end attenuator.
It can be costly but it is a good investment for sound. Just changing the volume attenuator can provide great improvements.



Thank you very much for this and all other very precious advice. I do not want to sound flattering but i sincerely admire your skills. And you told me that it took you years to reach this level of knowledge and expertise.
I am just a beginner ... i have to learn to walk before to run. And moreover for contingent reasons my free time is limited now.
But i see the retirement approaching as an opportunity to cultivate my passions (i hope not to end electrocuted in the process )
So in the end the tubes to study are the like of 1626, 6520, 6528, 6080, 6082, 6AS7 ... single or double triodes (with identical sections) with both low mu and low Rplate
Thanks again and have a nice day
gino
Again, this board is supposed to be for discussion of new, commercially available, gear that is considered to be a "good value".

I'll try to send you a private message sometime but I'm pretty busy trying to build an amp right now.
 
Back
Top Bottom