• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

AI knows about AK...

Wigwam Jones

Wigwam Jones

Caesar non supra grammati
I asked Gemini AI a question about BSR vs Garrard record changers, and it cited AK in its reply:

Garrard record changers are generally considered to be superior to BSR record changers. Here's why:

* **Build Quality:** Garrards were typically built with higher quality components and more robust mechanisms, leading to better reliability and longevity.
* **Performance:** Garrards often exhibited better performance characteristics, such as lower rumble and wow & flutter, resulting in more accurate sound reproduction.
* **Features:** Some Garrard models offered more advanced features than comparable BSR models, such as improved speed stability and more sophisticated auto-change mechanisms.

However, it's important to note that:

* **There were exceptions:** Some BSR models, particularly higher-end ones, could offer decent performance.
* **Condition matters:** The condition of any particular unit, regardless of brand, will significantly impact its performance. A well-maintained BSR might outperform a neglected Garrard.

Ultimately, the "better" brand depends on the specific models being compared and their condition. If you're looking for a reliable and high-performing record changer, a Garrard is generally a safer bet, but don't discount BSR entirely, especially if you find a well-preserved and well-maintained unit.

Here are some resources that might be helpful:

* **Vinyl Engine:** This website has a wealth of information on vintage turntables, including BSR and Garrard models. You can find technical specifications, user manuals, and forum discussions.
* **Audiokarma:** This online forum is a great place to ask questions about vintage audio equipment, including record changers. You can get expert opinions and advice from other audio enthusiasts.

I hope this helps!
 
Register to hide this ad
AI is a very fast reader with a good memory and ability to mix together all the crap it has read about the topic you query. With all the wrong info on the web I wonder if it will lead to the dumbing down of the population.

At least the description of ak is good, “expert opinions and advice…” the latter covers the biases we have when it isn’t an expert opinion.
 
Last edited:
Wigwam Jones said:
Ask it to rate AK. Much entertainment.
Click to expand...
I don’t want entertainment from AI. I want it to parse mountains of data to find genetic anomalies cure disease, run finite element analysis, and accurately do tedious tasks that are difficult for humans to do consistently. I don’t want AI to plagiarize art, illustrations, videos, or literature , compose poetry or provide summaries of information that I can glean for myself. Generative AI will only make us fat, lazy and stupid, while it robs us of our creativity for the enrichment of its masters. Eff that.
 
Everything about AI depends on who's hands it is in. Look at the evolution of the cell phone for a model. It went from a useful mobile communicator to a tracking and spying and information collection device in 2o years. From good to evil in a couple decades.
 
GChief said:
The luddite centeric threads are always entertaining :thumbsup:
Click to expand...
For the record, I’m not opposed to technology, I’m against IP theft; generative AI is nothing but plagiarism software and would not function without human generated creativity to steal. I find this statement to be on point: “the purpose of AI is to allow wealth access to skill, while removing from the skilled the ability to access wealth.” I’ve relied on my creativity throughout my life as a musician, visual artist, writer and designer; I find the purpose of generative AI to be deeply troubling and offensive, as should anyone who has invested time and effort into developing skills and expertise, only to have tech bros and billionaires steal from you and your colleagues.
 
The internet did that, offering masses a wealth of information at a fingertip. Before that, only people with imagination and skill could come up with new ideas and inventions. Generative AI takes it to another level. Still, the common man can invest their time into developing the skills and expertise to use this new form of information gathering to enhance their skills and creativity for creating new products.
 
Last edited:
It’s doing a good job getting info from AK. I search here first for pretty much any audio related topic using search and advanced search. Then go to google when nothing is found. Guess what? Bam got my answers in a few seconds AI found it on AK for me. :dunno:
 
eiraved said:
The internet did that, offering masses a wealth of information at a fingertip. Before that, only people with imagination and skill could come up with new ideas and inventions. Generative AI takes it to another level.
Click to expand...

It's that "another level" that troubles me! I believe Hawking felt much the same.


Q
 
Gigantic said:
For the record, I’m not opposed to technology, I’m against IP theft; generative AI is nothing but plagiarism software and would not function without human generated creativity to steal. I find this statement to be on point: “the purpose of AI is to allow wealth access to skill, while removing from the skilled the ability to access wealth.” I’ve relied on my creativity throughout my life as a musician, visual artist, writer and designer; I find the purpose of generative AI to be deeply troubling and offensive, as should anyone who has invested time and effort into developing skills and expertise, only to have tech bros and billionaires steal from you and your colleagues.
Click to expand...
^^^^ Wow! That is really well spoken! I give it FIVE STARS!
 
AI is a collection of info that's been shared.. online or otherwise..

I think it used to be called 'telephone'..
I share something with someone, they share it with someone else, etc..

Let's all hope not too much is lost with each sharing..
 
eiraved said:
The internet did that, offering masses a wealth of information at a fingertip. Before that, only people with imagination and skill could come up with new ideas and inventions. Generative AI takes it to another level. Still, the common man can invest their time into developing the skills and expertise to use this new form of information gathering to enhance their skills and creativity for creating new products.
Click to expand...

Quadman2 said:
For me it's the "little bit on knowledge is a dangerous thing" part that really worries me...and the "what" and to "whom" this "little bit" is shared.


Q
Click to expand...

Hopefully, we all retain a 'little bit' of common sense..
We don't have to believe everything we read or hear, questions help us learn..
We can learn from AI.. Question it, and teach it.. it's who we are, and what we tell it..
It doesn't have a brain or senses, just a collection of information..
It'll adapt only as it's told..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom