• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Any Chance of Repairing a Pair of Wharfedale Super 3 tweeters?

Following with great interest! :lurk:

I've got a re-foamed pair, with one ailing. Guy I bought them from said they were refoamed by someone in Florida (don't know who). The one has a VC problem I think. (It reads open). Also small screwdriver thole through the foam removing it. My damn fault. The other seems fine.
 
Hi, sorry to hear about getting an open reading. Have you tried smelling for a burned smell. I had an old Celestion tweeter that was burned years ago,. still smells of it. I have had drivers read open that were not. Have you tried them (filtered). If it is the voice coil there must be a place to get them made (india maybe, they have an open economy and cash means a lot there), I know the material is widely available, apparently there are copper coated variants specifically because of the solder issue. My coils seem to have a yellow tarnish. Could be resin. Could be anodized aluminium.

Do your drivers have external spiders? Maybe they were all internal and the external was left open. If you have external spiders could you take a photo of them please?

One thing they all seem to share is foam mounted on top of the core, At this age if this is original it is dehydrated, disintegrated and quite hard. Loads in the VC gap of my drivers. Can see how the type with the washer and screw would work as a spider, but what I have seems like a bad idea if that was the only spider.

For surrounds I found a Spirograph wheel (seventies drawing game) is almost perfect as a template. Bit wider outer ring. but only about 1 mm. A close up photo of the top of the driver core. Self adhesive base with foam residue.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN1417.JPG
    DSCN1417.JPG
    49.5 KB · Views: 54
  • DSCN1418.JPG
    DSCN1418.JPG
    96.7 KB · Views: 52
  • DSCN1383.JPG
    DSCN1383.JPG
    133.4 KB · Views: 50
Yes please dig them out, I will help where I can. They are just speakers, the word tweeter and aluminium coil put you off,. But the construction and design are very basic. Also as far as speakers go, the build quality is a definite motivator. If one of your coils are shot I have read that using a coil from a Super 8 RSDD might work. Bit of a false economy though. I just searched for purchasing voice coils, there are options out there,. china looks promising. One even offers custom build minimal order 1. Sent a message asking if they can make Aluminium coils (copper coated). Chinese voice coil or destruction of an 8 RSDD, can hear the purists cringe.. This is of course unless anyone knows of any producer of Aluminium coils in Europe/North America under lets say 20 bucks each. That would be my maximum. These speakers are not posh or complicated. Wharfedale stuck scouring pads on the top of the cores.. Surprised they didn't start a friction fire.
 
I have been looking further into the external spider question If you look at the contact surface where the basket fixes to the driver you can clearly see a difference in oxidation to the surface where the ring of the basket joins. The inside if this ring (driver surface) is as equally oxidised as the outer. This would confirm my suspicion that this never had an external spider, fixing as per original idea of a standard closed external spider will probably change the drivers characteristics. Mine are going to be vertical in Airedales anyway. So I have to assume that the foam pad on the core is a crude spider and possible buffer. Again this would have probably affected characteristics. So I now have to consider heat. Aluminium coils are supposed to dissipate heat quicker, not sure if mine are original coils. Also the venting of the VC gap will most likely be influenced by placing of an (airtight or not) external spider (driver speed/ sensitivity). My guess on heat is that this is limited, the mass of the driver base is a great heat sink. Also the use of aluminium suggests that working temps don't get that hot.

I have loads of these felt and foam self adhesive discs that you use under furniture to stop scratches, they can take a beating, super strong adhesive. I am going to do heat tests and see which one seems the most stable for use as a inner spider/buffer. I think as per Richards conclusions, a thickness of about 3 mm seems in proportion. Then I will just make it the same diameter as the core.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN1414.JPG
    DSCN1414.JPG
    43 KB · Views: 31
Found a cache picture of a Super 3 with core foam pad revealed. Bad quality but approx dimensions are attainable. That puts my mind at rest.

Found perfect diameter synthetic felt pads, approx 3.4 mm singed. Blow torched one after sticking on aluminium foil. Does not burn quickly. After 45 secs you have whats in the photo. Adhesive is still solid. Benefit of this material is that the fibers break off and this material is known for low friction (snooker tables). I have trimmed and singed loose fibers including top surface. Creates a much neater buffer device. I would say a close match in dimensions. The density is maybe a bit higher, but still cushions and will have give with airflow and movement. The cone moves freely but definitely has a feeling of more support. I just can't see the benefit of fitting foam, if we were building this speaker today, we would not use foam but felt. I think it is worth a shot. So I am going to stick these back together and see what happens.
 

Attachments

  • spongebob.jpg
    spongebob.jpg
    42.3 KB · Views: 72
  • DSCN1439.JPG
    DSCN1439.JPG
    101.2 KB · Views: 64
  • DSCN1441.JPG
    DSCN1441.JPG
    74.6 KB · Views: 61
  • DSCN1444.JPG
    DSCN1444.JPG
    72.1 KB · Views: 61
  • DSCN1445.JPG
    DSCN1445.JPG
    85.2 KB · Views: 65
  • DSCN1449.JPG
    DSCN1449.JPG
    103.4 KB · Views: 64
  • DSCN1450.JPG
    DSCN1450.JPG
    70.3 KB · Views: 61
  • DSCN1452.JPG
    DSCN1452.JPG
    34.3 KB · Views: 62
Thank you again for your comments on my website. No need to apologise for the lengthy read, as the following is anything but brief. Please don't consider the following as absolute; it is open to/for discussion. I won't be satisfied until you are and that means those little fellas are working. I've spent weeks with two fellas through PMs, one to repair a a pair of Super 3's and another to find the source of a buzz in his speakers which happened only on one particular piece of music. It turned out to be a lot of low frequency energy in the music coupled with his not realising that the loudness compensation was ON. Another fella shipped 4 Super 3s from the east coast and I fixed them, no charge. Two weren't working and one of those two had an open coil. He insisted I keep those two as payment. They now work and are, in fact, in use, at the bottom piccy in this page. http://www.ln271828.net/coaxial12.html

Yes, Super 3's can be repaired. In fact, I once used a pair of Super 3's in a mid-range horn I designed going down to 400 hz. http://www.ln271828.net/horn-h.htm

After reading subsequent posts, I got the feeling you have the tweeter repair solved. That felt pad looks good; why I didn't think of that is beyond me. I guess it has something to do with keeping certain things as original as possible. It's that nostalgia thing.

I posted the following just because I wrote it and promised the info. As for voice coil temperature, I wouldn't think that coil is going to get very warm unless one plays very loud and for long periods. Since I have the necessary equipment to monitor voice coil temperature, I'll do that using that original aluminum speech coil from a Super 3. Also, as the VC temp rises, resistance and impedance follow, reducing the current drawn and thus the power applied. The result(s) of the aforementioned will be posted in my website and a note to that effect placed here, just fer schitts 'n giggles.

That 3mm foam was used for the center spider; it is, as you say, too thick for the annulus. It not only would raise the cone but also make application of the gasket very difficult. The felt is a much better alternative. I'll try to stick to metric as that seems to be your preference. I've been using both for decades, in whichever situation it's convenient. That brings to mind a 7 UP commercial from waaaay back when the company introduced their one litre bottle. Since the litre is just under 34 US ounces, their slogan was, "It's a quart and a litre bit more." Some young Harvard Business School grad on Madison Ave, N.Y.C. probably got a bonus for that one.

From those photos, they did have a foam (inner) spider that was fixed to the pole piece with an adhesive; earlier models used a foam disk sandwiched between two phenolic washers and a brass screw. If you cut those green felt annuli, you did a nice job. Looking at photo #1379, that unit appears to have a half roll annulus, something I've never seen until now.

The foam disc inside the coil is/was the spider. Cutting one into a circle may be the easier part but getting the right diameter may be a little more difficult, not to mention its centering on the pole piece. However, it isn't impossible. If you prefer that route and can cut a close to circular disc, do so. Make the disc 27.0mm to 27.5mm in diameter and it should fit snugly into the coil. It should overlap the pole piece such that the circumference of the foam disk is midway over the gap. Looking straight down at it while it's on the pole piece, you should see a little of the gap.

An alternative method is to use those spiders you cut to size. Here's a way to center the coil. Make two or three shims using 20 pound paper as it's about 0.003" (0.0762mm) thick. Two such shims will give 0.006" (0.1524mm). The shim width should be at least the width of the inside height of the coil (12mm), a little wider may be preferred (15mm-18mm). The length should be about 79mm; this should fit inside the coil with a 1mm to 2mm gap.

The felt annulus should be fixed to the cone. Now, with the shims inside the coil and the spider one the cone/coil assembly (NOT glued), wiggle the coil onto the pole piece. This can be done with the braided wires still connected to the terminal on the basket but may be easier with them de-soldered from the terminal strip on the basket. If removing these braids, use a small (1 inch) alligator clip as a heat sink. The spider should also be flat, not concave. Once this is achieved, replace two of the screws to hold the basket to the top plate. They don't have to be torqued tight, just enough to lock the basket in place. Once this has been achieved, a couple of drops of glue can be applied to the junction of the spider to the cone/coil junction. Once this glue has set, the assembly can be removed and more glue applied to the spider/apex junction. Once that has set, and with the shims removed, the basket and cone can be replaced with the 4 screws. First apply glue to the place where the spider will join the basket. Glue can now be applied to the outer circumference of the green annulus, fixing it to the basket. The coil should now be centered in the gap.

I've used a similar method to replace diaphragm/coil assemblies in very early Electro-Voice T35 tweeters before the diaphragm assemblies were precision cut to fit inside a ring in the head. SEE http://www.ln271828.net/T35-T350.html

A felt inner spider wouldn't work as it has no horizontal rigidity, not that it needs much but in time, it could allow the coil to drop and touch the pole piece and top plate. (Never considered a thicker piece of felt than that used for the annulus) That is, if the Super 3 is front firing. Upward firing, that wouldn't be a problem. It was suggested by Wharfedale in the 50's that with the foam surround W15FS, the speaker be rotated 180 degrees every several months as the heavy cone would drop in front, tilting the coil and causing it to rub inside the gap.

That coil appears to be aluminum despite the enamel coating. First, if I'm correct, ALL Super 3s had aluminum coils and if that was changed, it probably didn't happen until the mid to late 60's, maybe later. The two piccies attached are of an original Super 3 coil and a Super 8 FS/AL. The white can be seen as being aluminum coated with a silk type insulation. How that was done on such a delicate wire is beyond me. My half brother, back in 1957, jokingly told me that Wharfedale had well trained spiders on the payroll. The darker one came from a Super 8 FS/AL and is enamel coated aluminum. At the time, I couldn't solder aluminum by conventional methods as per copper so I hand wound coils and kept the aluminum wire, just in case of ......... whatever. I now have aluminum solder and flux.

Robert
 
Amazing projects Robert, inspiring and engagingly presented. Thank you for the detailed response, great to hear about the voice coils likely to be original. The Metric measurements help with being sure. Fortunately luck helped. The pads I used are 27mm but after pressing onto the pole piece they bellowed out a tiny bit. I can feel very slight contact between the pad and coil.

I was thinking of how to center without cutting the cap if I had to fix the external spider That is brilliant. Someone will definitely be able to make use of that. I am almost positive the driver wants to work. It has been stuck in Italy all of it's life. The proportions of everything I have done just feel right. Interesting the anecdotes and experiences. I love reading stuff like that. I have had some luck re-centering speaker sag on a few drivers. Re-gluing surrounds whilst the speaker is operating on its back. I have just finished gluing the felt annulus to the cones. The cones are sitting straight to eye and wants to be in position because of the braids. Tested and they still test good, 9.6 and 9.4 dcr. About the felt pad I used. The horizontal rigidity or shear strength is quite high including the adhesive. We use these under wooden kitchen chairs to protect the wooden floors. It is also less likely to compress with heat stress and retain its volume for longer. That might be a negative in that maybe the compression properties of foam were chosen specifically to create softer influence. I don't have a reference for how they should sound, but do know how they shouldn't. Of course technical testing would be better. Don't have the tools to do response tests. So in my case low tech and correct until happy. I would be very interested in any tests regarding coil temperature. Fantastic that you are sharing your experience with us. I am also surprised how far I have come thanks to forums like this with under 5 dollars worth of material. The roll surround my drivers came with were some kind of organic rubber. It was the type that gets greasy as it deteriorates. My guess is this was fitted about 20 years ago in Italy. I was thinking the same people might have replaced coils and possibly even cones,. There are markings on the underside of the cones in white pencil like other Wharfedale units. The year date must be 62. The felt is a great replacement choice. I found a cutting board worked well. I will update with pictures for others. Now we need to see about coils. I understand that some people want to restore to as original as possible. But others have would be happy to just have functioning characterful drivers. Seen a lot of super 3's that need a complete overhaul on the interweb. It would be great if a source could be found for the coils and cones.
 
Last edited:
My drivers are back in working condition. The felt pad worked out perfectly. I have been doing sound tests throughout the final fitting of the outer annulus. Very happy with the sensitivity, even at super low volume there is clear definition. Have been running them from 5000 c/s, bell like clarity, sharp stops, my hearing started resonating at high volume, a level these would never be used at, the cones seem to act more like a pick up. I have heard people refer to these as flat by today's standards,. I just had harmonic distortion in my inner ear due to very loud HF, piercing like knives, definitely not flat on delivery or upper range. The surrounds worked out well, good neutral tension mainly because of the small proportions. I took photos mostly because I myself use others photo's all the time for reference. If there are too many feel free to delete. These are going in a set of Airedales with a W15rs 8rsdd and external crossover CR3 2. I had a question to Robert if you get this. I have heard that the Super 8 RSDD has the same coil as the Super 3. Would you happen to know if it also has an inner foam spider pad? Also in the picture is a mounting disc that these tweeters came with, on the back is a plastic cup that completely seals the back of the driver. Seen similar things from Acoustic Research for after market driver upgrades from the factory. Anyone know what it is? Thank you Robert for helping and giving me pointers, the one person qualified, very cool.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN1455.JPG
    DSCN1455.JPG
    69.2 KB · Views: 61
  • DSCN1456.JPG
    DSCN1456.JPG
    60.7 KB · Views: 57
  • DSCN1467.JPG
    DSCN1467.JPG
    71.5 KB · Views: 58
  • DSCN1470.JPG
    DSCN1470.JPG
    55.1 KB · Views: 61
  • DSCN1478.JPG
    DSCN1478.JPG
    66.6 KB · Views: 58
  • DSCN1484.JPG
    DSCN1484.JPG
    59.4 KB · Views: 57
  • DSCN1487.JPG
    DSCN1487.JPG
    121 KB · Views: 62
  • DSCN1505.JPG
    DSCN1505.JPG
    117.7 KB · Views: 63
  • DSCN1508.JPG
    DSCN1508.JPG
    94 KB · Views: 61
  • DSCN1509.JPG
    DSCN1509.JPG
    81.6 KB · Views: 59
Last pictures including mounting disc that came with the drivers.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN1510.JPG
    DSCN1510.JPG
    83.9 KB · Views: 43
  • DSCN1517.JPG
    DSCN1517.JPG
    101.3 KB · Views: 43
  • DSCN1518.JPG
    DSCN1518.JPG
    67.4 KB · Views: 43
  • DSCN1520.JPG
    DSCN1520.JPG
    86.9 KB · Views: 48
  • DSCN1521.JPG
    DSCN1521.JPG
    108.8 KB · Views: 44
My drivers are back in working condition. The felt pad worked out perfectly. I have been doing sound tests throughout the final fitting of the outer annulus. Very happy with the sensitivity, even at super low volume there is clear definition. Have been running them from 5000 c/s, bell like clarity, sharp stops, my hearing started resonating at high volume, a level these would never be used at, the cones seem to act more like a pick up. I have heard people refer to these as flat by today's standards,. I just had harmonic distortion in my inner ear due to very loud HF, piercing like knives, definitely not flat on delivery or upper range. The surrounds worked out well, good neutral tension mainly because of the small proportions. I took photos mostly because I myself use others photo's all the time for reference. If there are too many feel free to delete. These are going in a set of Airedales with a W15rs 8rsdd and external crossover CR3 2. I had a question to Robert if you get this. I have heard that the Super 8 RSDD has the same coil as the Super 3. Would you happen to know if it also has an inner foam spider pad? Also in the picture is a mounting disc that these tweeters came with, on the back is a plastic cup that completely seals the back of the driver. Seen similar things from Acoustic Research for after market driver upgrades from the factory. Anyone know what it is? Thank you Robert for helping and giving me pointers, the one person qualified, very cool.



So happy you're successful in your endeavor. While a good Super 3 may have a response flat +/- 4 dB, it doesn't deviate very far from most of today's better tweeters that are usually +/- 2 dB, and that's somewhat rare. Consider the Klipschorn with peak to trough variations of 10 dB (+/- 5) yet many will not find fault with that. After 70 years, Klipsch & Associates still make the venerable and legendary Klipschorn. There are more things to consider than how flat the response is. The bandwidth of the peaks or troughs is more noticeable than the peak itself. Consider a bad peak of say, +5dB at around 3000 hz and that peak is between say 2900 and 3100. It would not be as noticeable as a peak of 2 to 3 dB, centered at 3000 hz and covering a half to a full octave on either side.

As for the Super 8 RS/DD, I have not had one in my possession although I am looking for one. If I may expound on a S.W.A.G. (Scientific Wild Ass Guess), I'd say the coil is a little longer than that of the Super 3 due to its requirement at reproducing much lower frequencies and would need a longer Xmax. I would also bet on it's having an aluminum voice coil but that may be another SWAG. regarding the inner foam spider, I would doubt that as I have not seen any Super 8 with such a spider. The very early ones had a phenolic spider and later probably went to the woven & corrugated type.

The cup- (chamber) sealing the back of the tweeter is absolutely necessary in a sealed or vented cabinet. As the woofer moves, pressure variations in the cabinet will try to relieve themselves any way they can and destroy such a small speaker. In an open cabinet, like the SFB series, that isn't necessary. In fact, many will argue that the best tweeters are in the open, provided the cone diameter is larger than the wavelength of the lowest frequency being reproduced. At 5khz, the wavelength is 2.72" (69mm) just about the diameter of the tweeter cone and annulus and basket so there would be no doublet action above 5 kHz. That a cancellation which happens when the front wave radiates outward to meet the 180 degree reversed phase wave emanating from the back of the cone.

On sealed back mids and tweets in a cabinet. Essentially, the mid or tweeter will behave like a passive radiator for a short period as the cones will probably be thrust far beyond their Xmax. Consider a 10 inch woofer and a 3 inch tweeter with an open back in a sealed cabinet. The areas of each diaphragm is approximately 56 sq. in. and 7 sq. in, respectively. (919 cm^2 and 115 cm^2) If the larger diaphragm were to move as little as 1mm, it would force the smaller diaphragm to move 8mm, far beyond the limit of a Super 8 much less a Super 3.

Seems I touched on the Super 8s in that web link I posted. http://www.ln271828.net/super3tidbits.html
Oh, you did a wonderful job on those tweeters, especially the perfect circle annuli. I see you use the same small clamps I do and that you have the orange and blue alternating. Was that by chance or deliberate? I'd have done it deliberately just for schitts & giggles.

Robert
 
Robert thank you, what a fantastic resource. Such dedication to detail. Sorry for the somewhat delayed response. I have fallen for these old drivers. Gotten the Airedales up and running. I was afraid some of the reviews might have been true, saying that the design does not make sense and was a bit of a sales gimmick. Well I can conclude they were wrong. I can see how if the drivers are not adjusted to each other how it could sound messy. Maybe also down to a slightly different crossover, @ 800 not 400 c/s. They sound stunning, very open baffle and the enclosure for the 15" creates no dead space between the upright 8" and super 3, . Also surprised how well the 8" RD DD works with the super 3. Thanks for that detailed info on how the super 3 measures up incl. temperature that is quality. Will be returning to your website frequently. Those tiny cones with the roll surround look great, they will no doubt one day rescue a pair of Super 3's. Would they perhaps be for SFB super 3's? Also do you know why there are some Super 3's with 13000 lines and others with 14500? Maybe different models?
 
Academically, the design may not seem to make sense but by the same token, many academically designed 'state of the art' systems don't all sound good.


In a design such as the SFB, as long as the baffle on which the speaker is mounted is longer and wider than the wavelength of the lowest frequency being produced, doublet action doesn't occur. That's a cancellation of the pressure wave emanating from the front of the speaker versus its opposite emanating from the back. In a closed box, this action won't happen but others do. Regarding the woofer, the wavelengths are too long to design such a baffle but that's when speaker placement comes into play. The room is a very integral part of the system. (Consider the Magnepans) I've heard many argue against that to which I suggest they take their speakers from the listening room into the bathroom and tell me they sound the same, for if they do, they'd better make an appointment with an otolaryngologist. (ear doctor) Based on the doublet action discussion, changing the crossover frequency from 800 to 400 may be worthy of consideration. Going the other way shouldn't be a problem as the W15FS does well to 800hz. Then, it all depends on your preference.


Those roll surround cones are after market, not Wharfedale unless Wharfedale used such an annulus in much later designs.

You opened a Pandora's Box making mention of the 13000 and 14500 lines. I never noticed that despite my having about 8 Super 3s, three of which have readable labels on the back and S.A.S. (sure as schitt), three are different, 13000 & 14500. Fortunately, the 13000 one is the one with an open solder joint in a long ago futile attempt to solder aluminum. So, I took the little fella apart and made some measurements on the magnet assembly. The gap is about 0.047" and the hole in the top plate is 1.093", making the pole piece 0.999". Actually, it is most likely 1 inch. The replacement Waldom coil for that speaker specifies an inside diameter of 1.022", which gives a gap between the inside of the coil form and the pole piece of 0.011", kind of large for a tweeter, especially one of such vintage when 30 watts was considered to be an arc welder. A similar gap exists between the outside of the coil to the top plate. Speakers back then were very efficient and could easily yield 90dB 1w1m, which means 30 watts would produce an ear shattering 105 dB. With a 30w per channel stereo system, that would be 111 dB.

So, back to the seemingly wide gap in the tweeter magnet. Wharfedale may have made that narrower to increase the flux density in the gap, the end result being a little more SPL as well as better transient response. The speaker I disassembled is 13000. The 14500 was repaired in 1971 with a Waldom voice coil. If I can grind an offset (90 degree) screwdriver to fit under the basket, I can remove the basket and cone & coil assembly without damaging the speaker. This will allow making measurements on the magnet assembly.

Robert.
 
Hey Robert,

While I have absolutely no idea what your new page is about, thank you so much for taking the time to lay all that down. It's not very often that not only does someone understand the math and engineering behind loudspeaker drivers, but is willing to share his or her findings with the huddled masses.

I've still got a few or more ceramic Super 3's in my stash, maybe an Alnico or two (I know I have one Alnico that needs repairs). After successfully getting a pair up on my Stephens Trusonic project, I will most certainly be keeping what I have for future projects.

Biggles

RichardIII058.jpg
 
Hi Robert, thanks for the very interesting read. Those measurements for the moving coil are good to have especially as you also verified them. Also nice to read that even though these old drivers might not be as accurate, that might be what makes them sound better to some of us. I have seen 3 versions of the super 3, the SFB version being the 3rd. Apparently these drivers had higher specs. I am slowly gathering the ingredients to try a SFB3 design, I have alnico W12fs (not sfb) and either 13000 or 14500 super 3's. Would you happen to have any info on the Super 3 SFB (pic below)? The problem with being aware of how nice these drivers are, is then not being able to leave them if you see a good offer.

Your tech capabilities are inspiring, the equipment is fascinating. Lab equipment can be found surprisingly cheap. Having the know how to use it though is somewhat intimidating, seeing the general concept and how you work is helpful. Here in Holland, Philips made literature for the general public to encourage enthusiasts in the 70's. I have some of their breadboard kits. They also encouraged speaker design, I have a book on acoustics from Philips. The Acoustic element of Hi-Fi is fascinating, something very natural sounding about these old drivers. They also seem very versatile.

The Airedales have surprised me, I purchased the gutted cabinets for 25 Euro's. No crossovers. I acquired two Wharfedale separator unit crossovers, they are filled with wax, this was because I needed crossovers, these would give me some flexibility with other potential setups if the Airedales didn't sound right. The drivers literally came in from Rome, New York, London and Amsterdam. The Dcr on the two cabinets 12.6 and 12.4 rsp., they sound balanced and the upward firing drivers don't stick out like I thought they would. I will try the cross at 400 cycles sometime. Was thinking of a way to set that up. I know a lot of people use simulated crossover software. The original Airedale crossovers had massive chokes. I have been unable to see what is in the crossover separator boxes because of the wax. I am reluctant to try and remove the wax as they are rather minty and apparently have oil/paper caps. I was reading up about open baffle designs and how different manufacturers tried different methods to get the lower end more audible in relation to the mid. The one constant being the floor. The bass drivers on Airedales are low to the ground, they have the angular reflex vented cabinet with a further empty non-vented chamber above, the whole cabinet does a disappearing act when run on a valve amp. The adjustable gain on the two upper drivers helps balance them out and probably the weak link responsible for others giving this design a less favorable review. I also had some luck solving a loose connection on an aluminium braid on a W15, I remember reading something about mechanical joints also work. The weak spot was where the braid goes through the cone on the outside. I made a trough with aluminium foil and used 40% tin solder. It worked very well, also thanks to the Heat sink tip. This is all great stuff if it brings some given up on drivers back to life.

Apparently some standard 13000 line super 3's were also fitted in some SFB3's, maybe the kit versions or maybe the North American versions. Or maybe they were all kit versions and they just had supply problems. I for one would like to know more about this SFB/3 Model. Two pics below, the SFB/3 driver is from a Japanese located set of original SFB3's. The others are in a set that looks like it was on the tail end of the products manufacturing life. Cheaper produced cabinet. from an AK thread.

@ Biggles, That driver housing looks good, such a clean solution.
 

Attachments

  • SFBSUPER31.jpg
    SFBSUPER31.jpg
    59.9 KB · Views: 30
  • SFBSUPER32.jpg
    SFBSUPER32.jpg
    79.1 KB · Views: 27
Last edited:
Thanks for posting this thread! I really appreciate all the info and great pictures you guys! Lots of knowledge on this one and many hours of trial and error. Can't wait have a pair of Wharf's some day...
Happy listening!
 
Thanks, Mr. Soundman. I felt much the same as you about finding this thread which was started about a year ago by bce22 but he disappeared shortly thereafter. Gonna PM him to find out if he got those tweeters working.
Robert.
 
Back
Top Bottom