• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Any Experience w Ebayer 'hifiaudio-' Need volume pot for HK A300

One channel section is log and another is anti-log
sure, but what`s the purpose to make it so complicated and to use an obviously more expensive part? the competition was very strong at that time. none of my business, but you have an interesring profile pic.
 
I owned 2 of them before moving to USA, plus I worked at the shop that specialized in the brand. One member here I visited in Florida has Lada that was imported from Hungary.
 
you are right and in most cases it is indeed audio/logarithmic. yet there`s an opinion that nobody either confirmed or denied, that in 50s and 60s log pots were more expensive to manufacture, so sometimes linear pots with 2 extra legs were used, 1 leg for loudness and 2nd as a law-faking to make it pseudo-logarithmic. HK Citation I that I posted earlier looks like it, 100K resistor attached to the second leg seems to be law-faking. but I`m not sure, that`s why I`m so persistent in hope to hear notions of those who have more experience. I made a linear potentiometer for HK and it works fine, volume adjusts progressively as if it was logarithmic, but I`m not so sure with the Scott-130, because it is clear that both legs in it`s original pot are engaged in loudness function.
 
Kind of a pain to get it out of the system but would it be of use to take some measurements of mine in circuit?
 
I bought a volume control for my Ma230 from this person. Paid top dollar was not impressed. It was noisy and had dead spots. I wouldn't buy from them again.
 
I modeled the Scott volume control in LTSPICE to see how it behaves with the loudness switch in the normal position. That is to say, the caps are out of the circuit, and each of the two taps has a resistor to ground. Here are the basic numbers at a few points. The voltage numbers assume 1V is applied at the top of the pot and that rotation percent and resistance are linearily related. For example, at 10% rotation, the wiper is assumed to be 50K above ground:


Screenshot 2026-01-16 at 5.04.58 PM.png

It's clear from this that the circuit does indeed mimic a log taper pot if the actual taper is linear. In fact, it's very similar to the ALPS 15A taper shown in my post HERE. Based on this, it would be functionally impractical to use a log pot in this position with taps, but replacing it with one lacking taps would certainly require log taper.

Jack
 
Back
Top Bottom