radioactive
tube gear fanatic
I didnt see that one but did see a 255 sell for 1200.And to add to teh list a single 260 amp sold a few days ago on ebay - it wa sfarily steep though at $`1200
I didnt see that one but did see a 255 sell for 1200.And to add to teh list a single 260 amp sold a few days ago on ebay - it wa sfarily steep though at $`1200
By all means give it a spin! It is an interesting arm for sure. That arm would probably like an old Shure M3 or M7 cartridge. I really think the design of these things, they are beautiful but wasn't the best tracking arm I've ever had. Looks great with your 401 by the way! Let us know how it sounds.
Do you know of any modern cartridges that would work with this tonearm or am I going to be looking for something used.By all means give it a spin! It is an interesting arm for sure. That arm would probably like an old Shure M3 or M7 cartridge. I really think the design of these things, they are beautiful but wasn't the best tracking arm I've ever had. Looks great with your 401 by the way! Let us know how it sounds.
I would consider one of the heavier tracking Denons, eg, the 103 line if you have moving coil capability. As for Moving Magnet/Iron some of the Shure DJ cartridges M44-7, SC35C might be good matches and reasonably priced. If you could find a new Stanton 500/680 or Grado DJ 100 or 200 cartridge they might work nicely with that arm. Just some ideas off the top of my head. Others here might have some suggestions for you as well.Do you know of any modern cartridges that would work with this tonearm or am I going to be looking for something used.
Thanks for the help, am I looking for a P-mount or 1/2" for this tonearm. I'm fairly unfamiliar with it.I would consider one of the heavier tracking Denons, eg, the 103 line if you have moving coil capability. As for Moving Magnet/Iron some of the Shure DJ cartridges M44-7, SC35C might be good matches and reasonably priced. If you could find a new Stanton 500/680 or Grado DJ 100 or 200 cartridge they might work nicely with that arm. Just some ideas off the top of my head. Others here might have some suggestions for you as well.
I don't think I will be playing all that many 78's on this set up, how would I know if I have the capability to use a moving coil cartridge?If you use P-Mount you will need to make sure you have the 1/2 inch adapter. I do not know if there are any p-mounts that would necessarily be appropriate with that arm unless Ortofon has something in their DJ series. Probably best to stick with regular 1/2". You might want to try the inexpensive SC35C there are other styli you could swap as well on that one, for example if you wanted to play 78's.
Looks like the predecessor to the fairchild 440 style.Another Fairchild 412 w/Grado arm
Looks like a higher serial number. Haven't seen that variation of the "trapazoid" plinth.
Looked up your receiver and it looks like you only have a moving magnet input so a moving coil would be out unless you also invested in a step up transformers or an external Phono stage with moving coil capability. I would recommend the Shure SC35C, Stanton 500 or 600 series cartridges as ones you should be able to find new since you indicated you would like to try a new cartridge. Stanton has ceased making cartridges but believe they can still be found new if you look around. The Shure is still the least expensive option and would be a good way to try out your arm without spending a lot of $.I don't think I will be playing all that many 78's on this set up, how would I know if I have the capability to use a moving coil cartridge?
The amplifier is a Rotel RX-454 that has a phono pre amp built in and I'm looking for a set of bookshelf speakers to finish it off.
Any prefernce between the 412 and 412-2 sound-wise? I think the 45 capability is a plus on the 412-2 (at least fro me), but what other things should one consider?
Another Fairchild 412 w/Grado arm
Looks like a higher serial number. Haven't seen that variation of the "trapazoid" plinth.
The 412-1 has the same stepped platter as the 412-2. It just doesn't have the sort of wonky mechanical mechanism to move the belt between steps.
I do not believe this is correct based on the 412-2s I've owned.
Have you verified that the TT will run at 45 RPM using the method you describe?
I'll fire one up to check it, but the platters look the same from the pictures I've seen.