vegabass25
Awesome AK member.
Pink floyd is one ive really noticed.
I mentioned Talk Talk earlier in this thread. I agree 100% Even the early stuff is great (especially when compared with with the other synth pop that was coming out early in their career), but their last 3 albums are really something - especially on a good system. :yes:
. I think the CD will do. It appears the secret's out on those out of print LPs.:yes:
mine too
I still think of Power Windows and Hold Your Fire as "new" Rush. Both had great tours too. And yes, it's nice that they grew and matured rather than just crank out the same stuff over and over. Can't say I like all of it (nobody's hero was completely unnecessary) but I love most of it.
Refined, polished, rocking, excellent lyrics, great vocals/dynamics...have you heard it on the SnA tour? WoW! Interesting point you make, but I ask you this. Given the huge amount of great music that has been released over the years, why should anyone but the most devoted fans of a group care about a band that has declined creatively? Why spend time listening to "mediocre but listenable" records when there are undiscovered masterpieces out there?
Though it was confusingly stated I admit. :scratch2:
My answer: Because if a band is your favorite, then it is likely that their mediocre output will equal or even surpass any other band's best output (in your estimation).
This is how it is with Rush for me, their mediocre output is only mediocre in terms of THEIR talents, it is usually AS good and much of the time BETTER than any other band's BEST output that I listen to. Often when I'm listening to other bands (and I listen to many, really I do) I think to myself: "Why am I listening to this? I could be listening to Rush, even one of their "lessor" albums I haven't listened to in awhile", and then, upon that consideration, I switch to Rush and am glad for doing so.
it's because THAT'S how much I love Rush! I'd most often rather listen to their "bad" material that I don't like as much as their rest
As for all these "undiscovered masterpieces"; where are they? :scratch2: I'm constantly looking out for new music (either new or overlooked old music) and have tried band after band after album after album of supposedly "unknown jewels" that have turned out to be unlistenable at worst and mediocre (in overall terms) at best. SOMETIMES I do find something I've overlooked or did not know about/get into enough before and it's worth listening to or even pretty good, but usually not.
Well, you sound like a pretty devoted fan of Rush to me. I must admit that Rush dropped off my radar sometime in the mid 80s, but I certainly do not begrudge you the joy that they give you as they are clearly your favorite band. After 33 years of collecting and listening to music, I cannot say that any one rock group has had that kind of staying power for me, to the extent that I listen to it every day.
As for "undiscovered masterpieces", I would point out that you would not have discovered Rush had you not decided to try something new at some point in your life. Though it doesn't happen every day, I have found things that somehow eluded me back in the day, sometimes very old stuff. Last year I went on a blues jag, and wound up picking up a pile of stuff from John Lee Hooker, Albert King, Buddy Guy, and Muddy Waters. 3 or 4 years ago, the only Bob Marley I had was Legend. Long story short, eventually wound up buying all his Island studio sessions and his two live albums, and, IMO, every one of them is great, and at least 3 or 4 of them are masterpieces. Around the same time, started to listen more to Leonard Cohen. Same thing, eventually bought his back catalog. Among more contemporary bands, 2 years ago, had never heard of the Decemberists. After seeing them on Austin City Limits, picked up their record Crane Wife. Today, I have all 5 full length cds, and one ep. These guys are tremendous!
This is just the world of rock and pop music. The world of jazz is, IMO, even richer in that it is older than rock, the musical palette is much greater, and the level of virtuosity of the musicians smokes all but the very best rock performers. 15 years ago, I knew little about jazz, except for maybe the names of the iconic performers, Miles, Trane, Bird, Duke, and Diz. Today, maybe 60% of my collection is modern jazz.
Now, 10 or 15 years ago I could have said to myself that I would just stick with my old favorites from high school, college, and my young adult life. After all, why take a chance on something new when I could be enjoying classic rock, punk, 80s alternative/indie music? My answer is that the pleasure of discovering something new is far, far greater than hearing an old favorite for the 400 or 500th time.
Crazy. I picked up The Colour of Spring on vinyl like a month ago for $8.

The Police.
Ah, yes, of course! :scratch2:
Synchronicity is by far their best album, and one of the great albums overall. :thmbsp:
Also, I picked up The Party's Over and It's My Life today on vinyl for $5.99 a pop.![]()
Ah, yes, of course! :scratch2:
Synchronicity is by far their best album, and one of the great albums overall. :thmbsp:
I always thought "Synchronicity" was overhyped. Give me "Regatta De Blanc" or "Zenyatta Mondatta" anyday. Also, for the record, I don't know if they got better, but were always great and stayed great, with a slight dip-down at the end. My opinion, of course.
I'm partial to Ghost in the Machine. But I do love Synchronicity. I love all their records, but the last two are a huge leap forward in quality IMHO.
I like Synchronicity the best because for me there's not one bad song on that album and every other Police album does have a bad song or two (even Ghost).
It also seems to flow together well as an album.
All of this is just a matter of opinion of course, and I admit that Ghost is a close second and that all of the albums contain classics.
For the record my favorite Police song is "Invisible Sun". Nice bass for subs in that one!![]()