That's funny Terry, great post.
Hey All,
I'd love some recommendations for high efficiency speakers. I'd be running them out of a Miniwatt N3 (3.5wpc) with a MF V-Dac w/Macbook Pro as the source.
The Zus seem to be an oddly polarizing speaker. In all honesty, I have a hard time understanding the hostility. I've read a number of threads and the negative opinions just don't line up with what I've heard. "I found they had an amazing lack of bass, terrible imaging, shrill, phasey, driving an icepick into your ears sound." I have a hard time believing we were listening to even similar speakers! The Omens were quite bassy and not at all shrill or phasey. The imaging was less than pinpoint precise, but they threw a stable center image and a had plenty of soundstage for me. I guess I have relatively untrained ears by virtue of my age, but I've heard a lot of great (and terrible) audio gear in my life. Some of it was definitely better than the Zu stuff, but all so at a much higher price.
I totally understand the quest for absolute tonal fidelity, but given the starting point of my amp, its not a realistic goal for this particular set up. When I heard the Omens with the MiniWatt, I had a great time! Listening was fun. I really enjoyed them. I'm totally open to other options, but I'd love to head off the relentless Zu negativity I've run into on this forum. Aural preference is a very real thing and debating it on the internet just gets everyone pissed off. Studio monitors aren't my thing. I've heard them and moved on. They have their place, but my dorm room isn't it.
The Wharfedales sound really great. I'll keep my eye out for them. Where's the best place to look for something of that nature?
The ADS look pretty great too. That particular model looks absolutely huge, but a smaller model would be a definite contender. My father grew up of ADS and Mac, so I'm well aware of their excellence. I'll keep my eye open for a pair of those.
Thanks for all of the help guys!
Not a bad idea! Forgot about those -- ruthlessly efficient, and sound nice. Made during an era when efficient speakers were no longer the norm, they weren't as popular as Wharfedale had hoped, so they go cheaper than they should (at least they used to). The footprint on them would be just about right for you, too. If I was in your situation, I think I'd keep on the lookout for a pair from this series -- much nicer sound than many mentioned here, IMHO.![]()
That poses a big challenge, because what sounds good to one person might not have something that another likes. And rooms play a massive part in the sound reaching listeners ears. The same speaker can sound different in 20 different rooms.Hey All,
I'd love some recommendations for high efficiency speakers. I'd be running them out of a Miniwatt N3 (3.5wpc) with a MF V-Dac w/Macbook Pro as the source.
I've heard mixed reviews of the Zu line. The Omen seems like a good option, but I don't want to end up with something bad. The Klipsch series is pretty high efficiency, but the horn loaded tweeter worries me a bit. Also, there doesn't seem to much in the way of info on them.
I'd love to keep the price at or below $1000. I'm only 16, so a $250,000 Avantgarde set-up probably isn't ideal just yet.
Thanks
Walker
Edit: They'd be in a very small dorm room (think 10x10 or maybe 15x10.) In addition, I'm stranded in the woods of New Hampshire, so auditioning isn't possible.
Don't you hate that? Why would I want the phone to spell for me? I paid for the phone and ONLY I will choose the words' spelling!
I think that my Polk Monitor 30's and PSW10 subwoofer might do well with a low powered unit because the sub is self powered (50 watts). The space required is less than you would need with a larger floor standing system. I'm using them in a 12x14 room, the Monitor 30 speakers are wall mounted and the sub woofer fits in the stereo cabinet. The sub-woofer takes up some space, but it's not too big. Just a thought.