Trivia- Back when the cap coupled receivers were made, caps were really inexpensive. My guess is because receiver manufacturers probably contracted with only one or two cap companies for most of their needs, they got 'em even cheaper. I'm not talking about higher quantities of a single part, but a deal for an entire group of parts. Going with cap coupling meant a slightly cheaper power supply and generally low complexity. It was done for economy and I'd be surprised if it was ever touted for sound quality, internally or in the marketplace. It's just a pleasant surprise that today we find the sound has its own qualities that many prefer.
I don't know if this is paranoia or has ever happened, but I can imagine a scenario where an output cap sits at half the supply voltage for decades. Over time, exceeding that voltage will cause increased leakage and failure if the cap doesn't reform. At a certain age reforming might be a long process. Now, let's say the high side output transistor in the old amp fails and shorts. The cap now sees the full supply voltage that it used to be rated for, but can no longer handle. Goodbye woofer perhaps? As I say, it might be paranoia, but if the caps can't be tested to full voltage, it makes a lot of sense to replace them. BTW, even though the signal might swing the full supply voltage, the cap never sees that- it passes the audio frequencies. Technically, you could use a 30 volt cap with a 60 volt supply, though no sane person would.