dnewma04
The Healer
I prefer analogue because it was designed to reproduce sound, and digital was designed to reproduce 0's and 1's.
I might have just found something funnier than Mitch Hedberg. It's almost sig worthy.
I prefer analogue because it was designed to reproduce sound, and digital was designed to reproduce 0's and 1's.
I might have just found something funnier than Mitch Hedberg. It's almost sig worthy.
A CD simply being digital bits of information on a cheap plastic disc, IMO the best CD player is one that removes the mechanical elements completely, which takes the disc out of the equation. The audio information is not altered or harmed in any way by transferring it to a centralized database on the computer. After which you can focus on giving your computer the best DAC possible, of which there is quite a selection available. That would be the ultimate CD player, IMO, and the best part being that your CD's can spend their entire life scratch-free on the shelf after you copy them to the computer one time.
I'm noticing that some of you who have switched over to the hard drive/DAC system don't seem to understand that many of us don't care if the CD is pronounced dead, and have no interest in the PC route regardless of what "the way of the future" is. Personally, I don't have any issues with storing, holding, and using the physical medium myself, and if you have a great CD player, I don't think you're missing much unless we're talking about hi-resolution files.
I'm noticing that some of you who have switched over to the hard drive/DAC system don't seem to understand that many of us don't care if the CD is pronounced dead, and have no interest in the PC route regardless of what "the way of the future" is. Personally, I don't have any issues with storing, holding, and using the physical medium myself, and if you have a great CD player, I don't think you're missing much unless we're talking about hi-resolution files.
As for the OP, I'd look at the usual suspects: NAD, Cambridge, perhaps Rotel. If you can swing $500 to get a used Rega Apollo then definitely go for it.
i might have just found something funnier than mitch hedberg. It's almost sig worthy.
Dave you forgot Marantz...:tears:
I tend to agree with you and I really cannot think up some of this stuff...:scratch2:
I'm noticing that some of you who have switched over to the hard drive/DAC system don't seem to understand that many of us don't care if the CD is pronounced dead, and have no interest in the PC route regardless of what "the way of the future" is. Personally, I don't have any issues with storing, holding, and using the physical medium myself, and if you have a great CD player, I don't think you're missing much unless we're talking about hi-resolution files.
As for the OP, I'd look at the usual suspects: NAD, Cambridge, perhaps Rotel. If you can swing $500 to get a used Rega Apollo then definitely go for it.
In their respective price ranges, I have always preferred Arcam CDPs to the alternatives on the market. Not sure if there are any local dealers for you, though.
Thanks for all the great posts. What makes each of these cdp's good? the DAC? what spec's to look for i guess is my question?
It isn't neccessarily a binary decision.
Many folks use and enjoy digital encoded music (or video) stored on various types of media.
I am borrowing my friends Marantz SA-1 SACD player....all i can say is whoa....
Its like there has been a veil on my music that I never knew was there until I used this CDP.
I just made up my mind...my player that i get has to be this or better....no way am i going with anything subpar of this.