Bill Ferris
Lunatic Member
Yes, Bill, it's always a fascinating exercise trying to describe these matters. It can be fun, but it's mostly frustrating, so I share your pain.
Thanks wyn, Sir.

Yes, Bill, it's always a fascinating exercise trying to describe these matters. It can be fun, but it's mostly frustrating, so I share your pain.

That, is exactly the point, and the use of such signals is highly deceptive.High rise/fall time square waves, even at a low rep rate, have lots of HF content in the edges, and these can generate anomalous behavior in an audio cable that would never show up with signals bandlimited to just audio frequencies.
Absolutely. All one has to do is listen to the effects.No mystery here..,
Having the modeling ability offers some predictive and corrective capability that listening may not offer, or may offer with reduced convenience.Absolutely. All one has to do is listen to the effects.![]()
Perhaps you're thinking of Polk Cobra or Goertz cable which have wonderfully low values of L at the expense of high values of C. They have caused some amplifiers to oscillate without the use of a Zoebel network as discussed in Nelson Pass' cable test from forty years ago.For some reason, I've always been cautious of sandwiched flat wire designs as the one they're pushing. I can't specifically remember why, though. Maybe someone can?

I would also argue that transparency is inherently measurable- using a many tone input and assessing the SINAD of the system.I would like to see a company like Nordost take their complete metrics and show what they do compared to the same metrics for other types of cabling. I want to see measurements that show me their cable is “transparent” and not just a tuned filter affecting the overall tone.