This thread was deleted by Clay, but will be reinstated in 'Closed' form, for purposes of education.
The OP looks innocent enough, unless you know about the controversy it refers to. If you Google Chick-fil-a right now, the first items that come up are all about a current political storm surrounding the company. The issue is about people and civil rights, like the post alludes to.
An innocent-looking post that incites a controversy? One of the classic tricks of a troll, designed to cause trouble for the mod staff while allowing the troll to claim astonished innocence as the membership melts down.
In a court of law, you lose your freedom only if they can prove the case against you beyond a reasonable doubt. On AK, the worst you can get is banned, and since you have no actual right to be here, we get to use common sense instead of absolute proof. In the court of common sense, the OP is a troll post, as the responses in the thread make obvious.
When we find someone trolling, the first thing that happens is that we review all his posts to see if there's a pattern. In this case, there is. Being a Subscriber doesn't help you at all. The result is that the troll receives his first and only warning... and here it is now:
To the OP, you have been placed on our list of active trolls. You've had your only warning. Next time you'll be suspended, and thereafter another instance will get you banned, permanently, with no appeal. Your Subscription price will NOT be refunded, so if you value it, quit trolling.