Some people here need to not get caught up in how things are named and what they actually are. Technics used a method that they called "New Class A", even though it was really just another Class AB amplifier with very little distortion due to the output transistors always being on and idling even when not in use. But the amplifer was not true Class A. Still very good and I like those amps but there is a difference. JVC had "Super A" and I beleive Fisher had something called "Class A II". But none of them where actual Class A amplifiers. And I do understand that some amps are designed to run in true Class A at lower volume levels and then they switch over to AB or B at higher ouput levels. But one should not confuse the two...
It's a matter of output stage quiescent current. Class B has the stage very near cutoff, and where the signal crosses ground, there may be a discontinuity. AB is biased on a little harder to minimize the discontinuity, and class A is just cranked on hard enough so that the output stage runs constant current, regardless of signal. It's just a matter of bias point setting what the lettered class is.
That's not one of those amps that vary the supply voltage rails to be just above signal demand to keep voltage overhead low, and as a result, power dissipation low too, is it?.
Not really sure what you are getting at here. I was simply making the distinction between things like "New Class A", which is actually just a very good Class AB amplifier and an actual Class A amplifier. Huge difference between them. Also I have zero problem with calling an amp "Class A" if it operates as such at lower levels. But now you are simply nitpicking about what to call something. That really isn't important. What is important is how those amps operate and the differences between them. Those companies like Technics, JVC and Fisher knew what they were doing when they used terms like that. They were trying to indirectly tie their products to something else. I love New Class A amplifiers but I am under no impression that they are "Class A" in any way, shape or form. That was simply a marketing tool from the manufacturer... And I am OK with that because the actual amp worked well and sounded good with very little distortion...Hmmm. By this logic, only a power amplifier which operates ONLY in Class A can be called a Class A amplifier. Not many of these around. What would you call an amplifier that operates in Class A 90% of the time? It is certainly not a Class A/B amp.
Not really sure what you are getting at here. I was simply making the distinction between things like "New Class A", which is actually just a very good Class AB amplifier and an actual Class A amplifier. Huge difference between them. Also I have zero problem with calling an amp "Class A" if it operates as such at lower levels. But now you are simply nitpicking about what to call something. That really isn't important. What is important is how those amps operate and the differences between them. Those companies like Technics, JVC and Fisher knew what they were doing when they used terms like that. They were trying to indirectly tie their products to something else. I love New Class A amplifiers but I am under no impression that they are "Class A" in any way, shape or form. That was simply a marketing tool from the manufacturer... And I am OK with that because the actual amp worked well and sounded good with very little distortion...
I will keep mine around for a long time and and they sure put out some heat.....all true Class A amps put out some heat, but the hottest of them all of my amps is actually not a Class A. The Yamaha B-1 runs hotter than any of my Class A amps:Not many of these around
It is certainly not a Class A/B amp.
I know I shouldn't go where angels fear to tread, but I feel compelled to assert that this is incorrect. Conduction for anywhere between 50% and 100% of the duty cycle is certainly class AB by definition. (Original engineering definition, that is, from somewhere around the middle of the last century. I don't accept that the definition has changed, despite all attempts by marketeers.)
This fool will rush back out now. No offense intended. Cheers.
Really?
How is an amp class A and then class A/B unless there is a switch between the two???
Marketing???
Class A/B amps are class A until they are operating in class B, hence class A/B.
https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/amplifier/class-ab-amplifier.html
".........the Class AB Amplifier is a combination of Classes A and B in that for small power outputs the amplifier operates as a class A amplifier but changes to a class B amplifier for larger current outputs. This action is achieved by pre-biasing the two transistors in the amplifiers output stage. Then each transistor will conduct between 180o and 360o of the time depending on the amount of current output and pre-biasing."
https://www.passlabs.com/technical_article/leaving-class-a/
"Class B, Class AB, or Class A.
Class B has no bias current, Class AB has a moderate bias current, and Class A has a high bias current. Class AB push-pull amplifiers are hybrids between Class B and Class A. Class AB run Class A at low power levels, and become Class B amplifiers at output currents determined by the bias."
In the case of the Yamaha amps, there is indeed a switch.

Disagreement is not offensive. The smarm is.
As i understand it, the amps I am referencing do indeed meet the definition for Class A...for some portion of their output.
Full current for 100% of the duty cycle for first 5, 10, 15, 20 etc watts, AB thereafter.