The very challenge is what you hear is a result of the gear found at either end of the cables as opposed to the cable itself. There are nearly an infinite number of combinations. Tests prove what they prove on the DUT(s). Extrapolating results globally and in to products not yet developed has no basis in science. Which is why reference to Russell's forty to fifty year old examples are an utter joke.Are there any double blind tests that conclusively show people picking boutique cables over basic cables?
The question really depends upon whether or not you have any interest in improving the transparency of your system so that you hear deeper into your favorite music. Do you want to be exposed to better?I have read about boutique wires not doing so well against even coat hangers...
If you don't, then folks typically focus on the minority of high priced junk that is bandied about with derision and sophomoric jokes. Lots of pigs with lipstick to be found. Is that your focal point with audio?
There is also another world. The cables I use and that of a reviewer friend have a lower EDC (faster propagation) and have reduced effects over the gear to which they are connected. If you know the values for L and C, that can be easily calculated. Using balanced connections also reduces the cable effects - which is why I use them in both music and garage systems.
Last edited:

