DangerBoy
Active Member
Case 1:
I have a set of 2 way speakers (PSB Image 2B) that I want to upgrade capacitors in. The 3rd order XOvers have a 1.5 uF, 8.0 uF and a 12 uF cap. They are all 10% tolerance caps.
It's easy to match the 1.5 and 12 uF with identical capacitance caps within my price range for this project. Not so much with the 8 uF. I can either go for an 8.2 uF or I could put two 4.0 uF caps in parallel for just a couple bucks more.
8.0 uF + or - 10% is 7.2 - 8.8 uF. An 8.2 uF 5% cap is 7.81 - 8.63 uF which falls well within the previous cap's range so I figure an 8.2 uF 5% or 1% cap should be just fine as a substitute for the 8.0 uF.
Is my reasoning sound here? Would the 8.2 uF 5% or 1% be okay or would I be better off getting two 4.0 uF 5% or 1% caps instead?
Case 2:
I have a subwoofer/Bass unit from an old (1970s) set of trio speakers that has a 120 - 128 uF cap wired in parallel with a 50 uF so total capacitance is 170 - 178 uF. I want to replace these caps with modern audio quality caps.
I can easily go with a 100 uF and a 75 uF but is it better to use two caps that are closer in capacitance rather than two that are further apart or does it not make much difference either way? Another option I have is an 82 and a 90 uF.
Cost-wise here are my options:
Dayton 100 uF 5% $32.49 or
Audyn 100 uF 5% $24.30
Dayton 75 uF 5% $22.62
OR
Audyn 82 uF 5% $19.99
Dayton 90 uF 5% $24.99
Cost-wise there's not much difference between the two options if I go for the Audyn 100 uF cap in the first option. Please note that all of these costs will be doubled because there are two woofers in this bass unit and each has its own crossover because the signal out of the bass unit goes to the two treble units/satellites.
I guess this question almost comes down to whether one has a strong preference for Dayton over Audyn. I've never tried either so I'd like to hear from anyone who has tried both.
Which way would you go on this and why?
I have a set of 2 way speakers (PSB Image 2B) that I want to upgrade capacitors in. The 3rd order XOvers have a 1.5 uF, 8.0 uF and a 12 uF cap. They are all 10% tolerance caps.
It's easy to match the 1.5 and 12 uF with identical capacitance caps within my price range for this project. Not so much with the 8 uF. I can either go for an 8.2 uF or I could put two 4.0 uF caps in parallel for just a couple bucks more.
8.0 uF + or - 10% is 7.2 - 8.8 uF. An 8.2 uF 5% cap is 7.81 - 8.63 uF which falls well within the previous cap's range so I figure an 8.2 uF 5% or 1% cap should be just fine as a substitute for the 8.0 uF.
Is my reasoning sound here? Would the 8.2 uF 5% or 1% be okay or would I be better off getting two 4.0 uF 5% or 1% caps instead?
Case 2:
I have a subwoofer/Bass unit from an old (1970s) set of trio speakers that has a 120 - 128 uF cap wired in parallel with a 50 uF so total capacitance is 170 - 178 uF. I want to replace these caps with modern audio quality caps.
I can easily go with a 100 uF and a 75 uF but is it better to use two caps that are closer in capacitance rather than two that are further apart or does it not make much difference either way? Another option I have is an 82 and a 90 uF.
Cost-wise here are my options:
Dayton 100 uF 5% $32.49 or
Audyn 100 uF 5% $24.30
Dayton 75 uF 5% $22.62
OR
Audyn 82 uF 5% $19.99
Dayton 90 uF 5% $24.99
Cost-wise there's not much difference between the two options if I go for the Audyn 100 uF cap in the first option. Please note that all of these costs will be doubled because there are two woofers in this bass unit and each has its own crossover because the signal out of the bass unit goes to the two treble units/satellites.
I guess this question almost comes down to whether one has a strong preference for Dayton over Audyn. I've never tried either so I'd like to hear from anyone who has tried both.
Which way would you go on this and why?