lightcapture
Super Member
I've had two 1019s and love the rhythmic and peppy sound they produce. I tire of them because I don't like the cramped deck with 10" platter, but on sound alone they are awesome.
That's a good way to put it Isotonic. I have two 1019's and a 1229 (as well as a 1009 in a mono system). I like the full sized platter and the strobe on the 1229 but I think I enjoy listening to the 1019 more. It would be a tough call if I were forced to choose between the two.
Bill at Fixmydual likes the 1019 best. I have never owned the 1219 but have owned the 1019. I sold it because I could never get over the record hanging over the platter. Just a personal thing....[/QUOTE
No I don’t. 1229 in a heartbeat.Bill at Fixmydual likes the 1019 best. I have never owned the 1219 but have owned the 1019. I sold it because I could never get over the record hanging over the platter. Just a personal thing....
How do you compare dual 1019 against Sony 2251+SME? I am curious about your experience since I have one Sony 2251+SME tonearm combo as well.I never understood the problem some have with the smaller platter on the 1019. The sound is great. How would a larger platter make it better? Or is it simply a matter of cosmetics? I personally think there is no table in the Dual line that sounds or looks better than the 1019, although I like the 1009 a lot too.
How do you compare dual 1019 against Sony 2251+SME? I am curious about your experience since I have one Sony 2251+SME tonearm combo as well.
Bill at Fixmydual likes the 1019 best. I have never owned the 1219 but have owned the 1019. I sold it because I could never get over the record hanging over the platter. Just a personal thing....
1219/1229 for sound quality, 1019 for looks, build & general awesomeness. The worst part about 1019 is probably the motor - at least on mine it takes a good 30 minutes to get up to speed and stabilize, which is a bummer on a full auto TT where you would expect it to be ready to go whenever. Other than that I like the 1019 motor better, it seems somehow just a bit more robust and maybe it's sample to sample variation but I never heard a 1219/1229 that was as silent in use. I had 3 of those and all of them seemed prone to a bit of whirring noise that I wasn't able to completely get rid of despite good clean and relube. The 1019 arm is probably better than you'd expect, but it is a bit colored and the biggest source for that special super exciting 1019 sound. 1219/1229 is more relaxed, natural and truer to recording.
All that said, I'd still take 1019 over 1219/1229 any day, simply because.
Have you tried refreshing the motor? Disassemble, clean, lube? That might help with the speed.
Yeah, no difference. It doesn't have a strobo or any way to see the speed in realtime, I wouldn't be surprised if they were all like that more or less, without people just noticing. It slowly creeps up to speed, if I recall correctly 1 album side is not quite enough, but by the end of side B it's up to speed and from there on it's stable. I couldn't see anything wrong with it and it's mechanically very silent. 12xx series have synchronous motors I think, at least 1219&1229, they are always locked to line freq. It's been a few years since I played around with the Duals. I still have the 1019 but it's not seeing any use, I like it but I like other TTs even better... I have replinthed it into a heavy plinth and made an armboard for it so I could use an external arm, it was my no1 player for a while, I just made sure to let it spin for 30 minutes if I was going to have a listening session. It was ok for that, but as a casual table I would want it up to speed right away.
Bill does not repair 1019s He said he throws them in the garbage Spoke with him todayBill at Fixmydual likes the 1019 best. I have never owned the 1219 but have owned the 1019. I sold it because I could never get over the record hanging over the platter. Just a personal thing....