Measure the Edcor with the end bells off. It looks like it will fit in the Heathkit can. The one coming out won't have end bells on it either. However.....
Unpotting is a stinking, smoky process as is repotting. If you are going to do it, buy a second Edcor and do both PTs at the same time.
I think that the Edcor may fit with the end bells off, however; I have already mounted and wired up the Edcor to the Heathkit chassis, so, at this point, I will not dismount it to remove the end bells to find out if it might fit. I really have no stomach for unpotting the Heathkit transformer.
Notes: Notable differences between the two transformers are:
1. No center tap for the 6.3V winding on the Edcor
2. 5A for the Edcor 6.3V secondary vs 4A for the Heathkit
3. 200mA for the Edcor HV secondary vs 130mA for the Heathkit
4. Different footprint. The Edcor will not drop into the mounting holes in the Heathkit chassis.
Heathkit 54-29
Primary: 117V, 60Hz.
HV secondary: 760V CT @ 130mA
6.3V Secondary: 6.3V CT @ 4A
5V Secondary: 5V @ 3A
Edcor XPWR033-120
Primary: 120V, 60Hz.
HV secondary: 760V CT @ 200mA
6.3V secondary: 6.3V @ 5A
5V secondary: 5V @ 3A
The Edcor delivers more voltage than the Heathkit because it is lightly loaded. B+ is between 510 - 520V for a 120V input. This makes the original quad cap unuseable as it is only rated for 450V. I have modified the power supply, using stacked 400V electrolytic capacitors, so that it is somewhat similar to the W5.
I am currently looking into changing the bias to keep the 5881 tubes within their design power rating. One option would be to substitute some 6L6GC for the 5881. The 6L6GC has a much higher power rating.
The 6.3V supply is also running high at 6.7V, so I will see about making an adjustment to get it closer to the 6.3V standard. The 5V supply seems to be pretty close to the correct value.