98%chimp
Member
I'll keep my eyes peeledYes, look for a pair of TF700's. Told you they were better!
I'll keep my eyes peeledYes, look for a pair of TF700's. Told you they were better!
Update: Got the TF600s (+ a sub). I'm very happy with them but not quite as blown away as I hoped. Which is to say: I still preffer the sound of my Polk Monitor 10bs, specially the clarity in the high frequencies. I suppose no amount of engeenering can get around the cheap tweeters on the Time Frames, but positioning helps a lot! Also the TF600s can really fill up the room! and sound pretty good wherever you are, whereas the Polks have a very definite sweet spot... so the 600s are perfect for my studio where I tend to move around quite a bit. @onwardjames you mentioned replacing the tweeters, right? I might have to look into that... you know of any pgrade?
I would suggest getting the TF-700 speakers entirely. I have 3 pairs now and I haven't heard ANY speakers under $1300 that can touch them.Well, I don't know an upgrade per se, but I'm sure Parts Express could help out (maybe?).
@dr*audio are you suggesting maybe scoring some TF700 tweeters? Or the whole speaker? I thought they pretty much used the same woofers all the way up the line, only changing the box size and tweeters (occasionally) ?
As always, thanks for your expertise.
I would suggest getting the TF-700 speakers entirely. I have 3 pairs now and I haven't heard ANY speakers under $1300 that can touch them.
Update: Got the TF600s (+ a sub). I'm very happy with them but not quite as blown away as I hoped. Which is to say: I still preffer the sound of my Polk Monitor 10bs, specially the clarity in the high frequencies. I suppose no amount of engeenering can get around the cheap tweeters on the Time Frames, but positioning helps a lot! Also the TF600s can really fill up the room! and sound pretty good wherever you are, whereas the Polks have a very definite sweet spot... so the 600s are perfect for my studio where I tend to move around quite a bit. @onwardjames you mentioned replacing the tweeters, right? I might have to look into that... you know of any pgrade?
Not only have I heard the TF-600's but I have repaired them as well. I was not impressed with the sound and they definitely seemed cheaply made compared to the TF-700's. The TF-600's don't have the uncolored sound of the TF-700's and they don't have the bass extension that the TF-700's, TF-1000's and TF-2000's have.Wow. So, if you have heard the TF-600's, what's your particular take on them?
Sorry, a bit belated of a reply.
I would suggest getting the TF-700 speakers entirely. I have 3 pairs now and I haven't heard ANY speakers under $1300 that can touch them.
I'm with you on theI've heard a few that I think can (if not surpass them). I'll preface my list by saying I'm a big fan of DCM (have owned cx-17, cx-27, tf-600, and TW3).
A few that I've owned that can be had at or below the $1300 mark that I feel are as good or better than the -700's...
JBL Studio 590
JBL L100t3
Electro Voice Interface C II
ADS 1290/II
Vandersteen 2 series (ci and ce)
Klipsch Forte II and Chorus II
DCM Time Window 3
Magnepan MMG (with a few subs .. can be done under $1300)
-700's aren't on the list of DCM speakers I've owned because the pair I auditioned didn't offer anything better than what I heard from TW3's...which I'd already moved on from.
I'm with you on the
ADS 1290/II ( A friend has these, very nice.)
Vandersteen 2 series (ci and ce) (this is one of the ones I was thinking of at $1300 new, when the TF-700's were $700.)
Disagree on the JBL L100t3. A harsh sounding speaker to my ears.
They just have a hard, glaring mid rangey sound to me. Some people really like them for Rock Music. I heard plenty of them because I had to repair them.I was using a Hafler 500 with mine (L100t3's). Maybe the MOSFET circuit tamed the highs a bit. With an Emotiva XPA-2 I didn't care for them as much...but it was more than just the highs that were disagreeable for me.
They just have a hard, glaring mid rangey sound to me. Some people really like them for Rock Music. I heard plenty of them because I had to repair them.
Disagree on the JBL L100t3. A harsh sounding speaker to my ears.
To be fair, the speakers were on the bench just a foot away from me, so maybe near field they sound worse. 104H sounds familiar, and I know I replaced midranges. This was at Fretter and our customers were a bunch of yabbos who abused their speakers.Hmm. I didn't think the mid range was over cooked in mine. As a matter of fact...and you probably already know this...they changed the crossover from the t to the t3 to improve its voicing . Also, the mid driver is the 104H, which was also used in the JBL L250Ti. I had L250's which use the LE5 mid range which I didn't care for, so I pulled them and put 104H's in them. They definitely weren't over cooked in the mids...perhaps a bit too laid back for me, actually.
Im tempted by some kappa8s that just surfaced but Im worried they might overpower my Sansui D11Wish I had seen this thread earlier, if all in the same condition then the Kappas win easily, I would want some good clean power to drive them. Not one of Infinitys notoriously hard to drive designs being 6ohm but I've found their better speakers respond to better power.
Also some Thiel CS 3.5s...Im tempted by some kappa8s that just surfaced but Im worried they might overpower my Sansui D11