Also, to answer your question about the $275 restoration expense being worth the investment...kind of a tough call. I think the resale value and desirability of a (vintage) speaker these days boils down to the type of history/lineage that follows it and what people generally have to say about it within the many internet audio discussion forums that exist and offer, often times, rather biased and half baked observations about its merits and/or flaws. Regardless, these opinions are often regarded as truth and can influence a speakers value, justified or not. A lot more KLH 23’s were sold than Infinity Q5 so there are a lot more people out there still listening to them. They’re a fine sounding speaker but, IMO, are absolutely not anything noteworthy in the context of performance that is available if one is willing to spend two or three times as much as what 23’s sell for...and that difference in performance is not slight. For instance, a clean pair of Vandersteen 2ci’s can be had for around $500 and, having lived with a pair for a few years, can say with confidence these speakers will handily outperform the 23’s in most every category. Now, that having been said, I would bet the Q5’s close the gap between the Vandees and 23’s, but is the $275 investment worth it? If you’ll be keeping the speakers for a good while and plan to enjoy them regularly then yes, probably so. But if you think you’ll want to upgrade from then soon then probably not as there simply isn’t enough good press out there for the Q5 (although the EMIT and Watkins are very highly regarded) to support high desirability in the marketplace and consequently high resale value...in spite of it being an excellent sounding speaker. Also, there are some electrolytic caps in the Q2’s that will almost certainly need to be replaced to realize their full potential.
Michael