Well, Mine Never Did...So, I ended up with an 6 Transistor in Leather...And, the White Ear Plug...Some of us old guys actually built crystal receivers way back then. Mine worked well enough to get me interested in radio and electronics. I was about 8. That was 1955.



For me, Audiogon seems to always be at the top end of the used price range (though usually you know it's well taken care of). Ebay is usually cheaper, than the cheapest is usually Craigslist.
That is a seriously good system. :thmbsp:


[/QUOTE]BTW: My first audio system was a crystal radio that I built as a kid in the mid-50's!
(Update: My radio worked very well as soon as I found a good place for the cat whisker)
![]()
__________________Oh, Lucky You...I didn't Know back then, that you needed at least 50' of Copper Antenna Wire W/Those Glass Insulators...I should have Read the Manual a little Better...
Wait a Minute Here...I was a Good Scout back then...But, I couldn't Make that Antenna Happen...And, That's what makes a Crystal Set Work...
These two words seem to clash here. What is your opinion is it possible to be a budget audiophile? I am talking eating ramen every night so you can afford that next piece of gear type budget. Minimum wage type budget. Poor college student type budget.
Money does infact have something to do with sound quality. A Rega P5 performs better than an entry level Rega. What money doesn't do, is exclude those with less of it from accessing hi-fi sound quality.
I hate to say it, but in a way we need those "audiophools" because they are the ones who help to keep the brick and mortar shops going. I have two boutique stores in my city and they are NOT funded by budget, deal seeking guys like us.
I appreciate the comments above, but would add that a person is not a fool simply because he buys new product from a local high end store. I was fortunate to work part-time in such a store for about six years starting in the late 1980's. Our customers almost always had budget parameters to work within, and they were definitely seeking the best deal they could get. For them, though, the "deal" wasn't seeing how cheaply they could buy something, it was using the local shops, and both in-store and in-home auditions, to help them ascertain just what kind of system and component choices would meet their particular sonic goals. The "good deal" was knowing that what they were buying would prove satisfying long term, that they wouldn't be wasting money by endlessly swapping gear, hoping to luck into a system that would satisfy them.
I also don't see a problem with denoting some items as "audiophile" while others are not. I consider "high fidelity" sound to be that which comes from components meeting the DIN 45 500 standards from the late 1960's, and that quality of sound can be had from many budget components, new or old. The term "audiophile" I would reserve for companies and components that go beyond just hi-fi. My 1970's BIC, Pioneer, EPI system was hi-fi, but not audiophile; my current Denon, Marantz, Bose system falls in the same category. "Audiophile" gear generally comes from companies like Naim, Roksan, conrad-johnson, Audio Research, Vandersteen, VPI, Ayre, Classe, Harbeth, Quad, etc., etc., not mass-market gear from big-box stores or flea markets.
I appreciate the comments above, but would add that a person is not a fool simply because he buys new product from a local high end store.