• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

IT'S HALLOWEEN AND TIME FOR A TT BUILD

Bottom plate is a heavy cast aluminum and the inner skin (shiny black) is a heavy composite of some sort

Careful with that composite, as it can be easy to crack at screw holes and such. Tighten just enough to do the job ... Had a couple "pre-cracked" when I got my Mitsu open for a rebuild, but was able to repair it with crazy glue ... lucky me, I had the chips that came out of it.

Last step of the build ... a crowning touch!

51Q4UjtXxwL._SY400_.jpg
 
Last edited:
WOW! Your the first that had something positive say about the arm. I could do that since the SME is not showing up till Monday now.

It's ugly, the lift handle feels cheap as can be as does the VTA ring. Resonance control when matched well is rather impressive. Not to say that's guaranteed to meets someone's audible expectation.
 
It's ugly, the lift handle feels cheap as can be as does the VTA ring. Resonance control when matched well is rather impressive. Not to say that's guaranteed to meets someone's audible expectation.
Ya that's properly why time step changes them all.
 
So what happened to the spare headshell holder? The casting appears to allow for it, but the top plate has covered it up?

missing headshell holder.jpg

sl1200 02.jpg

sl-1200G 01.jpg

Have they removed it from the G or was it only on the GAE? The GR doesn't appear to have it either.
 
You must be asking yourself why is he doing this. Like I said before is because I can. I have read a boatload of reviews and Forums on the new G. Some of the complaints where the feet and the tonearm. I can see the feet are cheap and don't look like they will dampen anything. Now the arm. I know nothing about the 1200 series turntables. Never owned one until now. But from what I have read is that the arm is in par with a 1200 MK IV. From what I understand not very good for $4,000 TT. Also some complained about a haze coming from the table do to the internal power supply. So I'm addressing these problems (If they do exist) before I even plug it in. Crazy? Ya you can say that. :dunno:
It's a good arm, but the best improvement you can make to an SL is to upgrade the arm.
Rabco-Technics.jpg Terminator and Temps.jpg
 
I agree. The way I look at it is what I'm doing won't hurt it. I'm using quality parts.
And you can always put the OE arm back, if that floats yer boat. One nice thing about the SLs, they're built so you can take them apart in a non-destructive way.
 
I read somewhere they put in on the prototypes then eliminated it on the final production of the tables.
Man why would they get rid of that? When I used my Technics - I always had a cart/headshell sitting in that to swap out with the current one at a moments notice - such a great feature. Sure you could keep it next to the table or somewhere else (where during cleaning it gets knocked off) - but why?

Have fun with your build.
 
The heart has been removed. I also removed the arm and hinges. Now you can see all the room that is left. Room for more dampening?IMG_0531.JPG
 
I wouldn't knock the feet, they are better than you think. They are actually filled with some silicone fluid which aids in damping. I've had no problems at all with it. I've also done some similar upgrades (other than the feet). I used the same Ammonite armboard but for a Jelco TK-850S, along with a Koetsu Urushi Sky Blue. I am also using the Auditorium 23 Hommage mat, which is a sort of rubberized felt of some sort. Also, you may want to look into the SME on the 1200G. I read someone on another forum had trouble fitting a DIN plug into the SME because of the angled connector. Here's a pic (sans A23 mat):

Hkcd8UL.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom