Comparison of the 3
Jubal's stayed on A.channel.
Test is mainly between Yamaha ns1000 monitors and 4312 monitors.
While the jbl is quite nice. Good bass, better than the 1000s strong mids and highs. They are keepers.
By themselves they do very well.
I have played them for 4 day now with my favorite music. They do everything great. Very solid and handle the power well also. Mostly 10 to 50 watts
Sometimes hitting 100. They blend perfectly with the jubals. The Jubal's l65 seem to be just a bit less sensitive, smoother and a little more refined. Less bass, just as good, even better than the 4312 for listening. Together they are a great combo.
4312 is a little sharper hits harder straight across the board.
The Yamaha's that were removed for the 4312s will be going back and replacing the 4312.
I like the ns1000s with the Jubal combination better.
The ability of the Yamaha's exceeds that of the jbl with the exception of the bass output of the 4312, they win there. But the continuity and seemless transition of the crossover, and the incredible mid and tweet in the Yamaha's added with the Jubal's make an incredible listening environment.
Even better might be the Yamaha with the 4312, but the Jubal's are to beautiful to pull off the floor.
Looks wise Yamaha, then Jubal, then 4312
Even though the Jubal's and 4312 are in near mint condition the 4312 are not the best looking of the bunch. The ns1000 wins in sound quality ,crossover, and build. Bass goes to 4312s and Jubal well they are great sounding all around. None will be sold for a long time.if I were to double on on pairs it would be Jubal's and ns1000s