• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

JBL L100A Jantzen Crossover project with photos.

Ridgeback

New Member
A while back I inquired here about doing either the "Murphy" crossover or the commercially sold "Jantzen" crossover "upgrade" for the L100. Several people in this forum including leesonic and especially Richard Swerdlow were kind enough to go out of their way to produce a diagram and a parts list complete with costs. The Jantzen folks also replied with their 4 kit options. It turned out that the cheapest (#4) Jantzen kit was the same price as the kit Richard put together but the Jantzen kit also included replacement damping material, Polyester Accoustilux, the crossover boards, and high-quality internal wire so I ended up going with the Jantzen designed by Troels Gravesen. Truth be told, I went with their next-best #3 kit with slightly better caps in the crucial midrange section. In the other thread litefootdan asked that I post notes and photos of the project so here goes nothin':

The box of parts came from Poland, I believe, via FEDEX in just 4 days! Well-packed and smart using the supplied baffle material and Accoustilux to act as the packing material.
IMG_5427.JPG

Step 1 on the crossover was to measure and mark the holes for the binding posts and the mounting holes and to mount the solder strips on the hardboards via the provided template.

JBL_L100A_JantzenXover_May2016-4155.JPG
My next step was to layout the components on the board before mounting them. I used clear 100% silicone adhesive. The thick consistency gives you good hold at first but with time to make minor adjustments before it starts to cure. Here is my completed board (component values have been blurred to protect Jantzen's intellectual property). Those big coils and caps are a thing of beauty. The crossover probably adds 5 lbs to the overall weight of each speaker. Incidentally, I spray-painted the back of the crossover board black where it would show through on the back side where the binding posts stick out.
JBL_L100A_JantzenXover_May2016-4164.JPG

At this point I began to remove the drivers and make note of the wiring. I opted to keep the original crossover intact should I ever opt to return it to stock. Next, I removed the old damping material. Note the small bit inside the midrange driver enclosure.
JBL_L100A_JantzenXover_May2016-4157.JPG

JBL_L100A_JantzenXover_May2016-4160.JPG
After bundling the stock crossover wires, I cut away the spades that go to the tweeter in order to re-use on the new crossover as seen above.

Next I removed the old binding post board and pulled away any remaining staples and chipped away any old adhesive.
JBL_L100A_JantzenXover_May2016-4162.JPG

After vacuuming the cab out thoroughly, I determined the ideal location for mounting the crossover and drilled pilot holes for the mounting screws. BE CAREFUL YOU DON'T DRILL ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE BACK OF THE CAB!!

Then I began cutting and installing the baffle material. Don't forget to but a little baffle material in the midrange pocket. Next I cut away the baffle material where the crossover mounts to the back of the cab and I glued and screwed it down as seen below.
JBL_L100A_JantzenXover_May2016-4171.JPG

Then I soldered the spades to the tweeter portion of the wires and used shrink wrap tubing to seal the splices.
JBL_L100A_JantzenXover_May2016-4176.JPG

Finally, I zip-tied the wires for a neater setup and installed the Accoustilux over the crossover and reinstalled the drivers.
JBL_L100A_JantzenXover_May2016-4177.JPG

Overall, the kit took me the better part of a weekend to complete but the instructions were well-written and Troels Gravensen was quick to respond via email to a couple of questions I had including one on polarity which I will address next.

As many of you already know, JBL was unique in the way they assigned Red/Black with regards to polarity on speaker terminals, often outside of what I understand are current "industry standards" (where Red is positive and Black is negative). With JBL, sometimes Red was positive and sometimes Black was positive--(especially with the LE5-2). And in my case, one LE5-2s driver had "correct" polarity and the other was inverted!! Weird! Anyway, with either Troels' design or the Murphy design, you must determine and mark which pole is positive or negative despite JBL's assignments. There is a technique where you use a 1.5v battery to determine which is which terminal is which.

Besides differences in crossover components, Troels' design and Murphy's design differ in the way they wire the crossover to the drivers with regard to polarity. The Murphy crossover has all the positive leads going to the (+) terminals on the drives. Troels' design has only the woofer wired in normal polarity while the midrange and tweeter are wired with inverted polarity! I'm curious to hear what you guys think of that strategy and the effect it would have on the sound.

On to the way they sound now as compared to stock. Forgive me as I'm not great at articulating these things but it's an alarming difference. The speakers no longer have that in-your-face presence, that so-called West Coast Boom-tizz. They are now way more balanced and listenable IMO. No more ear fatigue. They do seem like they require a bit more power to achieve similar volumes but to me that's a fair trade-off. I much prefer the new sound.
 

Attachments

  • JBL_L100A_JantzenXover_May2016-4157.JPG
    JBL_L100A_JantzenXover_May2016-4157.JPG
    74.9 KB · Views: 54
Register to hide this ad
Good work on the upgrades.
Yes, JBL did change the phase of the woofers and the rest of the drivers on some speaker systems.
I almost want to send you a couple of boxes of insulated connectors so that you don't have to salvage old connectors. The shipping would be more than the cost, however.
With the new crossover you may have eliminated the West Coast "bump" that is infamous with JBL and some other speakers. That can sometimes change the whole presentation to the ear. Also, since you now have the enclosure stuffed fully, that may explain the loss of volume. You could try eliminating some of the stuffing to see if that recovers towards the sound level you experienced pre-restoration.
 
Ridgeback – Thanks for the photos. It looks like you did a great job. I'm glad the directions worked well for you.

In the Dennis Murphy design, the crossover filter slopes are Linkwitz-Riley 4th order. That requires that all three drivers be wired in phase with each other. Obviously, the Gravesen design is different, hence the different wiring phase for the woofer vs. the midrange and tweeter. There is no advantage or disadvantage to that, the wiring of the different drivers depends on how their phase is altered by the crossover filters.

Neither crossover design has any effect on the elevated bass bump around 70-80 Hz. That is the result of using the 123A woofer in a small ported cabinet. Changing the cabinet lining can have only a small effect on that. To really level that out, a much larger closed cabinet is required. I think that is described in detail somewhere on Gravesen's web pages.

The somewhat lower loudness of the new design crossover is the result of the added resistance (sometimes called "insertion loss") of the copper wire in all those inducter coils. The original JBL crossover had no coils at all. And yes, the smoother frequency response is well worth it.
 
Strong work, and thanks for the nice write-up! It's interesting how, after seeing the Jantzen kit on the market for so many years, this is the first time I can recall reading about someone actually building one. I suspect part of the reason is the L100s have become so valuable, the kit cost seems more reasonable now.

I would imagine that the speakers are quieter (less efficient) now because the woofer output is the limiting factor in speaker sensitivity, and you've gone from running the woofers directly off the amp, to adding a fair amount of circuitry to the woofer path. (Edit: RS beat me to it.)
 
I noticed this difference in polarity when I acquired a pair of L100A with one original 123A-1 and one replaced 123A-3 woofer. I knew something was wrong as soon as I heard them playing, and thanks to the internet was able to fix that in no time. I wonder if reversing the polarity of the LE5 is an attempt to tame the midrange.

Thanks for posting, I go back and forth on modifying the primitive 2-cap crossovers on mine. I do prefer the forward voicing in the mids on these monitor type speakers. nothing beats them for capturing vocal timbre and guitar tone (I am a guitar player), these things I pick apart in a piece of music when I listen. I am wondering if I would miss that if crossover mods were done. I guess I need to find another pair of L100A to try with, I do regret letting them go!
 
I noticed this difference in polarity when I acquired a pair of L100A with one original 123A-1 and one replaced 123A-3 woofer. I knew something was wrong as soon as I heard them playing, and thanks to the internet was able to fix that in no time. I wonder if reversing the polarity of the LE5 is an attempt to tame the midrange.
JBL apparently switched how it marked the polarity of drivers at different times. That's why its so important to do the battery test and find out for certain.
I go back and forth on modifying the primitive 2-cap crossovers on mine. I do prefer the forward voicing in the mids on these monitor type speakers. nothing beats them for capturing vocal timbre and guitar tone (I am a guitar player), these things I pick apart in a piece of music when I listen. I am wondering if I would miss that if crossover mods were done. I guess I need to find another pair of L100A to try with, I do regret letting them go!
Read this DIY build thread and see how uneven that LE5-2 mid range driver was. The original crossover let it run way too high, which introduced most of the high frequency trouble.

https://forums.audioholics.com/forums/threads/the-vintage-jbl-west-coast-sound-becomes-the….25014/
 
If you don't mind saying, how much was the crossover upgrade?

My brother is storing a pair of 4311B for me and I always wanted to try the crossover upgrade.
 
Ridgeback,

Fantastic documentation. Thanks so much for posting your project. And your work looks top notch too!!! Could you estimate how much less efficient the L100's seem now? I'm using a pair of L36's (that I have not yet done the Janzen upgrade to) in a bedroom setup, and only feeding them 3-4 watts or so. The amp, speaker combo is so nice I don't really want to split them apart....

At any rate, your speakers look great. Thanks for the post.
 
donprice, here you go:

Level 1: 400.00 € (approx. 457.00 US$) Level 1 and level 2 kits were made to customer demand, for those who wish to have the very best components for all components positions
Level 2: 301.00 € (approx. 344.00 US$)
Level 3: 235.00 € (approx. 269.00 US$) Superior Z-Caps for the tweeter section for the crossovers, where the hearable upgrade in sound is the most profound
Level 4: 160.00 € (approx. 183.00 US$) All cross caps, so here you will get a soft and smooth sound, but the tweeter will lack some of the transparency and detail that a super cap offers

I did Level 3 in bold at the recommendation of the folks at Jantzen. The descriptions are via the folks at Jantzen.
 
Last edited:
litefootdan, it's hard to say but I'd estimate 5-10%. So for example, if I had been listening with the volume knob on "4" out of 10 before, now I need to go to 4.5 or 5. I'm using a Rogue Audio Sphinx amp by the way.
 
Could you estimate how much less efficient the L100's seem now?
FWIW, with the Dennis Murphy crossover, the speakers became a bit less sensitive, by less than 3 dB. I estimated this by eyeball, at 500 Hz and 1000 Hz, from the before and after frequency response curves.

As a guess, I think the Gravesen crossovers will do about the same.

@Ridgeback – Your modified L100s now have no adjustable L-pads for the midrange and tweeter. Would you please comment about that? L100 owners are always curious about that.

With mine, I never missed them as the speakers sounded properly balanced, and those variable L-pads were so badly oxidized that they made a lot of noise if I moved them.
 
Agreed with Richard. My pads were super noisy and temperamental. I dared not move my pads much as the sound would (in some spots) simply drop out. I read about some people removing the metal plate (ruining it and the unique serial number in the process) in order to replace or clean the pads, only to have them reoxidize some time down the road. The crossover upgrade seemed like a longer-term solution.

Whether or not I'll miss the pads, I'd say no. I forgot to mention that as a part of Troels' design, you can "opt" between 2 resistors in the tweeter section to add a bit more high end. Also as an option, you can bypass the resistor first in line in the midrange section to do the same. I opted to go with the higher-end resistor in the high end. Down the road I might experiment with bypassing that midrange resistor to see how it would modify the sound.

Richard, did you ever experiment with plugging the port following the crossover upgrade? Perhaps it's not necessary any more?
 
Richard, did you ever experiment with plugging the port following the crossover upgrade? Perhaps it's not necessary any more?
Yes, I plugged the ports and in my opinion the sound improved a bit. With the new flat crossover, I thought the 70-80 Hz bass hump was more noticeable. Plugging the ports helps some but doesn't completely fix the problem.

I bought two 3" diameter plumber's test plugs at Home Depot. With a little filing, they fit the ports. Have fun with gullible audiophiles – twist the wingnut a bit and ask if they hear the difference :rolleyes:.
maLZpXFZ2hEtlA1fp26alTw.jpg
 
I was able to reach inside the hole in the baffle for the woofer, pull the metal caps off the back of the pots and spray them down with deoxit. those caps pull off and push on easily.. or at least they do on a 4310.
 
I was able to reach inside the hole in the baffle for the woofer, pull the metal caps off the back of the pots and spray them down with deoxit. those caps pull off and push on easily.. or at least they do on a 4310.
Deoxit can temporarily fix the problem, but it never goes away. If you replace them with new L-pads, they still oxidize and get noisy. Ridgeback is right, a whole new crossover with the right bass/treble balance is the long term fix.
 
Hi! all, I am torn between Troel's and Murphy's upgraded crossover design for JBL L100. Anybody had experienced listening to both design? Any "big deal" difference?
 
Yes, I plugged the ports and in my opinion the sound improved a bit. With the new flat crossover, I thought the 70-80 Hz bass hump was more noticeable. Plugging the ports helps some but doesn't completely fix the problem.

I bought two 3" diameter plumber's test plugs at Home Depot. With a little filing, they fit the ports. Have fun with gullible audiophiles – twist the wingnut a bit and ask if they hear the difference :rolleyes:.
maLZpXFZ2hEtlA1fp26alTw.jpg

For the best sound, hand-tighten them first, then with a torque wrench, apply between 2 and 200 inch-lbs. to your liking...
 
Another option would be to use to S70 Alpha 3 crossover by JBL but delete the LE-5 and replace it with a 104h2/3 midrange. I would still plug the port or you could pull the port tube out entirely and try a sort of aperiodic tuning with a small amount of leaky foam covering the inside of the port hole. Simply Speakers makes a LE-5 replacement driver but no measurements are provided...if it measures more like a 104h driver i.e.: it does not have the bad peak noted by Troels on the LE-5...then it could be used as the midrange driver. None the less I would ditch the tweeter and use either a modern dome or better yet a Fountek ribbon as a tweeter.
 
Back
Top Bottom