These go up to "11."Guys I like big horns too but the more logical side of me sees them as more sound reinforcement speakers and not home us. Those things are huge. Does everyone really believe there is a lot of difference in sound compared to the K-horn in a average size home listening room? Enough to spend $40K for. Great for showing off though. Just trying to be sensible which audiophiles often are not.
Yeah, they are Khorns on steroids. Often described at listening to the largest badazz headphones in a normal listening room. BUT, my friend has a new rather large listening room under construction. Either way, he is happy with them for many reasons.Guys I like big horns too but the more logical side of me sees them as more sound reinforcement speakers and not home us. Those things are huge. Does everyone really believe there is a lot of difference in sound compared to the K-horn in a average size home listening room? Enough to spend $40K for. Great for showing off though. Just trying to be sensible which audiophiles often are not.
broadly speaking, "a bigger horn is a better horn." the Jubilee has lower horn loading on the bass section, as well as lower frequency response, while up top, the big horn provides time and phase aligned midrange and treble and with dsp, the bass bin can be similarly aligned. the difference is not subtle, especially compared to the K400 horn, which is one of the worst horns with the longest production line in history.Guys I like big horns too but the more logical side of me sees them as more sound reinforcement speakers and not home us. Those things are huge. Does everyone really believe there is a lot of difference in sound compared to the K-horn in a average size home listening room? Enough to spend $40K for. Great for showing off though. Just trying to be sensible which audiophiles often are not.
I'm in agreement with you. Had KHorns for 30+ years then got a UG Jubes 9 years ago. The bass from the Jube is just better. And placement is not so finicky. And the K402 compared to the K400...well there is no comparison.I've got underground Jubs. I had Khorns years ago. The bass of an underground Jub bin does not sound like a Khorn at all to me. Khorn bass is more "tubby" and excuse me for saying slightly bloated. Still excellent of course, but those words are just meant to capture that it is not a tight and snappy bass sound for sure (but it could be made to be). An underground Jub bin is much more like a lascala on steroids. It has commonality with the lascala sound in that the Jub bin is much more tight and snappy......unlike the Khorn sound. Just my two cents, YMMV.
I hope you did not pay $40K for those underground Jubs.
You'd have to listen with the windows open!I thought Jubes were 2-way. Badass, would sound great in my 14x14' room I'm sure!
Klipsch Pro Theater models were available 2 & 3 way. 3 way handled larger theaters better.I thought Jubes were 2-way. Badass, would sound great in my 14x14' room I'm sure!
I very briefly listened to pair of underground Jubilees years ago. There is something to be said for the K402.In general the bigger the horn the better the sound.
I’ve spent a few hours with both the Underground and current model Jubilees. (I own Klipschorns that I have modified.)Guys I like big horns too but the more logical side of me sees them as more sound reinforcement speakers and not home us. Those things are huge. Does everyone really believe there is a lot of difference in sound compared to the K-horn in an average size home listening room? Enough to spend $40K for. Great for showing off though. Just trying to be sensible which audiophiles often are not.
the Heritage Jube? Somewhat larger I believe. The old UG Jube yes not much difference.In terms of size, their footprint is not that much bigger than that of the Klipschorn.