• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Logitech UE-4000 On-Ear Headphone review

Register to hide this ad
I'm patiently waiting for the video. :)

Gonna do the video tonight. BTW, after finding both Logitechs at Apple and both were good performers (and the 6000 had much better bass), I'm a big fan of Logitech today. I read somewhere there's a 9000 that might be even better.
 
The 6000 sound impressed me the most by far, a much fuller sound with good bass support etc. I went for the cheaper one on budget, but will probably get the 6000 later, unless I decide on the 9000 if that's a better bet.
 
It's here! Whoa! Next day air.

8051960560_de903d7487_c.jpg
 
I'm curious what you'll think about it compared to newer $200 headphones like the Soundmagic HP100. I'm hoping it's a little warmer and less bright.
 
It's here! Whoa! Next day air.

Comparing the 6000 to the Sennheiser Amperior and Shure 1840 tonight, the bass of the 6000 is much heavier than the Amperior which is already slightly excessive around 100 hz, so I set bass reduction for the 6000 to continue the comparison. With bass reducer the 6000 now is very similar to the Amperior, and much stronger than the flat bass of the Shure 1840.

So, running tone sweeps on the bass-reduced 6000 compared to the Amperior which is not EQ'd (played flat), the response from 30 hz up through about 5 khz is comparable, and the Amperior takes a dip around 6 khz while the 6000 rises slightly there. Above 6 khz they're comparable again.

That 6 khz difference, in what I call the "presence" region is significant, because the Amperior treble sounds fairly soft to me compared to the Shure 1840. The 6000 treble sounds pretty similar to the 1840 treble, so here's my overall analysis of the 6000's signature at this point:

The bass-reduced 6000 has the best of the Amperior on the low end and the best of the 1840 on the high end, and does not have the worst of either of those two headphones. So the 6000 is a double winner. Actually, a triple winner since you can get the near-ideal hi-fi sound with bass reduction, or turn the EQ off and enjoy a stronger bass if that's your preference. Although the non-EQ'd stronger bass is not my preference and seems to reduce the effectiveness of the lower midrange, there doesn't seem to be any muddying or boominess with that default bass, so I think triple winner is appropriate.

This is not only a very good signature for $200, you also get active noise canceling (BTW, these tests were with noise canceling on).
 
I think I see a trend forming. Seems designers are beginning to add unnecessary acute angles into the appearance of their headphones. I can't say I'm a fan of that.

Otherwise it seems like a little headphone that's worth a try.

Also am only now making the connection between Ultimate Ears and Logitech. The Creative Aurvana Live! is a rebranded Denon. I have an issue perceiving brands like Logitech and Creative as computer accessory companies, not headphones companies. I guess this is a perception that I'm going to have to shake.
 
I think I see a trend forming. Seems designers are beginning to add unnecessary acute angles into the appearance of their headphones. I can't say I'm a fan of that. Otherwise it seems like a little headphone that's worth a try. Also am only now making the connection between Ultimate Ears and Logitech. The Creative Aurvana Live! is a rebranded Denon. I have an issue perceiving brands like Logitech and Creative as computer accessory companies, not headphones companies. I guess this is a perception that I'm going to have to shake.

I think you're right on with that. Lots of deals are being made between these companies, and smart shoppers could save themselves some money not buying the same thing twice because it has a different brand name.
 
From what I hear, Innerfidelity got 2 sets of the UE-4000 (from where I don't know), and had problems on the left side with both sets. Reduced bass, increased distortion. So I tested mine with deep bass and mono tracks, and listened to each earcup with the left ear (to eliminate any left-right hearing difference). The UE-4000 design allows each earcup to be placed evenly on the left ear, so differences there won't be a factor. My left and right drivers were within one decibel of each other. I don't remember buying any headphones in the past 2 years (about 30 sets total) that had significant differences between the left and right, although there was one brand and model of headphone, very low-priced, that had significant sample-to-sample differences.
 
The UE6000 is very good. I am trying to secure the UE9000.

Dale, you should upgrade to the UE6000. You may like.
 
The UE6000 is very good. I am trying to secure the UE9000. Dale, you should upgrade to the UE6000. You may like.

The 6000 stands up well to the Amperior in bass and mids, and compares well to the Shure 1840 in highs. Gonna compare to the SM HP100 tonight.

The 9000, at $400 just for Bluetooth, is way overpriced.
 
If the UE9000 sounds good wireless, then it may be worth trying. Considering the Sennheiser MM550x is $499.

Based purely on the spectacular sounding UE-6000, I'd say the 9000 is definitely overpriced no matter how good it is. But, if you must have wireless, then it may be the best bet.
 
The best wireless "headphones" I have ever listened to is the Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D Omega Wireless Gaming Headset. Fantastic sound the boom mic' unplugs so you can set it a side if you don't need it. Plus it is built like a tank, I suppose to stand up to angry gamers having equipment throwing temper tantrums ;) I am presently listening to my wired Creative Sound Blaster Tactic360 Sigma Gaming Headset it has the same 50mm Neodymium magnet drivers as the Omega Wireless, The Omega besides being wireless has a different digital processing package, other wise the spec's are the same. These headsets can reproduce the sound of an atomic bomb going off, dynamically there is nothing these Sound Blasters cannot handle. I have yet to find music these headsets cannot do a fantastic job with, Classical, New Age , Euro Trance, Orchestral Metal, Battle Metal, classic be-bop, rockabilly, Rock-n-Roll, Jazz, Dixie Land, etc. I tried out the wireless ones and liked the sound but at the time could not afford the purchase price so I have Tactic360 Sigma's instead which as I said above the same drivers as the wireless version. They are much cheaper then some as has been mentioned above.

http://us.store.creative.com/Creative-Sound-Blaster-Recon3D-Omega-Wireless/M/B005KAK2FI.htm

5161Wy36RwL._SL250_.jpg
 
Last edited:
Dale, Is the UE4000 worth owning if I already own the UE6000 & UE9000?

I sure think so. It's a different fit being on-ear, but easily the most comfy on-ear I ever used. And it's a nice warm, smooth sound. I don't find anything to dislike about it. But, be aware there have been some bad samples, so be prepared to exchange. The UE4000 is my favorite portable.
 
Back
Top Bottom