• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Looking for: Vintage Reciever with a Designated Subwoofer Output

guitar_freak

Active Member
about a decade ago I had this vintage reciever with a subwoofer output (late 70s-early 80s). Upon doing much research at the time, I had concluded there where only two recievers that had the ever vintage look with subwoofer outputs. I can’t remember the make of this reciever, let alone the model.


Could anyone give me a hand with this? I believe it may have been Fisher or Realistic, although I’m not sure.
 
Register to hide this ad
Any old receiver with a center channel will work. The center channel was meant to use with an external amp. You would need to use a powered sub, or an amplifier with the proper x-over for subs tho....
 
I have several receiver from the 64 to 74 that have a center mono speaker channel out. So left, right and center. Is that what you are asking about?
 
I have several receiver from the 64 to 74 that have a center mono speaker channel out. So left, right and center. Is that what you are asking about?

I’m looking for a vintage reciever that has a designated subwoofercrossover output along with the speaker outputs, entitled “sub”.
 
Sony 6065. Don't know the details, but I think it does cut lower frequencies to the stereo speakers when used. I have not tried using it on mine.
 
Didn't exist. People then who wanted lower bass usually bought larger speakers. Electronic Crossovers were rare in that era, even separate component items. Subwoofers and satellite systems didn't catch on until the 1980's.

When speakers were speakers, and their low-frequency response was BETTER than many of today's dedicated "subs" there was more than enough air moving at 18 Hz. Now that we've forgotten how to go to the moon and back, and apparently forgotten how to make anything larger than an 8" cone, there seems to be a void in the low frequencies. It seems to be another case of "new" ≠ "better."

I know that's a bit of an over-generalizaton, but the point is that a TRUE full-range speaker will get it done.
 
Back
Top Bottom