• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

MC2105 restore to former glory / parts list

Refugee

Hurricane Refugee
Subscriber
MC2105 restore to former glory / parts list

I finally decided to restore my beloved MC2105. I am a hobbyist, not an engineer so my thoughts on circuit theory are to be taken with a grain of salt. That being said: I do have some insights that may help people that don’t do this work every day.

Please!! If anyone on the forum sees any mistakes in my parts list or logic, comment and help us all learn.

My 2105 has a later serial number S# 88M11. McIntosh said it came off the line between 1971 and 1972.

I want to start with some mistakes I made:

1. I recapped the whole amp before plugging it back in and testing. It would have been better to benchmark the performance of the amp and then recap section by section and test between each step to see what improvement followed. Probably best to start with the power supply. Then the input section, output section, and finally the meter section. The amp did work great when I was finished but it would have been easier to track down a mistake if I would have tested between each section and it would have pointed out what changes yielded the most benefits.

2. I bought a kit. I hoped this would have saved me the time researching and acquiring parts, but it did not! I ended up doing the research anyway. I bought some parts that I thought would be better in some cases. Also, the parts are available and cheaper if you get them yourself. You learn more and are better prepared to install them if you pick them out yourself. Some resources are Digi-key, Mouser, Hayseed Hamfest, TTI, and Parts-express.

3. I did not put another component in my main system during the refurb. I believe my stress level would have been lower if I had put another amp in my system during the time my amp was on the bench. Music always helps! This made me want to hurry which is never a good idea. Plan on the restoration taking as much time as necessary, you may have to wait for parts or for windows of time that you are feeling focused and not distracted by other things going on in your life.

Tools: I have a soldering setup, a Digital Multimeter, an Oscilloscope, a signal generator, dummy load, small brushes and tools, and a pair of 3.5x magnification glasses from the drug store. I would like to get a THD analyzer next. A Refurbish can be done with less… and can be done better with more. Budget-budget-budget…

Doing your homework before ordering parts:

Get the paperwork. You need to find all the paperwork you can about your unit. Make sure the service manuals and schematics you get are correct for your serial number as many of the units had changes made during their production life and early units can be different from later units. HiFi engine is a great site for finding paperwork. Also, check to see if there are any service bulletins or later updates recommended by the manufacturer. I printed several copies of the schematics and board layouts so I could take notes.

Cleaning: Cleaning the unit is the best way to get to know it. Start with cleaning. Clean as you go. Clean when you are finished. Small brushes, isopropyl alcohol, Q-tips, make-up pads, electronic spray cleaners, chrome polish, wax – whatever helps you to detail the unit. You will know your way around the unit when you are done. This is also a good time to check your schematic against the actual unit.

Clean out all the controls (pots and switches). Use the right chemicals on these. I like Caig DeoxIt F5 Fader lube for most pots.

Plug it back in and test after the first clean. You may be satisfied and stop there – It makes a big difference!

Measure all the parts you want to replace. Take the amp apart and physically find all the parts you want to replace. Don’t just go by the service bulletin’s list. At the very least all electrolytic caps should be replaced. I got a small metal ruler marked in mm and measured all the parts I planned on replacing. You cannot get all the exact sizes but if you have all the sizes written on your parts list then when you start shopping online for the parts you will make better decisions. This also helps familiarize you with the locations of the parts and what they do in the circuit which is important to know for shopping also. There may be some parts that are not what the service manual says they are. Make a note of this when measuring the parts. If your unit has been working and has parts that seem original but do not match the service manual, you should in most cases replace with parts of the actual value. Changes were made during production and not all changes were documented.

Organize your list. Digi-key, Mouser and the others have a list feature on their websites. Build your list online and then check it again with the service manual before purchasing. It is a real bummer to have to order one part you missed later and wait another week for it to come in and pay more shipping. Use the comment section in the online list feature to list what board or part of the circuit the components go to. Print the list and check it twice with the unit in front of you!

Pick your parts carefully. There are many things to consider when picking parts. They should be quality, they should fit well, they should look as period as possible without sacrificing performance. You can read for weeks on capacitor choices alone and barely scratch the surface so I will speak in general terms on the subject.

Capacitors: In my opinion you should try to preserve the character of a classic unit. Using caps with a higher voltage rating is a good idea and will help you match the size of the original components but don’t go overboard. I think double the voltage rating is as far as you should go unless availability dictates more. These units do see a higher mains voltage these days and the caps will last longer with a higher voltage rating. Keep the capacitance the same to the best that is available. Upgrading parts can improve the unit but perhaps it is better to get the unit up to speck before upgrading caps to “boutique types”. If the unit had Mylar caps use the best mylar caps you can find. If there is a bi-polar electrolytic in the signal path replace it with the same. It is tempting to make “improvements” while you are inside the unit but don’t change component types until you get to benchmark the amp after a basic restore. Some may disagree but if it is your gear then you have time to open it up again later. It’s part of the fun anyway.

Resistors: In my amp there were mostly ½ Watt carbon comp resistors. I checked them all. Any that were marked as 5% on the schematic or out of tolerance got replaced. I used ½ Watt carbon film. I chose this type for a few reasons. Carbon film are physically larger than the metal film resistors so I did not have to go up in Wattage to achieve a classic look. They typically can handle higher voltages than metal film and are closer to the older design speck. They will not change the overall sound character or aesthetic look of the amp. Carbon film are an upgrade from the carbon comp resistors, and will be tighter tolerance, last longer, and are quieter. A very conservative upgrade that I thought would be ok for round one.

**I also wanted to have some continuity in the type of resistors, so I found a ‘series’ of resistors from the same manufacturer that had most of the values that I needed when shopping online. This made the bulk of my replacements the same size and look and value marking scheme.

I would have needed 2W Metal film to match the size of most of the original resistors. Although going up in wattage is generally considered fine to do, I believe that going up too much will take a problem that might just burn a resistor and turn it into a problem that will burn more parts.

I used 5% or better for all the resistors I changed. Some 5% resistors I went to 1% based on where they were in the circuit.

Some higher W resistors in the unit were replaced also and I matched them the best I could with all these factors in mind.

If they were wire wound resistors I did not ‘upgrade’ to non-inductive types as the inductance could be part of the circuit design (on purpose or accidentally). I have read that non-inductive wire wound resistors in the MC2105 could cause oscillation in the output section.

Thermistors: My amp’s thermistors were totally worn out and I replaced them. I suggest replacing them if your unit uses them as a soft start like the MC2105. My amp would dim the lights in the house when I turned it on! This cured the problem.

Transistors: The transistors in my 2105 were all working well. I will probably go back in and test the input board for distortion and revisit the transistors on that board. I may change them, and I may not. I need to tool up a little more to be able to properly test the amp for THD and match transistors so that will have to wait.

Diodes: I did not change any diodes in my amp but may revisit this in the future. I did order D103,104 from McIntosh in case I do the update to the output board.

General: All this is to say that when I choose parts for a refurb, the factors I care about are as follows:

Type and value, Quality, Fit, Aesthetic vintage look, Availability.

**All parts replaced in one channel (right or left) are matched on the other channel.

**Check any Voltages that you can after the work is done – Test your THD if you have the capability – calibrate the meters – replace the lamps.

Upgrades/Mods: I decided to leave all modifications and upgrades for later (if ever). After I have returned the unit to ‘like new’ status and have benchmarked what that looks like (sounds like), I can better decide if I want to go further.

There is a bulletin from McIntosh on this unit to upgrade the output boards. I got all the parts to do the upgrade but decided to leave this for later. Once again, I want to benchmark before I upgrade (or update in this case).

In the end I replaced all the electrolytic capacitors, left the mica capacitors alone, and changed all resistors that were out of tolerance and a few that I thought were in places in the circuit that were important like the bias resistors for some of the transistors. I also calibrated the meters and changed all the lamps with original type incandescent lamps. The strips of foam around the meters behind the glass I replaced with thick felt cut into strips as I did not want to use foam that will deteriorate. The parts I did not use went into a box with all the paperwork and notes for the next time I work on the amp.

The amp is working great and sounds better than it has in years!! I can’t believe the difference. All the clichés are true – tighter bass, better sound stage, high end detail, vocal warmth and clarity, more musical… ….

Please see the parts list I attached to the post. I hope the list helps. Enjoy your projects.
image0 (1).jpeg image1 (1).jpeg image3 (1).jpeg image4 (1).jpeg image5 (1).jpeg image7 (2).jpeg
 

Attachments

Register to hide this ad
Thanks for the info! I have a stock 2105 from 1972 that is in the que for an overhaul. Nice work!
 
Very nice work @Refugee

I agree with most of what you did/posted, a few comments:

Increasing the capacitors' voltage by a factor of two because line voltage has gone up? Not really, from a nominal 117VAC when it was built and a large potenial swing, to today's maybe 120VAC with typically smaller swings, I am confident it was already good for a constant 125VAC plus some safety factor, before good computer modeling we had to leave a huge safety margin in engineering.

You didn't change capacitor types, nor values, I applaud your logic. You did however change resistor type, not sure I agree with that one, it can have some affect on sound if in a signal path, also the temperature coefficient will be different, which might have been part of the original design. Just a comment, most (or all) of us wouldn't be able to tell a difference if there is one, but a runaway is a runaway, ... my experience was that we did a lot of testing before we found all of the places we were "tickling the dragon's tail". And the justification that it will last longer than the originals, ... that lasted 50 years? I think the original design was pretty good but your grandchildren might appreciate your attention to detail.

On that same subject, please do rebuild the driver boards and do the SB. There is a failure that can take them out, I've seen it happen, it isn't pretty and that is why the SB exists. You've done a lot of work to see it go up in smoke.

In all, I have to say it looks like you put a lot of the correct time and thought into this project, well done.

Oh, last comment: There are a lot of manuals here in Digital Docs, I don't think people know they're there becase so many people go instead to hifiengine. I know I've submitted several here, but none to hifiengine. If you have any that are not in our digital docs, please submit them. I do find there's a problem with submitting larger files (I have many that I haven't been able to submit, but mostly owner's manuals with graphics in them / large files).
 
I agree, excellent job and I'll add a few comments of my own:

1 - doubling a capacitor's WV does NOT increase its life. A better strategy would be to buy quality long-life capacitors to begin with, and/or purchase 105-degree caps instead of 85 degree. A crap capacitor working at 1/4 its WV is still crap and is much more likely to fail than a quality cap running closer to its WV.

2 - Going from carbon comp to carbon film resistors can't be anything but good. More stable and less noise. That said I generally avoid wholesale replacement of resistors unless many are out of tolerance - every time you replace a component you're increasing the chance for PC board damage.

3 - No reason at all to replace transistors, especially those color-marked Mc transistors that have been selected for particular characteristics (which are largely unknown).

4 - It's well worth buying a cheapo vacuum desoldering station (they're about $140 or so) when wholesale replacing components on a PC board. Saves untold time and grief as well as potential damage to the PC board.
 
Very nice work @Refugee

I agree with most of what you did/posted, a few comments:

Increasing the capacitors' voltage by a factor of two because line voltage has gone up? Not really, from a nominal 117VAC when it was built and a large potenial swing, to today's maybe 120VAC with typically smaller swings, I am confident it was already good for a constant 125VAC plus some safety factor, before good computer modeling we had to leave a huge safety margin in engineering.

You didn't change capacitor types, nor values, I applaud your logic. You did however change resistor type, not sure I agree with that one, it can have some affect on sound if in a signal path, also the temperature coefficient will be different, which might have been part of the original design. Just a comment, most (or all) of us wouldn't be able to tell a difference if there is one, but a runaway is a runaway, ... my experience was that we did a lot of testing before we found all of the places we were "tickling the dragon's tail". And the justification that it will last longer than the originals, ... that lasted 50 years? I think the original design was pretty good but your grandchildren might appreciate your attention to detail.

On that same subject, please do rebuild the driver boards and do the SB. There is a failure that can take them out, I've seen it happen, it isn't pretty and that is why the SB exists. You've done a lot of work to see it go up in smoke.

In all, I have to say it looks like you put a lot of the correct time and thought into this project, well done.

Oh, last comment: There are a lot of manuals here in Digital Docs, I don't think people know they're there becase so many people go instead to hifiengine. I know I've submitted several here, but none to hifiengine. If you have any that are not in our digital docs, please submit them. I do find there's a problem with submitting larger files (I have many that I haven't been able to submit, but mostly owner's manuals with graphics in them / large files).
 
I really appreciate your reply. This is the first post I have made here. It is nice to know that people are reading it. I’m pretty conservative when it comes to part replacement and pretty much agree with all you said. Most changes i make are due to availability.
I do plan on implementing the service bulletin. I’m looking for a good deal on an instrument to measure THD. I want to benchmark the amp before I go further. thanks for your input!
 
I agree, excellent job and I'll add a few comments of my own:

1 - doubling a capacitor's WV does NOT increase its life. A better strategy would be to buy quality long-life capacitors to begin with, and/or purchase 105-degree caps instead of 85 degree. A crap capacitor working at 1/4 its WV is still crap and is much more likely to fail than a quality cap running closer to its WV.

2 - Going from carbon comp to carbon film resistors can't be anything but good. More stable and less noise. That said I generally avoid wholesale replacement of resistors unless many are out of tolerance - every time you replace a component you're increasing the chance for PC board damage.

3 - No reason at all to replace transistors, especially those color-marked Mc transistors that have been selected for particular characteristics (which are largely unknown).

4 - It's well worth buying a cheapo vacuum desoldering station (they're about $140 or so) when wholesale replacing components on a PC board. Saves untold time and grief as well as potential damage to the PC board.
1 Agree wholeheartedly on the caps. I should have mentioned the temperature rating.
2 I only replaced resistors that were out of speck. I did however change a few 5% to 1% that were setting the bias for transistors on the output board.
3 I hope you are right. I will know for sure after THD test.
Color marks are for matching output curves of the transistors. I don’t think you can get those UFO looking ones on the output board anymore. I would hate to loose them.
4 Can’t wait to get a vac desolder tool. One day…
 
I think the most expensive part on that SB is the flying-saucer heatsinks. There is a link here somewhere to a decent-price source.
 
Refugee,
Great post --
Really appreciate your time; and awesome, well planned documentation.

This is what makes AK so magical...:banana:

Celadon
 
Very nice! I have the step brother and enjoy listening for hours each and every day. Awesome post and thank you for respecting one of best SS ever made.
 
Mostly all very good advice and I agree with the follow ups as well. I did not replace low value electrolytics with polypropylene for instance. I rebuilt my 2105 (and 2205) last year. Total electrolytic recap and performed the SB. The difference was night and day. I did a LOT of old post reading and replaced quite a few resistors that were known the drift (22ohm, IIRC) and most all key ones, mainly the tight tolerance ones. Virtually all were out of the specified tolerance. The amp runs significantly cooler than it did, and still has all the original Motorola power transistors.

However, I was not concerned at all about keeping the “look” of the resistors. I pretty much stuck to the resistor watt rating, but mainly went metal film resisters with the best temperature co-efficient especially in the audio path. I thought some were already metal film, but now I can’t recall. Yes they are often physically smaller, but then it is very easy to tell which ones were replaced.
 
Back
Top Bottom