cshumphrey
New Member
I did use the 126V tap at first, but the B+ voltage on the tubes was low--maybe 415V if I remember correctly. I liked the sound better with the higher voltages on the 6L6s that came with the 117V tap (about 430V, which is still below spec). As PRWW stated, It's probably not a big deal to run the filaments at 6.5V, so maybe I just leave well enough alone at this point.FWIW, what I always felt was the best way to address the higher filament voltages due to the modern higher mains voltage from the era when these amplifiers were designed, was to simply change the power transformer`s factory default 117 volt tap to the alternate 126 V. tap that is provided to deal with higher mains voltage these amps might be connected to.
Easily done on the 30ties and their higher powered MC-60 brother, and by doing so on mine and every one of these 2 models that have come across my benches since 1975, and doing so have always provided very close to all the schematic`s factory`s voltage values, and the amps seem to appear to operate cooler by doing so, and avoids the insertion of selected low ohm "under the hood" waste heat generating 5 watt or higher sand resistors in the filament circuit feed off the power transformer.
Just a suggestive thought.
On another note, the amp chassis is cooler with the choke. The choke doesn't seem to heat up at all, as opposed to the 150 ohm resistor that is stock for the power supply, which really puts off quite a bit of heat. The voltages on the tubes are identical with the choke vs the resistor. Bass response seems more pleasing with the choke, but that is subjective, of course. So, maybe the lower temperature inside the amp will allow the other components to last longer. This is speculative for sure.
Appreciate your comment, Bill.
Last edited: