It is sure beautiful and it also sounds great - at least the hardware is finelindstrom said:We are still waiting....three months.....but it is a beautiful player. I sure hope they can get it right.
Mine and probably all of them, because it is mostly firmware issues. I have lots of experience working on firmware myself so it is "normal" that I find this stuff at the first look.mike175gr said:Jim777,
That was a really tall list! Do you have a player (or know of one) that does all of that?
Yep, most CDP play a disc like one big wave file and use the index table for display only (and to skip tracks). The mac seems to try to hard to know where each songs begins and ends and tries to do it's trick that way. So I have a disc or two that does this: the player will "stop" 2-3 seconds at the end of a track, then begin playing 2 seconds into the next song. Probably their index isn't standard, but they played ok on my previous Rotel.pathologymd said:Hi everyone,
My SCD201 sounds great, but I too had a firmware issue manifesting as pops at the beginning of and between tracks. I too wish I could rewind into the previous track (all other players I have had will do this).
My upgrade was done about three months ago. Is there a way to see what my firmware version is? I would like to have the latest version.
William
Didn't I say that I don't regret the player at all? I agree that it's a great machine! I only decided to bring up some other funny issues besides playback.rasmussen said:Had mine about two months, maybe a little more. Honestly I was going to say that there were no problems until I read Jim 777's list. I have had 8 or so players since CDs first came out. This one seems just as easy to use and flawless as any but I don't really use a machine in the way Jim does apparently. Go down the list. Ask yourself with each item am I going to do that or need that? Anyway I suspect that with many folks the answer will be no. If so with you then by all means pick one up, they are a nice machine in the price range and mine performs flawlessly. I am listening to mostly redbook. Ok mine is flawed, volume goes down if you spin the knob. Don't spin the volume knob just because it spins (yeah I had to, just like a kid).
Probably the strong point of the machine for me is the way it mates with the 275 amp and sounds without a pre amp.
Hope the simple guy perspective helped. Larry
rasmussen said:Had mine about two months, maybe a little more. Honestly I was going to say that there were no problems until I read Jim 777's list. I have had 8 or so players since CDs first came out. This one seems just as easy to use and flawless as any but I don't really use a machine in the way Jim does apparently. Go down the list. Ask yourself with each item am I going to do that or need that? Anyway I suspect that with many folks the answer will be no. If so with you then by all means pick one up, they are a nice machine in the price range and mine performs flawlessly. I am listening to mostly redbook. Ok mine is flawed, volume goes down if you spin the knob. Don't spin the volume knob just because it spins (yeah I had to, just like a kid).
Probably the strong point of the machine for me is the way it mates with the 275 amp and sounds without a pre amp.
Hope the simple guy perspective helped. Larry
rasmussen said:Does the Arcam sound as good? I would love a player with fast fast fast load time but it is not my main priority. With the built in analog volume control, sweet sound, and balanced out the 201 is my baby. Virtually 100% of my listening is from the chair using the remote to control the machine. Could it be that the 4 times normal spin design is incompatible with some of the improvements you are looking for? Heck I wouldn't be able to say.
But on this forum sometimes people come in fresh looking for an opinion. Mine would be that the player is well worth auditioning in the price range, may have some operating quirks that many listeners would not find as disturbing as some forum members do or indeed even notice.
Larry