Balanced and unbalanced refers to whether you use the XLR input or RCA input respectively, not speaker output. Which is not an option you have given the USP-1 only has unbalanced outputs. Similarly, I use an Emotiva UMC-200 processor feeding an XPA-5 amp and likewise must use unbalanced connections.On my amplifier I can use my speaker wire for “unbalanced” or switch to XLR for “Balanced”.
Balanced and unbalanced refers to whether you use the XLR input or RCA input respectively, not speaker output. Which is not an option you have given the USP-1 only has unbalanced outputs. Similarly, I use an Emotiva UMC-200 processor feeding an XPA-5 amp and likewise must use unbalanced connections.
I do, however, use balanced connections in two other systems.
Those specs state that the MC gain is approximately 60dB (why approximately?) and the MM gain is 40dB, so if the OP's preamp is the same (big if) the MC has 20dB more gain than the MM setting. That would appear quite normal.Guys, note that I used the way Emotiva expressed the gain as "to balanced output". Yes, I understand the traditional way is to state the gain of the phono stage alone to tape output bypassing the line stage.
"Phono (Moving Coil; phono in to balanced out):
Gain (1 kHz, Volume at 0): approximately 60 dB."
TO BALANCED OUTPUT.Those specs state that the MC gain is approximately 60dB
If it were for the phono stage only, yes. It appears to be not. Do you find a tape monitor output that is balanced?That would appear quite normal.
Because "Phono (Moving Coil; phono in to balanced out)" as found on the website and manual is correct?I wonder if there's really a problem at all.
That wasn't my point. The point is that the mc setting is 20dB more than the mm setting. As far as I can tell, the OP was happy when using an mm cartridge.TO BALANCED OUTPUT.
No, I was speculating that there isn't really a problem because the OP can get the system loud enough and hasn't complained of a poor signal-to-noise ratio. He would just prefer the same volume with a lower setting of the volume control, but if it's loud enough, what more do you need?Because "Phono (Moving Coil; phono in to balanced out)" as found on the website and manual is correct?
While the volume is acceptable for my current living situation, I am wanting it to get much louder with the home we will be purchasing over the next few months. I think an SUT is the answer to get this to where I want it to be. I’m thinking a used Denon AU- 300 or 310 would do it.That wasn't my point. The point is that the mc setting is 20dB more than the mm setting. As far as I can tell, the OP was happy when using an mm cartridge.
No, I was speculating that there isn't really a problem because the OP can get the system loud enough and hasn't complained of a poor signal-to-noise ratio. He would just prefer the same volume with a lower setting of the volume control, but if it's loud enough, what more do you need?
Regardless of the position of the gain control, are you able to fully drive the amplifier potentially to clipping?While the volume is acceptable for my current living situation, I am wanting it to get much louder with the home we will be purchasing over the next few months.
It doesn’t seem to unless I’m listening to something with deep bass.Regardless of the position of the gain control, are you able to fully drive the amplifier potentially to clipping?
LOMC cartridges require lots of gain. Seems you need more.It doesn’t seem to unless I’m listening to something with deep bass.
Both the AU-300 and the AU-310 have turns ratios of 1:10 which will give you 20dB gain. Although Emotiva don't give specs for your preamp, if it's the same as the other preamp the mc setting will give you 20dB more gain the mm setting, just the same as using the SUT would. That means using an AU-300 or an AU-310 will be no louder than using your preamp's existing mc setting.I think an SUT is the answer to get this to where I want it to be. I’m thinking a used Denon AU- 300 or 310 would do it.
The short answer is Acoustat 1+1s in the HT and Sound Lab U-1PX in the main system. More details and pics available if you follow the link on my profile page.I appreciate the discussion on this! I’ll prob end up getting an SUT within the next few weeks and I’ll check back in.
I see your username is E Stat- what kind of electrostatic speakers do you have?!
The comparison between the cost of the Xsp1 and the usp1 is about in the two is quite large (the msrp for mine is $500 and the new one is $1200). The usp1 only has the MC option at 240ohms, while the xsp has 100, 470, or 1000 ohm options for MC. Would this cause the xsp to have higher gain when comparing the two?Both the AU-300 and the AU-310 have turns ratios of 1:10 which will give you 20dB gain. Although Emotiva don't give specs for your preamp, if it's the same as the other preamp the mc setting will give you 20dB more gain the mm setting, just the same as using the SUT would. That means using an AU-300 or an AU-310 will be no louder than using your preamp's existing mc setting.
A turns ratio of 1:20 would give you a bit more, but not a huge amount. You'll get about 5dB more.
Wowza, you got fat boys and skinny men. Beautiful setups!The short answer is Acoustat 1+1s in the HT and Sound Lab U-1PX in the main system. More details and pics available if you follow the link on my profile page.
The resistance options have no effect on how much gain there is. They can make a subtle difference to sound quality but don't determine how much gain you will get.The comparison between the cost of the Xsp1 and the usp1 is about in the two is quite large (the msrp for mine is $500 and the new one is $1200). The usp1 only has the MC option at 240ohms, while the xsp has 100, 470, or 1000 ohm options. Would this cause the xsp to have higher gain when comparing the two?
Ditto Rothwell’s answer. The XSP has a balanced output stage which is more related to its additional cost.The comparison between the cost of the Xsp1 and the usp1 is about in the two is quite large (the msrp for mine is $500 and the new one is $1200). The usp1 only has the MC option at 240ohms, while the xsp has 100, 470, or 1000 ohm options for MC. Would this cause the xsp to have higher gain when comparing the two?