All this tells us is that you are accustomed to the short comings of an lpad and thus are accepting to them. That does not mean that problems don’t exist. If you deal with a problem long enough, you come to not even look at it as a problem.I have never had a problem in the 40+ years I have owned JBL's. The only way I could tolerate speakers without variable L-Pads is with crossover switching such as the KLH Fives; three positions. To each his own.
What happens to the leads on the L-Pads? Snip them and use them for the resistors? Anyway you could draw us a quick schematic and post a cell phone pic of it?1 lpad has to be replaced with 2 resistors. 1 in series with the vc and 1 in parallel with the vc. Just to be sure you understand. Performs much better this way, relative to an adjustable lpad. Sadly, so many are afraid to do this and take the easy way out and stick with adjustable lpads.

Yes, the elements in a variable L-Pad are bare wound wire. The wiper tip and the coiled wire of the long element must be bare to make electrical contact. And that bare copper of the long element is what gets so oxidized and corroded. You have to clean off the oxidation as best as you can, but it’s a losing battle. With time, they get badly corroded. Replace them with new variable L-pads, and you still face the same problem.I'm confused. An L-pad is essentially two resistors. Your two resistors are just a fixed L-Pad. What is magical about two fixed resistors? The Wikipedia reference doesn't seem to say fixed resistors are better. Is it because the elements in a variable L-Pad are wire wound?
Every 40 years. You must live on the coast or have your stereo in a damp basement. One thing I wonder about is why 95% of all speakers have some form of adjustable tweeter lever control. If it is cheaper and better why didn't they do it at the factory. How many people are going to bring home a speaker, listen to it for awhile, check the desired L-Pad position, open the speaker up, measure the values of the two L-Pad ratios and bypass the control with two equivalent resistors? And what if your wife thinks the level is too high or too low? It's interesting that the vast majority of AK members who pick up vintage AR speakers with corroded controls clean them up or buy replacements off ebay (cleaned up by someone else) and are happy for many years.Replace them with new variable L-pads, and you still face the same problem.
Probably shocks the heck out of you every time someone finds an old pair of JBL and starts a thread about a tweeter not working . . . and gets this same answer. Several times a year. For over two decades.I have never had a problem in the 40+ years I have owned JBL's. The only way I could tolerate speakers without variable L-Pads is with crossover switching such as the KLH Fives; three positions. To each his own.
Even a perfect variable lpad is inferior to a properly executed fixed resistor pad.Every 40 years. You must live on the coast or have your stereo in a damp basement. One thing I wonder about is why 95% of all speakers have some form of adjustable tweeter lever control. If it is cheaper and better why didn't they do it at the factory. How many people are going to bring home a speaker, listen to it for awhile, check the desired L-Pad position, open the speaker up, measure the values of the two L-Pad ratios and bypass the control with two equivalent resistors? And what if your wife thinks the level is too high or too low? It's interesting that the vast majority of AK members who pick up vintage AR speakers with corroded controls clean them up or buy replacements off ebay (cleaned up by someone else) and are happy for many years.
This is what you do...What happens to the leads on the L-Pads? Snip them and use them for the resistors? Anyway you could draw us a quick schematic and post a cell phone pic of it?
Is 9dB of attenuation close to what you hear with the L-Pads set at 0?
-9dB is pretty close to 1/2 as much perceived volume, similar to the old L-Pad dial right in the middle?This is what you do...
View attachment 2642118
Look here for R 1-4 values.
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-Lpad.htm
These are 8ohm drivers, so look in the 8ohm section and determine how much attenuation you want. I use 9db and get good results for what I do.
Suggestions, use Mills resistors. Double them up to double power handling. For example if R1 is 5ohms, use TWO 10ohm mills resistors in parallel to get the 5ohms rather than a single 5ohm resistor. This doubles the power handling by spreading the heat across two resistors. Its the best way to do it. you get 24watts of power handling rather than 12.
I can't say for sure where 9db of attenuation is on the original lpad. Mine were too scratchy to get a reliable reading. I bought enough resistors to do some "mock set-ups" and test out various levels of attenuation through this I found that 9db of attenuation at the mid and tweeter works perfect for me. I do suspect it to be close to the mid point however.-9dB is pretty close to 1/2 as much perceived volume, similar to the old L-Pad dial right in the middle?
. I am saying that fixed lpads at 9db of attenuation as per the lpad calculator above worked for me after trying out various other amounts of attenuation.Wait, I am confused. So are we trying to achieve 9db attenuation or -9db?
Wow, great info guys. Nice thread! My question is, is it possible to carefully and surgically remove the knobs on the L-pads and shoot DeOxit5 into the shaft to get it into the potentiometer enclosure that way?
No matter how you go about it, any improvement you get by using deoxit on the lpad will be short lived. An lpad is not a pot like a volume control, balance control, tone control etc.
Replacing lpads with mills resistors has absolutely yielded positive results in my experience.I see. Well then soldering in some resistors may be worth my time and effort. Did you say that you have done this with positive results?
I agree.I have the L100s and NS1000 and they are as they were.To each their own.I appreciate the work done to improve the crossover networks that people have done. Some really exhaustive research and tinkering with graphs to prove the improvements etc.
Personally and this is just my opinion, it would kill the character and charm for me.
If I want improved sonics I listen to some different speakers. In my case I listen to NS-1000's or some British monitors. Way more accurate and revealing but not as much fun or nostalgic when the mood strikes for vintage sound from my younger days.
I say keep them original but to each his own. One of the great things about this hobby. Enjoy them regardless.
![]()