• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

New RCA cables. Sound is horrible.

This thread is why I love cd's. Who'd have thought dragging a volcano-created rock through polyvinyl chloride embedded with tiny bumps would be a fussy and difficult medium?

Imagine my own fear when, after mounting and setting aside 3 years or so ago, my Shibata stylus and Shure V15 type 2 decided to not have a left channel.
I remounted the stylus. I tried all the usual grimy switches, cables, etc.

After spritzing where the wires mount at the end of the cart and into the tip that feeds into the arm, it came to life.

Vinyl is a huge asz-pain. I love it just like I love women, but yeah, total azz-pain.
 
I'd still like for the OP to twist the copper strands in a leftover section of the new Mogami cable to confirm that it's not CCA (which would be fake). There's no mistaking CCA for solid copper when you twist the strands -- copper stays twisted, and CCA is pretty limp.

Using a test record.

I was initially dismissive of this because LP test records don't grow on trees, but they are available -- so it's probably not a bad idea.
 
Using a test record.

I have several test records, but did not realize I could use them to measure frequency response directly.

I guess you could do a digital recording of a frequency sweep from a low-use test record and then process it with something like Audacity to generate a plot?

Would your goal be to either refute or substantiate what the OP said he was hearing?

Personally, I might consider such an undertaking if I was concerned about a specific portion of the response. But if I was hearing gross distortion, I'd probably just trust my ears to tell me that I have a bigger problem than, for example, a roll-off occurring 500Hz sooner than spec.
 
Last edited:
I have several test records, but did not realize I could use them to measure frequency response directly.
Play a vinyl test record containing "white" or "pink" noise and view the audio output of the preamp on a spectrum analyzer. This should give you a frequency plot across the band. You could use peak hold on the spectrum analyzer to generate a single line display.

Example:
Screenshot 2026-01-28 175617.jpg
 
If only I had a spectrum analyzer! :thumbsup:

Fortunately, my turntables sound pretty good to me. Enogh so that I don't want to know if they are deficient. :)
Recording in Audacity and then use REW. For gross changes one can use pink noise and apply a calibration curve for pink noise in REW. Sweeps from Ortofon test record is quite accurate if one apply a certain correction first. Depends what test records you have.

Measurements are good when tracking problems that needs to be fixed.
 
????? Use your sound card and REW live, as it was meant to be used. No need to introduce Audacity into this . . .

(And pink noise, by it's very definition, should be flat in an analyzer with no tweaking . . . as I can confirm in SMAART and my hardware based RTA . . . *white* noise, however . . . )
 
????? Use your sound card and REW live, as it was meant to be used. No need to introduce Audacity into this . . .

(And pink noise, by it's very definition, should be flat in an analyzer with no tweaking . . . as I can confirm in SMAART and my hardware based RTA . . . *white* noise, however . . . )
no.

 
no.

Then you need to argue the point with the measurement industry, since thier gear certainly thinks it it is . . . (and SMAART is one of the professional standards)

I suspect that you are getting confused by the definitions, and how analyzers display. White is even energy across the linear spectrum (which analyzers do *NOT* typically display) and pink is equal energy *per octave* as in the way a graphic eq works and an analyzer displays. Heck, even the second image down in your link shows pink displaying flat on a octive based analyzer display . . .

White noise is basically useless for sound system testing, and isn't even typically offered as a test signal.


 
A while back, someone said "Pink Noise." I thought he was talking about her in concert.

7d88a394-d07b-4fb3-b838-541e2323a682.gif
 
Then you need to argue the point with the measurement industry, since thier gear certainly thinks it it is . . . (and SMAART is one of the professional standards)

I suspect that you are getting confused by the definitions, and how analyzers display. White is even energy across the linear spectrum (which analyzers do *NOT* typically display) and pink is equal energy *per octave* as in the way a graphic eq works and an analyzer displays. Heck, even the second image down in your link shows pink displaying flat on a octive based analyzer display . . .

White noise is basically useless for sound system testing, and isn't even typically offered as a test signal.
Well I am measuring it another way - I like storing things in wav - and importing a pink noise file into REW needs 10 dB/decade correction. Since not many records contain good sweeps or pink noise; I left those rather poor tracks long time ago for high quality sweeps (CA-TRS1007/Ortofon).


'
 
Back
Top Bottom