Methinks that some confuse "break in" with just plain "broken"![]()
Or just "broke" if you buy esoteric cables
Methinks that some confuse "break in" with just plain "broken"![]()
"Brokeback cables"Or just "broke" if you buy esoteric cables![]()

It takes a lot of work but the payoff is amazingVinyl is a huge asz-pain. I love it just like I love women, but yeah, total azz-pain.
Using a test record.How should he have done that?
Using a test record.
Using a test record.
Play a vinyl test record containing "white" or "pink" noise and view the audio output of the preamp on a spectrum analyzer. This should give you a frequency plot across the band. You could use peak hold on the spectrum analyzer to generate a single line display.I have several test records, but did not realize I could use them to measure frequency response directly.

Recording in Audacity and then use REW. For gross changes one can use pink noise and apply a calibration curve for pink noise in REW. Sweeps from Ortofon test record is quite accurate if one apply a certain correction first. Depends what test records you have.If only I had a spectrum analyzer!
Fortunately, my turntables sound pretty good to me. Enogh so that I don't want to know if they are deficient.![]()
no.????? Use your sound card and REW live, as it was meant to be used. No need to introduce Audacity into this . . .
(And pink noise, by it's very definition, should be flat in an analyzer with no tweaking . . . as I can confirm in SMAART and my hardware based RTA . . . *white* noise, however . . . )
Then you need to argue the point with the measurement industry, since thier gear certainly thinks it it is . . . (and SMAART is one of the professional standards)no.
![]()
Pink Noise VS White Noise - What's The Difference? – Acoustic Fields
Pink noise is a type of noise that is commonly used in room acoustics to evaluate the performance of a space. It is named after the way it appears on awww.acousticfields.com
Well I am measuring it another way - I like storing things in wav - and importing a pink noise file into REW needs 10 dB/decade correction. Since not many records contain good sweeps or pink noise; I left those rather poor tracks long time ago for high quality sweeps (CA-TRS1007/Ortofon).Then you need to argue the point with the measurement industry, since thier gear certainly thinks it it is . . . (and SMAART is one of the professional standards)
I suspect that you are getting confused by the definitions, and how analyzers display. White is even energy across the linear spectrum (which analyzers do *NOT* typically display) and pink is equal energy *per octave* as in the way a graphic eq works and an analyzer displays. Heck, even the second image down in your link shows pink displaying flat on a octive based analyzer display . . .
White noise is basically useless for sound system testing, and isn't even typically offered as a test signal.
You do have one. You are typing on it right now. (don't tell me your computer has no sound card installed)If only I had a spectrum analyzer!
mine hasn't got one .. not all computers are the same .You do have one. You are typing on it right now. (don't tell me your computer has no sound card installed)