• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Ortofon Red - why such hate?

Chet63

Active Member
i am running for couple of weeks mine brand new technics sl-1500c with ortofon red cart...browsing the net i can't avoid massive hate against ortofon red...according to some, it is the worst cart ever, awful, not worthy of anyone's attention, have bad stylus, full of igd, is harsh and unbearable, etc...

mine impressions are just the opposite, it has balanced sound with pretty good 3d...if i noticed some sibilants or igd it is mostly due to the record itself...i checked those records on my second tt with totally different cart and it is more or less the same, not so great pressing or record is already ruined by some previous owner...i've heard better, but it's not so bad either...at the same time, many red owners are happy campers....i've rarely see such polarized opinions, there must be some reason for it? cart is sensitive to the rest of the system or what?
 
Register to hide this ad
IIRC Ortofon tweaked the Red after all the hate - published in a magazine not just internet opinion. Can't remember which tho'.
So for the past 10-ish years they have been more polished than the rough original.

That said, the Blue is a real step up.
 
i am running for couple of weeks mine brand new technics sl-1500c with ortofon red cart...browsing the net i can't avoid massive hate against ortofon red...according to some, it is the worst cart ever, awful, not worthy of anyone's attention, have bad stylus, full of igd, is harsh and unbearable, etc...

mine impressions are just the opposite, it has balanced sound with pretty good 3d...if i noticed some sibilants or igd it is mostly due to the record itself...i checked those records on my second tt with totally different cart and it is more or less the same, not so great pressing or record is already ruined by some previous owner...i've heard better, but it's not so bad either...at the same time, many red owners are happy campers....i've rarely see such polarized opinions, there must be some reason for it? cart is sensitive to the rest of the system or what?

I guess it depends on what you are referencing it against for similar $$$...
 
Not liking something is not the same as hating it.
fair enough, i heard some criticism about some other carts here and there, but people spoke against red with such passion i wonder is it something personal :) my point is do the red really deserve such harsh words because i think it is pretty good and i heard much worse in the same price bracket ( grado, wink wink)...
 
Your point about bad pressings being the real culprit rings true. I have a couple of records that sizzle on the inner grooves no matter which deck or cart they meet, and no alignment tweak has ever rescued them.
On a Red, though, the thing that surprised me most was how much the tiniest VTA and overhang error changes the treble. Get it slightly off and the top end turns glassy, which is probably where half of that internet passion comes from. Dial it in properly on a well-isolated table and it just behaves.
So no, it is not a bad cartridge. It is an honest one that tells you the truth about your setup and your records. That is not the same thing as being harsh.
 
I didn't like the red pre fitted on a rega I bought some years ago. Just felt a little bland really.

I also think there are better value options out there if buying new, AT3600L, VM95 or a decent (? black diamond) stylus for a Shure or Pickering body.
 
i've rarely see such polarized opinions, there must be some reason for it? cart is sensitive to the rest of the system or what?

Differences between different exemplars aside, I could imagine, that quite a bit of the dislike also came from the 2M Red just not being attractively priced, when it appeared on the market (ca. 18 or 19 years ago, iirc). Back then it was quite a good bit more expensive than an OM10, about the same price as an Audio Technica AT120E and not much cheaper than for example a 520II - so it simply wasn't exactly a smart choice to get a 2M Red.

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini
 
I've run the OM series near to forever and can't see a reason to change. The OM20 stylus is a good step up. The OM30 is the sweet spot, but more than I like to spend. No idea why they didn't just stick with the OM/OM Super.
 
I find that transducers like cartridges and speakers are both much more reliant on the match up with the other co-operative components to deliver satisfactory outcomes.

For the cartridge, the entire analogue assemblage of turntable/arm/phono stage factor-into the end result of cartridge evaluation. For the speaker the co-operative factors influencing the speaker evaluations are the partnering amp/partnering system and the partnering room.

For those reasons every evaluation of cartridges and speakers are never about the cartridge and speaker in isolation. I always consider speaker evaluations as being system evaluations for that reason. Especially when the speaker is negatively criticised.

Edit: That does not mean that I won't consider that there are bad speakers or cartridges. Just that assessments of either necessarly involve the other contributing factors rather than the items in isolation.
 
Last edited:
I bought one in 2012 and could just never get it to track well. It had a lot of sibilance and IGD. I replaced it with a VM95-SH and it solved most of my issues. Over the years I’ve messed around with a couple of OM10’s and thought they were much better trackers. Even the cheap as chips AT3600L and VM95C performed better in my experience than that early example of the 2M Red. My whole experience with that cartridge was just disappointing. This was all experienced on a Technics SL-D2.
 
I had retired my TT a few years back. Still had the original Pickering ?? on it, but I bought a new stylus for it and dusted it off. I wasn't dissatisfied, but did want to jump into warmer waters. So I bought a Ortofon Red, was very happy with it by comparison. I wasn't interested in looking for the best, and I was actually trying to find something period specific for my Pioneer PL-560. Got super lucky IMO and found a NOS SAE 1000lt did some studying on it, and found it was night and day by comparison. Low's thumped harder and highs were detailed. No hate for the red, I still use it on used records that may not be in pristine condition. There's always better, but sometimes ... just sometimes, the best dance for YOU, can be with the girl you brought to the party.

Garry~
 
I think that speaking ill of the red is more of a trend than a reflection of reality. A few months ago, I happened to get my hands on a red, and honestly, I don’t think it sounds bad at all. I tested it on a Denon DP37F, a Technics 1600MK2, and a Pioneer PL518, and I definitely don’t believe it deserves this much bashing.
 
i am running for couple of weeks mine brand new technics sl-1500c with ortofon red cart...browsing the net i can't avoid massive hate against ortofon red...according to some, it is the worst cart ever, awful, not worthy of anyone's attention, have bad stylus, full of igd, is harsh and unbearable, etc...

mine impressions are just the opposite, it has balanced sound with pretty good 3d...if i noticed some sibilants or igd it is mostly due to the record itself...i checked those records on my second tt with totally different cart and it is more or less the same, not so great pressing or record is already ruined by some previous owner...i've heard better, but it's not so bad either...at the same time, many red owners are happy campers....i've rarely see such polarized opinions, there must be some reason for it? cart is sensitive to the rest of the system or what?
I've never owned a 2M Red, but it was interesting reading various reviews of it. One did address your comment about associated equipment. In his first review he found that "the Ortofon 2M Red was very bright and forward sounding with excessive noise," and he received manufacturer feedback that he "did not give the 2M Red enough break-in time." In a later review, and trying different equipment, he wrote:

"What a difference matching the right components can make. There was a significant improvement over my previous experience, especially with the excessive noise disappearing. I am surprised the manufacturer did not point out that the Red’s high output might have overloaded my stereo system and that component matching is critical. Once the noise was reduced, wonderful clarity became apparent. The bass was fairly deep. The midrange is a little more forward than my Sumiko Rainier ($149) and Olympia ($199). The previously-excessive highs were gone and balance between channels was even."

Another review offered this possibility:

"The Ortofon 2M Red is certainly a very entertaining cartridge, providing a big, solid, spacious sound with good detail and excellent dynamics. The delivery is crisp and punchy across the entire frequency range, with a particularly nicely textured bass, and can be very impressive on well-recorded material. So why the divided opinions from other users? This is still a bit of a mystery to me. I have even wondered about the possibility of sample variations – perhaps I have a particularly good example, though I doubt it. The slight treble brightness is probably at the root of some people’s dissatisfaction with this cartridge. I would certainly counsel against using it in a bright system, although its sparkle and dynamics could be invaluable in pepping up a dull system. So, my advice would be to consider this cartridge seriously but proceed with caution, depending on your system and tastes."

The above two comments both make sense to me. With regard to output level, the importers of three different pieces of gear I've owned cautioned against using any cartridge with an output higher than 5.0 mV at 1 kHz, 5 cm/s, and while the 2M Red is only slightly higher than that, it's enough to keep me from wanting one. With regard to tonal balance, an earlier comment in the second review cited above compared the 2M Red with the M97xE, saying, "The 2M Red is in stark contrast to the (now discontinued) Shure M97xE, which also retailed for under £100. The warm, comfy sound of the Shure is replaced with a sound that seems so much more alive in terms of dynamics and detail. But this is all down to taste." My taste happens to be in the direction of warm and comfy; I loved the M97xE while it was still in production, and that same reviewer described the AT3600L that I've been happy with for most of the last 4 1/2 years as, "it is a very easy listen and thoroughly entertaining. Its warm tones and gentle treble will appeal to a lot of people."
 
I bought one in 2012 and could just never get it to track well. It had a lot of sibilance and IGD. I replaced it with a VM95-SH and it solved most of my issues.
But that is not a very fair comparison. Not only pricewise, but a nude shibata will always completely outperform a bonded elliptical.

And I think that is also how the 2M Red should be regarded, a simple, bondel elliptical. Trackingwise...they pretty much all perform the same as tracking (or mistracking) performance is 99% a stylus shape (and stylus condition) matter. A bonded elliptical is and stays a bonded elliptical.
Should the 2M red for that get a lot of critisism? I think one should look at it's price (like @lini already said). At the time when the 2M Red was launched it's cost was I think around €80 (currently €90). At that time, it's main competitor, the famous AT-95e could still be had (as OEM packeage) for only €24,-
That is a big difference, for a cartridge that performs roughly the same.
That said, a Nagaoka MP110 is €160, and for that money you can buy an AT-VM95ML which will devastate the MP110 in any IGD/sibilance test all day long.
 
I think that speaking ill of the red is more of a trend than a reflection of reality. A few months ago, I happened to get my hands on a red, and honestly, I don’t think it sounds bad at all. I tested it on a Denon DP37F, a Technics 1600MK2, and a Pioneer PL518, and I definitely don’t believe it deserves this much bashing.

It seemed from the outside that the red was the stock cart on a few tables for a bit, and i think upgraditis had an effect on public opinion. Maybe it was a bad match for some of those arms.

Folks always poo poo the lower offerings anyways.
 
fair enough, i heard some criticism about some other carts here and there, but people spoke against red with such passion i wonder is it something personal :) my point is do the red really deserve such harsh words because i think it is pretty good and i heard much worse in the same price bracket ( grado, wink wink)...
If you like it, don't worry about the reviews. :thumbsup:

Honestly, you could have the most $$$, "high-end perfect" setup known to mankind, and some knuckleheads on the Interweb are going to shade it. That's what they do.

f7efb3b9-be77-44d7-94e2-2d15e383e5d9.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom