Do it... finish it. Do not sell it!!HBTim
Really encouraging to hear you prefer your Pilot
SA-232 to your Fisher SA-100.
Encouraging because I have a Pilot 232 "Stereo Plus" 3 Channel "Curtain of Sound" amp that I never completed.
It was moved to the back burner when a Fisher SA-100 came along. Then a Fisher SA300B came along and the Pilot went on the back burner again.
Every so often I think about selling the Pilot "for parts, as is" but curiosity has "kept me hanging on."
After reading how happy you are with your Pilot, I'm encouraged to eventually complete that project.
Thank you.
Yup... me too.I'd actually like to hear an SA-232 against my SA-260. Same basic front end design but totally different output tubes. Would make for an interesting comparison.
In time. Right now I'm enjoying the music.Do it... finish it. Do not sell it!!
Oh man, you said it.In time. Right now I'm enjoying the music.
One great thing about a new component revealing things never heard before in a recording is that I get to discover my record collection all over again.
Pilot made some very good stuff. While not a Marantz or Mcintosh most of their products easily out performed Scott and Fisher. Pilot was right up there with Citation as I remember.
The way I heard it put from a guy who repaired a lot of tube amps was that Marantz and McIntosh stuff had better build quality than Pilot, but Pilot was on par with both as far as sound.Pilot made some very good stuff. While not a Marantz or Mcintosh most of their products easily out performed Scott and Fisher. Pilot was right up there with Citation as I remember.
When the amplifier is used stand alone without the Pilot preamp there is a eleven pin plug that needs to be fitted into the eleven pin socket. The plug accomplishes two things: 1) completes the AC connection to power up the amplifier and 2) engages a resistor load to make up for the current (approximately 10mA) that would have been used by the preamplifier, if it were connected. If one examines the SAMS schematic, one can see that R92 (6800Ω) and R97 (15kΩ) are the load resistors. The resistor load is needed to drop the supply voltage for the 145V source that feeds the 12AU7 front end. If the preamp is connected, the R97 load resistor is disconnected and draws no current. If the preamp is not used, the two resistors are connected and draw the equivalent preamp current. The power transformer sees the same HV power supply load if the preamp is connected or not. The preamp filament current is provided by a separate tap on the power transformer.The SP210 only uses a few ma of current. I doubt the power trafo is grossly oversized just to get that done but not being shy on the power supply is certainly not a bad thing. My best sounding amps have arguably overkill power supplies....
Hi Mike,
Hi Mike,
Thank you so much for the schematic. I spent a fair amount of time looking on the internet for a schematic and came up with only a very blurry, very difficult to read copy.
Thank you.![]()
![]()
I am glad you did too. I am also currently servicing / rebuilding a pair of SA-232....I'm rebuilding a SA-232 currently and went through the same thing...a blurry unreadable Sams schematic.
Undeterred, I scrounged harder. I lucked out and came across the original SA-232 schematic in pdf, and I'm glad I did.
The Pilot specifies 115VAC on the chassis, however; both the SAMS and the Pilot schematics indicates117VAC line voltage test conditons.Keep in mind the Sams schematic shows a little higher voltages than the Pilot schematic for some reason...
The SAMS shows that the 270 ohm resistors are optional. My guess is that they are there to stop parasitic oscillations.What I'm unfamiliar with is they only have one 270 ohm screen resistor for each push-pull pair, with one resistor on the blue primary side, with the other push-pull pair having the resistor on the brown primary side. They just wire the OPT's B+ to a screen pin, and then run a 270 ohm resistor to pin 9 of the other tube. It would seem to make a indifference in screen voltage...maybe it's a balance sort of thing. I have no idea...
gadget73's post explains well the reason for the 25V bias on the filaments.The center tap of the 6.3 volt winding has .047uF cap, and 39K resistor to ground. The schematic indicates 25 volts at this cap and resistor. From there, a 330K resistor goes in series to the phase inverter plate resistors. The 100K plate/anode resistors for the phase inverter are 5%. Is this some sort of a bias scheme for the inverter tube? (diode bias?)
Yes, this is a puzzle.Is it built like the schematic shows? That is strange. Normally I'd expect one resistor per screen, or one that was common to both but not this. Best guess is its some sort of stability mechanism but why they put them on opposite sides per channel is beyond me. If they were doing it for some sort of balance deal it would seem it needs to be on the same leg on both channels.