
I wouldn't worry about it. Most of the rpm counter apps are a bit off.
Not having a lot to do today and just for the heck of it I decided to check some of my turntables with my Pixel 7 Pro. The results are about what I expected.
They are pretty consistent but it would be interesting to see if the wow figures would be less if there was a way to get the accelerometer positioned exactly over the spindle. I bet some of the variability can be attributed to it being not centered.
The belt drive AR has an oldish belt and had very little attention or recent use and has no speed adjustment. The other belters (ST-7 and PS-2400) have strobes, older belts and were somewhat dialed in. The SP-15 was tested with Quartz Lock on and off. The KD-650, PS-X600 and Denon are QL only. The 1229 is of course idler drive with strobe.
View attachment 2815171 View attachment 2815172 View attachment 2815173
0.02%! My Denon DP-35F gets 0.05% and I thought that was good. Have you given your bearings/motors a thorough cleaning and oiling?
I have a rush 2112 that is so off center that I thought I was having a stroke.Exactly.
A lot of people is obsessed with turntable specs where most records are not even centered and has a W&F more than 1%.
I get consistent results that match a strobe when using the RPM wow app on my android phone. My best turntable is a Lenco L75 that measures consistently at 0.04 RMS wow. Surprisingly my Rega P3 (with Tangospinner sub-platter and dual belt pulley) measures identical to my Dual 1019 at 0.08 wow. I think the main factor for measuring RPM/wow with a phone app is to make sure that the phone is precisely centered over the turntable platter spindle so the display does not wobble at all.Not having a lot to do today and just for the heck of it I decided to check some of my turntables with my Pixel 7 Pro. The results are about what I expected.
They are pretty consistent but it would be interesting to see if the wow figures would be less if there was a way to get the accelerometer positioned exactly over the spindle. I bet some of the variability can be attributed to it being not centered.
The belt drive AR has an oldish belt and had very little attention or recent use and has no speed adjustment. The other belters (ST-7 and PS-2400) have strobes, older belts and were somewhat dialed in. The SP-15 was tested with Quartz Lock on and off. The KD-650, PS-X600 and Denon are QL only. The 1229 is of course idler drive with strobe.
View attachment 2815171 View attachment 2815172 View attachment 2815173
I get consistent results that match a strobe when using the RPM wow app on my android phone. My best turntable is a Lenco L75 that measures consistently at 0.04 RMS wow. Surprisingly my Rega P3 (with Tangospinner sub-platter and dual belt pulley) measures identical to my Dual 1019 at 0.08 wow. I think the main factor for measuring RPM/wow with a phone app is to make sure that the phone is precisely centered over the turntable platter spindle so the display does not wobble at all.
Yup! Absolutely. Otherwise it doesn't reflect playback speed. Stylus drag counts!needle needs to be down,
Not having a lot to do today and just for the heck of it I decided to check some of my turntables with my Pixel 7 Pro. The results are about what I expected.
I think that Sony PS-2400 is in need of a mechanical and electronics overhaul. It was specced for much better W&F figures, actually very similar to the PS-2500 which is very good in this respect.
Very nice machine that deserves some love (Sony fan here.)
Thanks. It hasn't seen much use lately and was just hooked up for this test. I should give it some attention. Aesthetically it's one of my favourites and I even splurged on an expensive dustcover replacement as the original had a damaged corner though was still fully serviceable. Not many people know this model.