It has pointed out that your percepotion of rapid self destruction is flawed. The protection you seem to propose appear to be tailored for those who continously abuse an amplifier.
As I mentioned just before there is no protection against stupidity in either operating (turning volume up when no sound comes out) or installing badly (using banana connectors): if cables are screwed down then they will not be disconnected.
It has pointed out that your percepotion of rapid self destruction is flawed. The protection you seem to propose appear to be tailored for those who continously abuse an amplifier.

Flyback diodes were used in PA valve amps from at least 1960 from examples I have seen. Ampeg started using them in circa 1970, and Fender circa 1990 from schematics I have come across - but Marshall didn't use flyback diodes. Commercial and music industry equipment was likely more prone to accidental speaker disconnections or no connections, and had to work in a more robust manner by way of industry reputation. It is the leakage inductance, especially of PA and guitar amp OPTs, that means the 'high voltage flying' anode terminal is not directly protected by flyback diodes - and there are scope plots around that show how well a guitar amp can cause anode voltages to fly.
Note that a disconnected speaker may not be the only fault a valve amp has to endure during its lifetime, so if the amp has valuable or unobtainable parts then thinking about protection is well worthwhile 'a priori'.
I agree that flyback diodes will prevent overvoltage. But ( there is always a "but") a flyback diode that shorts will create a large current in the transformer, maybe destroying the transformer. If flyback diodes are correctly dimensioned the probability for shorts are slim and i think acceptable. But recommending the general population this might cause more harm then salvage as both the engineering decisions and quality of components may be bad. A resistor on the other hand is a more forgivable and if it fails it is generally burning open ( thus no worse then before providing the load stays connected)
Precedent.How did this thread go from protection (or not ) an OPT in a HiFi Sansui rfeceiver to protection speakers in a guitar amplifier? Different requirements altogether!
How did this thread go from protection (or not ) an OPT in a HiFi Sansui rfeceiver to protection speakers in a guitar amplifier? Different requirements altogether!
Wow.
I realize that not everyone is an electrical engineer, or has even studied basic electrical engineering as a hobby. But it would be beneficial if you would perform some basic research or reading before hurling your excrement around like an angry chimpanzee engaged in thread crapping. If you do not like the thread, elsewhere read. Simple solution.
The issue at hand is simply stated: how to prevent arcing from an unloaded output transformer which acts as an ignition coil.
Guitar amplifiers routinely experience speaker connection and disconnection, greatly increasing the risk of disconnection of the speaker, either prior to use or during use, and therefore greatly increasing the need for protection against destruction of the output transformer, and output stage.
I clearly explained how flyback diodes protect the output transformer, regardless of whether it is HiFi or guitar. This functioning has been confirmed by others. No detrimental sonic effects are experienced. Problem solved!
I simply cannot fathom why this basic solution is contentious or disputed. It simply boggles the mind.
The circuit used to be called a tweeter saver, and it is a series RC circuit placed across the common to 16 ohm tap on the OPT. It was something like 47 ohms with a 0.22uF cap in series or thereabouts. It prevents HF runaway when the amp has no external load connected. The power it consumes in the audio range is to small to worry about.
Amplifiers that are continiously clipping are a total different proposition than HiFi amplifiers that should never be run into clipping.