Not sure what that means, but it's notable that Waldrep did a double-blind test on power leads under circumstances that seem ideal for finding differences, and he found no differences. Whilst this is a single, presumably informal study that bears much repeating to build a body of evidence, it suggests that maybe at least some of the $3000 power leads owe more to salesmanship and customer gullibility than engineering and differences in sound.Some points but he lacks knowledge like most others
Possibly, but it's also a very sharp strategy in terms of the test he's done: He can't be accused of allowing the benefit of the high-resolution power cable to be masked by inadequate interconnects and speaker wire.PPS It does seem that the fellow sees value in the interconnects and speaker wire though. Otherwise why would he allow Audience cable into it. Why not use studio standard wire like Mogami or Canare? So there does seem to a flip side to the coin.
Possibly, but it's also a very sharp strategy in terms of the test he's done: He can't be accused of allowing the benefit of the high-resolution power cable to be masked by inadequate interconnects and speaker wire.
Whether he installed the Audience cables because he believed in them, or installed them because Audience donated them, or installed them because he planned to do A/B tests later, or installed them for some other reason, or even for all these reasons, doesn't matter. The conclusion still stands: He can't be accused of allowing the benefit of the high-resolution power cable to be masked by inadequate interconnects and speaker wire.The way you word this makes it seem like he made the choice of using Audience to provide a no compromise test for the power cable. This is not the case. He allowed the Audience cable to go in as a mainstay of his recording studio. The question becomes this. Was it because he felt there was an advantage of using it. Or did he do it because Audience is footing the bill? And if so, does he think Canare or Mogami would be of equal quality and performance? He does not address that last question, so there is no way to have a definitive answer. Your posts appears to place a motive to his actions that cannot be verified.
Good point, but are high-end electrical cables purported to compensate for line noise, or do they do something else?One thing that stands out to me about the article is that he doesn't describe the electrical system supplying his studio. Is it just straight from the pole to his outlets, so to speak?
Whether he installed the Audience cables because he believed in them, or installed them because Audience donated them, or installed them because he planned to do A/B tests later, or installed them for some other reason, or even for all these reasons, doesn't matter. The conclusion still stands: He can't be accused of allowing the benefit of the high-resolution power cable to be masked by inadequate interconnects and speaker wire.