• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Really Rare Acoustic Research receiver help needed.

Thanks again Thierry. I'm sure that I have the same service manual. My schematic literacy is not as good as it should be — I admit — but the manual could be better in some ways too. I'll go with my best judgement and see what happens.

I've got lots of work to do before I power the unit up. I already have all the parts to rebuild the power supply and the tone board. It's not going to look stock — no multi-section cans for example. But the only mods will be ones suggested in the manual if in fact they apply to my serial number. Mine is AU23046 ... fairly late ... and has no bias pots. — Lorne
 
The receiver's amplifier is a transformer interstage coupled early transistor design. It is wierd to work on but repairs can be made as we fixed one of these sometime in the past. It was designed to match the AR3A, AR2ax, and the other 4 ohm speakers they built. Oddly enough they proved to be rugged. The Citation 12 was about the only other amplifier that could handle the load. Dyna stereo 120 amps blew like crazy with AR3as.
All true, and I had some of each! Love the sound of those AR AU! I should have never sold this one!
IMG_4498.JPG
 
I've not written on this thread for years. My AR amplifier is still sitting in a basket. A rebuild kit remains stashed somewhere. It's on my list of projects. It's an interesting, classic piece that IMHO reflects some construction methods belonging to the tube era. It's remarkably compact, simple and looks elegant. My salient remark here is sparked by some stories of disasters and failures of this amp model. I ran my AR amplifier on nearly a daily basis for 15 years — hours and hours listening to CBC FM as I studied and did my chores. It ran very hot (correctable with some advised revisions). And years later, it entertained friends who owned much richer, contemporary equipment. They respected this amp that gave a musical performance. By then, the1980's, it was already a rather rare relic of the past.

Around about 2000, just before I was to pack the AR away and lug it to Japan to where I had emmigrated, my best friend and I did a shoot out against his recent NAD model. WHAM! We ran the **** outa these two units on some very good speakers and some profoundly decent source. Then we had coffee and reviewed what we had heard. The result was rather surprising, especially since the AR had sat unused for years, and all the capacitors must have been boiled for over a decade of running hot.

We concluded that the two were rather similar, but the AR exhibited more "grain". That's the best word we could put on it. We were both rather surprised. But I should mention that we were playing my friend's favored catalog — rock and loud stuff. Not harpsichord, chamber music, or symphony orchestra. I like to hear the violas discernible from the violins, and the bassoons heard amid the French horns. Only a restoration and the approved alterations will give me a real estimation of just how good, or flawed this amp really is. In the early 1970's, it was an affordable introduction to decent, solid state. And it was a good way to drive AR speakers, as I was able to witness at the time.

I am reminded of a retrospective I read some years ago in a well-known audio journal — the AR being given some reflection of a bygone era. The final words were, to the best of my recollection: "The AR is a NAD with balls."

 
Last edited:
"I've not written on this thread for years"

Good to see you here. 15 years later.
 
Back
Top Bottom