Av, your platter appears to be riding a lot higher than where Marc set mine at about 1/8"-3/16" above the edge of the plinth. Am I seeing that correctly?

Nice Woodie. Hot in AUBURN?

Can you quantify exactly what was so good about the AR? What was the measured speed accuracy, W&F, rumble? Also, let's talk about the arm, IMO it wasn't that good. My Technics had a low mass straight arm, and it way out performed the AR in its ability to track a warped record.The motor is small for a reason, and it's not price. Having a motor just big enough to keep the platter at speed, even if needing help getting started is a good thing for SQ.
more than one audio reviewer has stated the AR XA was their first taste of "The real high end".
In stock form it outperformed a Technics SL 1200MKII, and a Thorens TD166MKII I have here, not too shabby for a less than entry level belt drive.
The little table that could reigned supreme here for close to 2decades before "The Rock" Kenwood KD500 / Grace G707 knocked it off its throne.
My Technics had a low mass straight arm, and it way out performed the AR in its ability to track a warped record.
Can you quantify exactly what was so good about the AR? What was the measured speed accuracy, W&F, rumble? Also, let's talk about the arm, IMO it wasn't that good. My Technics had a low mass straight arm, and it way out performed the AR in its ability to track a warped record.
Can you quantify exactly what was so good about the AR? What was the measured speed accuracy, W&F, rumble? Also, let's talk about the arm, IMO it wasn't that good. My Technics had a low mass straight arm, and it way out performed the AR in its ability to track a warped record.
I always took care of my vinyl, but I did have 3 other siblings that were not always careful. Please! Let me be clear: I don't dislike the AR table at all, and I'm all for the OP doing a restoration. That said, I spent many years using the AR table with an Ortofon MC and SUT, and I think a lot of the hype is legend. We also had an AR AU amp. that was great in the day, but seriously? Who uses inter-stage transformers on a solid state amplifier anymore!a numbers guy eh?
I listen to music not numbers.
added to that I have a couple thousand records and none are warped enough to be an issue with any of my seven tables, you should take better care of your vinyl investment.
you haven't stated what Technics table you had that was better, the SL1200MKII certainly isn't.I always took care of my vinyl, but I did have 3 other siblings that were not always careful. Please! Let me be clear: I don't dislike the AR table at all, and I'm all for the OP doing a restoration. That said, I spent many years using the AR table with an Ortofon MC and SUT, and I think a lot of the hype is legend. We also had an AR AU amp. that was great in the day, but seriously? Who uses inter-stage transformers on solid state amplifier anymore!
Yup, and I'm not going to go down this rat hole with you.you haven't stated what Technics table you had that was better, the SL1200MKII certainly isn't.


I always took care of my vinyl, but I did have 3 other siblings that were not always careful. Please! Let me be clear: I don't dislike the AR table at all, and I'm all for the OP doing a restoration. That said, I spent many years using the AR table with an Ortofon MC and SUT, and I think a lot of the hype is legend. We also had an AR AU amp. that was great in the day, but seriously? Who uses inter-stage transformers on a solid state amplifier anymore!
I don't remember the number on this cart. I do remmeber that it was all black with gold lettering and had a metal shield over the stylus similar to the model in the picture below.Man, that AR/Ortofon sounds like a badass setup! Which Ortofon? I have heard that some folks ran SPUs on ARs. SPUs are one of my "someday" carts.

Sweet!I don't remember the number on this cart. I do remmeber that it was all black with gold lettering and had a metal shield over the stylus similar to the model in the picture below.
View attachment 2294833
Yup, and I'm not going to go down this rat hole with you.
Would say that the majority of the people singing the praises of the AR table own more than one type of fairly high end to very high end table(s); so it’s definitely not hype
What motivation would they have to claim that an AR performance was on par or nearly on par with a high end table that they own?
Human nature would be to declare that their high dollar table with incredible specs blows away the “lowly AR”
VR
Andy

IMHO I would highly recommend doing a full restore of your AR table , I have had mine forever 4yrs now and as I have said many times before I will never part with it despite having table that cost more than twice what I paid for it.
My XA is not at all embarrassed next to my Nottingham Ace Spacedeck with Audiomods Series 6 arm and that is saying a lot as the Nottingham is an exceptional performer and although it is more refined than the XA the XA does not give up much as price might have you believe.
I will also say imo the the XA is my art piece table it is so stunning in its looks (imo) that even while playing my Nottingham I find myself starring at the XA’s beauty. The performance of my fully Marc Morin (Rest in Peace) Modified table is mind blowing and an absolute pleasure to listen to with any record. So with that said I would fully restore it and maybe do a custom plinth if that’s your thing. Here’s mine and good luck
View attachment 2293826
View attachment 2293866
Audiofreak71
Can you quantify exactly what was so good about the AR? What was the measured speed accuracy, W&F, rumble? Also, let's talk about the arm, IMO it wasn't that good. My Technics had a low mass straight arm, and it way out performed the AR in its ability to track a warped record.
