I have some comments on your survey:
1. Monitor - Critical Listening Monitoring means for the recording or mastering process, what percentage
of listeners do you think are doing this? Critical Listening might better go along with Casual Listening or background music
not sure what this question is looking to answer.
2. Musicality - Realism I see a musical speaker as providing realism so they are the same from my point of view. I would
put Analytical (linear frequency response and low distortion) at the other end of Musical. Poorly engineered might be another
possibility but I doubt anyone wants this though some might call particular models in this class musical. There are really good
and bad musical designs. Good musical designs, IMO are close to Analytical but deviate slightly for psychoacoustical optimizations.
4. Easy to Drive - Needs More Power I see easy to drive as an input impedance that is not too highly reactive or dips too low
in the magnitude of the impedance. Needs more power suggests an inefficient design, since a reactive load needs more current,
how much is more power, 50, 100, 200W? There are several ways to fix this.
PSB and perhaps Paradigm (are they still in business?) should be in your list of companies as value leaders.
Vandersteen might be of interest to you since their value speakers are, mostly, covered in cloth.
I read something here about "good drivers" it is possible to get excellent performance from not very costly or advanced drivers.
This is called value engineering, ask the question does adding money here significantly improve the audible performance of the
speaker as a system.
1. Monitor - Critical Listening Monitoring means for the recording or mastering process, what percentage
of listeners do you think are doing this? Critical Listening might better go along with Casual Listening or background music
not sure what this question is looking to answer.
2. Musicality - Realism I see a musical speaker as providing realism so they are the same from my point of view. I would
put Analytical (linear frequency response and low distortion) at the other end of Musical. Poorly engineered might be another
possibility but I doubt anyone wants this though some might call particular models in this class musical. There are really good
and bad musical designs. Good musical designs, IMO are close to Analytical but deviate slightly for psychoacoustical optimizations.
4. Easy to Drive - Needs More Power I see easy to drive as an input impedance that is not too highly reactive or dips too low
in the magnitude of the impedance. Needs more power suggests an inefficient design, since a reactive load needs more current,
how much is more power, 50, 100, 200W? There are several ways to fix this.
PSB and perhaps Paradigm (are they still in business?) should be in your list of companies as value leaders.
Vandersteen might be of interest to you since their value speakers are, mostly, covered in cloth.
I read something here about "good drivers" it is possible to get excellent performance from not very costly or advanced drivers.
This is called value engineering, ask the question does adding money here significantly improve the audible performance of the
speaker as a system.