scott 367

[frank75]

does anyone have any information about hh scott model 367 can not find any thing is a good reciever how many watts pe channnel ect. thanks frank

 

[frank75]

my new scott 367

o.k no one knows thats allright i picked it up away.gave it a good cleaning blew out all the dust in it everthing works accept the turning meter and need to some stuff to clean the swicthes sounds very nice i think:yes:

 

[mhardy6647]

Dunno. I have a 357 and it is quite decent. Low powered with excellent tuner sections.

The 357 is the receiver on the bottom in this old, bad photo.

 

[GuyNoir]

I bought numerous early Scott solid state pieces a few years back. I loved them, but in every instance, the caps went south within weeks or months of acquisition. Unless you have knowledge of the reciever having been recapped, it might be something to keep in mind.

Enjoy!:thmbsp:

 

[frank75]

i will keep that in mind. i know i'll be checking back with how to do that:sigh:thanks for the info if i get time today i'll put a picture up of her again thanks frank

 

[flyingscot]

I have one of these beauties too. I don't have much info., but, I think it's about 30-32 watts per channel RMS. I picked mine up on ebay a few years ago for about $15. I'm pretty sure it was their mid-range receiver around 1969-70.

 

[mhardy6647]

I have one of these beauties too. I don't have much info., but, I think it's about 30-32 watts per channel RMS. I picked mine up on ebay a few years ago for about $15. I'm pretty sure it was their mid-range receiver around 1969-70.

Sounds about right (power and place in the foodchain).

 

[tcdriver]

H. H. Scott Model 367

AM-Stereo FM design;
30 W/channel continuous sine-wave into 8Ω with both channels driven at 0.5% THD;
35 W/channel into 4Ω;
power bandwidth 25-20,000 Hz;
input sensitivity 2.5 & 5mV; mag. phono 500mV;
FM sensitivity 2.5µV for 30 dB quieting;
capture ratio 2.5 dB (IHF);
tape monitor;
18" X 5 ½ " X 12"D;
$259.90

 

[frank75]

it seems to be a good hard 30 watts pr channel.i don't have much now to compare it to just starting out. you guys know how that goes i have a kenwood kr-v6080 from the 90's and a little pioneer sx-v300 from 84 and lxi 965 that does not work? i think it sounds the best so far for what i know for now. it seems to have alot low end a lot of bass.p.s thanks for the additional info.frank