Sony SS-M7, SS-M9, SS-TL5 and TL6 owners might disagree.(But their speakers suck.)![]()
Sony SS-M7, SS-M9, SS-TL5 and TL6 owners might disagree.(But their speakers suck.)![]()
I own a STR 6055 and it has excellent sound,construction and looks. It is on duty at our maritime museum and playing whale sounds to the visitors. Is it the best? Damn straight it is!

Sony is often underrated. My 700ES cassette deck rivals my Nak's. And my TA-5650 V-FET amp is without equal. Good stuff. (But their speakers suck.)![]()
What Marantz piece is USA built??Depends on the Sony. In terms of Sony, TA-1120 and 1120-A, the STR-6120. that is what Sony could do without cost constraints. Those are Sony when they had something to prove, when they competed with USA built Marantz, and Mcintosh, and bought by those buyers as second or office systems. Before cost cut.
I had some vintage Sony loud speakers and yes they were a major disappointment. Also had no weight to them for being a big cabinet and 3-ways.Sony SS-M7, SS-M9, SS-TL5 and TL6 owners might disagree.
I wouldn't say ordinary. Very simple (compared to some) underatated elegance. A wood case and proper green lighting on the tuner dial and its beautiful. The ones I've seen lately were all original except for lamps and they all still worked well.Don't be lazy - I was able to highlight and copy the "Sony STR 6065" and post it within seconds, and saw multiple photos. It's fairly ordinary-looking...
![]()
I agree. They're a lot better looking in person. That whole line including the separates are some of Sony's best. I t3nd 59nlike the industrial look anyway.I wouldn't say ordinary. Very simple (compared to some) underatated elegance. A wood case and proper green lighting on the tuner dial and its beautiful. The ones I've seen lately were all original except for lamps and they all still worked well.
My 7065 showed a 9090db and a Marantz 2230 the door a few years back.
I totally agree with that.. many wouldn’t.
What Marantz piece is USA built??
Always liked the 50-80 wpc units the best ! small enough to be musical but large enough to drive most speakers !I totally agree with that.. many wouldn’t.
I never knew that. It kinda surprises me but then when you think of superscope and how it’s made by Marantz people it makes sense.Model 18 receiver, the early Solid State in 1968 and older, and the original tube Marantz equipment. Some post 1968 through early 1970's Marantz is also USA built like most Model 19 receivers, and high end separates through around 1970.
I’m realizing that myself. That does seem to be the sweet spot. I’m very tempted to hunt down this classic Sony receiver now.Always liked the 50-80 wpc units the best ! small enough to be musical but large enough to drive most speakers !
I never knew that. It kinda surprises me but then when you think of superscope and how it’s made by Marantz people it makes sense.
Before SuperScope, before the Model 10B FM tuner, there was the Marantz Company in Woodside, NY. The Model 10 and 10B FM tuner lost money for the company on every example built (should have sold for at least $1100-$1200 to recoup this).
This forced Saul Marantz in 1964 to sell his company to SuperScope, Inc. From 1964-1968, the Marantz Company continued as "The Best Available Without Regard For Price Point" the only equal competitor to McIntosh Laboratory, Inc.
In 1968, SuperScope began broadening the Marantz Brand to more people, and Japanese manufactured gear began being offered (made by Standard Radio of Japan, who became Marantz Japan). Under $300 was the entry point to Marantz in 1968. Some history for you.