Wow, I never meant to start all this. I just think idler-wheels don't measure up to belt- or direct-drives, not even close. That's just me, I guess, although I think the specifications for wow and flutter, hum, and rumble (for example) would back me up (show me the best idler wheel TT specs vs. a belt or DD TT, ok?) The light platters, the fact that all the cheap-o console, and close-n-play, turntables, were all idler-wheels back in the day, I don't know. I had a Dual. Probably a 1229, or 1225 (as I recall, I forget about the past easily and didn't document any of my old stuff), not sure about the accuracy of a model No., I do know that it had the changer attachment (great for stacking LP's)... I sold it, at a loss. I just didn't think it was all that great a TT. Not bashing, it's just that most belt-drive or DD TT's, regardless of price, can run circles around even the best of the idler-wheels, so why bother with anything else but belt or direct drive? I also prefer a nice, thick, heavy platter, aesthetically. My opinion, my preference, my taste; not bashing, or trolling.
it's just that most belt-drive or DD TT's, regardless of price, can run circles around even the best of the idler-wheels, so why bother with anything else but belt or direct drive?
For example, my Technics SL-3200, by all means an entry level (or close to it) semi-auto DD TT, spec. sheet showing.
Have listened to a Dual 1229 and it blew me away! This thread is dumb.
I can see your passion for what you want to see. And how you may choose to quote me selectively, take my posts out of context, or twist what I said, or whatever. OK let's try to make it objective, and peaceful, without bashing, attacking, mis-judging, etc. Show me/us the best idler-wheel TT
specs you can muster, anywhere, regardless of price; post them here, on this thread, please. And then let's take a look at some 'common' belt-drive and direct-drive TT specs from the ages, posted here, in comparison. Nothing personal, no bashing, no twisting, no selective quotes, just real facts. Please post, the idler-wheel best, thank you, sir.
Try listening to a Garrard 301, Thorens 124, Lenco L75 or Rek O Kut B12H with a decent arm/cartridge mounted in a nice heavy solid plinth. It'll blow away any of your cheaply made 70's Belt/DD junk by a mile. Why do you think these same turntables are as highly regarded as they are today? It;s because they deliver a moving listening experience with tons of PRAT that most turntables can only hope to acheive!
Hey, hey, hey!!!!
How about American made broadcast stuff? Russco, QRK, Harris etc.....![]()
Wow, I never meant to start all this. I just think idler-wheels don't measure up to belt- or direct-drives, not even close. That's just me, I guess, although I think the specifications for wow and flutter, hum, and rumble (for example) would back me up (show me the best idler wheel TT specs vs. a belt or DD TT, ok?) The light platters, the fact that all the cheap-o console, and close-n-play, turntables, were all idler-wheels back in the day, I don't know. I had a Dual. Probably a 1229, or 1225 (as I recall, I forget about the past easily and didn't document any of my old stuff), not sure about the accuracy of a model No., I do know that it had the changer attachment (great for stacking LP's)... I sold it, at a loss. I just didn't think it was all that great a TT. Not bashing, it's just that most belt-drive or DD TT's, regardless of price, can run circles around even the best of the idler-wheels, so why bother with anything else but belt or direct drive? I also prefer a nice, thick, heavy platter, aesthetically. My opinion, my preference, my taste; not bashing, or trolling.
Have listened to a Dual 1229 and it blew me away! This thread is dumb.

but, consider the fact, that an idler wheel's drive is tied to a rubber disc, that is subject to contracting and expanding, with temperature, or even other climactic factors, and that alone would dictate that playback performance is going to be inconsistent and unpredictable.