• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Star Treks worth avoiding......

Star Trek: Discovery had an episode in the Mirror Universe!
 
Star Trek: Discovery started out very badly. The story was all over the place. Due to limitations on copyright the Klingons had to not look like Klingons. The tech in Discovery was also way above par for it to be a prequel of TOS. A lot wrong with the show in general with too many points to mention. That all being said, I felt they really stepped up their game for the 3rd season. It's amazing what you can do when you're facing being cancelled. All of a sudden, the show had a clear focus and a mission. Characters were developed better, and people weren't being pulled back from the dead out of the ether of the fungi network. The 3 rd season ended on a positive note, and I pray they make it a bit more episodic for the next season.
 
I do have a favorite series of star trek. Now, let me see, which one would that be.....

Of all the series and films, there are three films I didn't like at all and these were the three JJ Abrams produced ones.
 
To me TOG and TNG were the high points and everything else was very meh! Picard was ok in places. In general I go in on any Star Trek or Star Wars shows with a lot of skepticism though the Mandolorian was a nice surprise. Hard to catch lightning in a bottle twice I guess.
 
TNG was boring. Picard put me to sleep; this captain lacked charisma, and walked and talked like he had a large stick up his a$$. Some notably bad episodes: 1001001, A Fist Full of Datas, The Offspring, and Manage 'a Troi.

Now Star Trek: Picard is a whole lot different. He is now presented as a man who has some big defects; broken by the Federation because he couldn't maintain his impossible standards for what is right. He has now learned a hard lesson that sometimes you have to be a bit of a pirate to get things done. I like *this* Picard :)
 
Mixed bag for me for all of the Star Trek iterations.

TOS has the most iconic episodes, once TNG found its groove there were some really good episodes and mini-arcs, DS9 kinda meandered until it went story arc (hmm..where did that come from?), Voyager was a mixed bag from really weak to pretty compelling episodes. I fell off the wagon with Discovery - the vibe felt wrong (quoting Scotty: Aye, it was an emotional statement, I don't expect you to understand it).

I have been watching Discovery re-runs on H&I channel, sometimes I make it thru, most times I drift off.
 
*As for lame episodes, Spock’s Brain, anyone?
I like it. Sure, simplified to silliness like so many episodes, but there's multiple technologies in there we're trying to achieve today, so it was certainly predictive. And what kid hasn't wished they could avoid school by just cramming info into their brain somehow?
 
Call me a crabby old luddite but TOS is the only one that really still has a place in my heart.
I was 11 years old and it had a time slot here of 10:30pm on a Sunday night - the death slot. I would go to bed at 9pm on that night and either my mom or dad would wake me up at 10:30 after the news and before they went to bed and I would sit transfixed in front of my dad's "...forerunner of the RCA XL100" (his words) every Sunday night and go where no man has gone before.
 
I like it. Sure, simplified to silliness like so many episodes, but there's multiple technologies in there we're trying to achieve today, so it was certainly predictive. And what kid hasn't wished they could avoid school by just cramming info into their brain somehow?
This episode gave us truisms that will endure....The givers of pain and delight.

As a kid in the 60's - mere lines. Now - word, dude.
 
I like it. Sure, simplified to silliness like so many episodes, but there's multiple technologies in there we're trying to achieve today, so it was certainly predictive. And what kid hasn't wished they could avoid school by just cramming info into their brain somehow?

I am aware of what science fiction is. However, Spock’s Brain was not a good example of the genre.
 
I like all of the older ones. Haven't watched the Picard ones, as Stewart is a jackass. However, my favorite series is the animated Lower Decks series. Funny as all get out.
 
Wife and I are Star Trek people, and have watched all of them.

Enterprise is at the bottom, although in fairness the movie Star Trek V was as bad.

Wife likes DSP9 the best, my preference is Voyager.

Now as bad as Enterprise is, well once you watch Firefly or Andromeda, you have not seen bad.

Now The Expanse, that is good sci fi.
I also like the reboot of Battlestar Galactica.
 
Last edited:
I suppose I'm a fan of all things Trek. I've even watched the documentaries. That's not to say I don't think there was some really bad Trek stuff. Certainly some of those season 3 TOS episodes were horrendous. But they're still watchable - like B movie train wrecks. Kirk playing a woman who has swapped bodies with him. Shatner's acting is pretty funny. Spock's brain. Love the mechanical sounds when McCoy remote controls his movements. Of course, the children chanting in a circle to call "the angel." But sometimes you need a laugh that doesn't involve tribbles. I think Discovery kind of righted itself before capsizing.we shall see if it stays on course. Picard I am invested in. I don't even care so much about the deeper story. I'm happy with the action factor and nostalgia.
 
Star Trek has certainly been a roller-coaster of ups and downs over the years. I have mixed opinions on some things but I'm a big fan overall, especially trek from the TNG-DS9-VOY era. I'll give some of my opinions on each series, in case anyone cares.

Enterprise (since it's the topic of this thread) - I hated the concept from the very beginning, because it largely represented the end of the unbroken, forward progressing line of continuity that had existed from TOS, through the TOS movies, and TNG (and TNG movies), DS9, and Voyager. The only exception being Nemesis, a TNG movie that came out while Enterprise was on the air. With that much existing continuity (everything from TOS, TNG, DS9, Voyager, and related movies), the idea of doing a prequel was insane. They boxed themselves into a corner because if anything truly exciting happened, it would immediately raise the question of why no one ever talked about these events in the future... At first they mostly tried to stay within the bounds of existing continuity (what had already been established in other series and movies) but the series was pretty boring. Later they brought in the Xindi and the Temporal Cold War, etc which was definitely treading on "how come none of this was mentioned in the future?" territory.

I didn't have any issue with Scott Bakula. Actually, I thought he was possibly the best cast person on the entire show and I thought he made a great captain - to the extent that he wasn't handicapped by bad writing. On the other hand the rest of the cast was pretty bad. You had Jolene Blalock who was just the token babe with zero acting ability playing a character that had zero depth or intrigue. The obviousness of the one and only reason why her character was on the show was cringe-worthy. Every other character was mostly boring and/or stereotypical. The fake and forced friendship between the helm and operations officers. The over-acting doctor. Everyone else, mostly forgettable.

The last episode of Enterprise was REALLY dumb. The idea of doing some kind of TNG holodeck flashback wasn't what bothered me as much as it was the fact that they tried to pretend that this occurred during the TNG series, on the Enterprise-D, wearing those era uniforms, despite the fact that the cast members had clearly aged beyond that. It was pretty cringe-worthy, and you can tell that even the actors themselves thought that it was stupid. They could have simply used the newer grey uniforms and had it take place on the Enterprise-E instead of trying to pretend that it was ~1994 again.

TOS (The original series) - I thought it was okay. I can see how it was groundbreaking for it's time. I grew up watching TNG/DS9/Voyager though, as well as the TOS movies, but I didn't actually watch the three seasons of TOS until later. I think this show is probably better if you watched it during it's prime and you have some built-up nostalgia. Watching it for the first time in the 21st century though, I thought that there were many parts where it had not aged very well, and were almost painful to watch. Still, I have a deep appreciation for the example that it set, and the fact that it's continuity was continued unbroken into the TNG/DS9/VOY era.

TNG - Probably my favorite Star Trek series. Season 1 was a little rough. Great cast, great charisma between cast members, and good writing overall. Also, I love all the fantastic guest stars they had over the years, with many people including Bob Gunton, Ronny Cox, and even Kelsey Grammer having the chance to play captains at certain points. Biggest downside of TNG, IMO, is that it is the series that created the "mirror universe". I simply hate the entire "mirror universe" concept and pretty much every single "mirror universe" episode is absolutely terrible. Also, while I liked the character of Data a lot, I think there was a bit too much focus on that character, at the expense of others.

DS9 - I liked this a lot also. More edgy than TNG, that's for sure. For me the show hits it's stride in Seasons 4-6. Then all of a sudden toward the very end of season 6 and much of Season 7 things just go downhill. There is still a lot of good in Season 7, but it feels almost like driving down a road with huge pot-holes in it after you just got off the freeway...

Ezri Dax- I did not like Jadzia being killed off, but introducing this new character for season 7 was just terrible. Here we are, the last season of the show, in the middle of the dominion war, where we still have tons of unfinished arcs from the first 6 seasons of DS9, and in some cases even arcs from TNG (Gowron, Worf, O'Brien, etc) that need to be wrapped up. Instead, part of every episode (Ezri was in EVERY season 7 episode) and in several cases entire episodes were wasted introducing this useless, obnoxious, annoying new character. I would have loved to have simply given other cast members like Martok, Garak, Nog, Rom or others more screen time instead. I get that they needed a certain minimum of female cast members though - only legit reason I've ever heard. Maybe they should have simply made Leeta a main cast member somehow? Could not have been any worse than Ezri.

Vic Fontaine- WTF? I don't know about you, but it's pretty lame to watch Sci-Fi about a 24th century space-station in the middle of an intergalactic war only to be forced to constantly indulge what was obviously one of the writers obsessions with early-mid 20th century Jazz music. Every time he is on screen we have to sit through what seems like an entire 5 minute song, I guess because he is just so amazing :rolleyes:

Kira and Odo- This just never came off as natural for me, and in most cases sort of made me cringe. I think part of it is because Odo always gave me that humble grandpa-style vibe, and that isn't the sort of character that works well for making-out on-screen all the time. Maybe it's also because the actors never really thought it was a good idea either and you could always sort of tell via their acting.

Dukat religion- I liked Dukat a lot more earlier in the series when he was a more complex character that even had a bit of good in him. When he devolved into a much more simplistic, almost stereotypical, evil religious bad guy, the character just wasn't as interesting anymore IMO.

Klingons- I was a bit annoyed that they took a year-long break from the Dominion War story to focus on Klingons instead - to tie in when they brought Worf onto the show. Although they did eventually wrap the Klingon arc into the overall Dominion War Arc, it just seemed like an unnecessary season-long detour.

Mirror universe- This was only one episode thankfully, but one too many. I hate the entire mirror universe concept, particularly the way they shoe-horn in "mirror-universe" things from the regular universe regardless of any logic. The mirror-universe certainly is not unique to season 7, but it is another wasted episode that should have been used to help wrap up the series.

Voyager - I liked this show a lot overall. I thought it was slightly annoying when they introduced 7 of 9 as the token "borg babe", but they actually did a good job writing for her character and she did a good job acting (unlike Jolene "botox-lips" Blalock). I thought Janeway was a good captain, and Kate Mulgrew did a good job acting. Chakotay's character was a bit shallow. Kes was annoying and I was glad when she was gone.

My biggest gripe with Voyager was how it ended. The show spent 7 years setting the stage for what would happen when they get home. Yet instead of getting any resolution whatsoever to any of those questions, the show literally ends instantly once they get home.

Would the EMH remain as a respected crew member and friend or would he simply be deactivated/replaced? We even had a Star Trek episode where they tried to introduce some sort of "all of the old EMH programs have become slaves" narrative, yet we never get to see what happens to the Voyager EMH. This lack of resolution becomes an even bigger deal once you see the direction they went in "Picard" where artificial life forms were banned. Does that mean the doctor was deactivated / banned?

A bunch of the crew are former members of the Maquis. Would they be able to retain the same ranks they were given on Voyager? Would they face any prosecution due to their former roles in the Maquis? This isn't just some side plot, it was one of the main plots on the show and we did not get any resolution whatsoever.

There are countless more examples.

I would have liked to see Voyager get home maybe 1-3 episodes before the series ended. Have the last few episodes take place in the Alpha quadrant. Maybe the Borg followed them home and then they have to work with Starfleet to stop them. Or maybe an episode like "Family" which came right after "Best of Both Worlds" on TNG. Really any ending would be better than what we got. The show was about the crew, not the Delta quadrant. In it's current incarnation it feels like reading a book with the last few pages torn out.

Discovery - I have not watched any of this yet. Frankly, the entire concept of an animated Star Trek series seems extremely dumb and so far I have not been able to get over that hump. Maybe some day I will force myself to watch it.

Picard - I have very mixed feelings about this, but more negative than positive. First and foremost, it just really does not have the "feel" of a star-trek series.

-The show is way too serialized, to the point where it feels more like one long movie that was simply chopped into hour-long segments. I'm glad that I binge-watched the entire first season at once, because I don't think I could have handled waiting a week between episodes with that level of obnoxious serialization. I remember people criticizing DS9 for becoming semi-serialized during the Dominion-war arc, but they at least still made an effort to give each individual episode it's own little sub-plot. "Picard" doesn't even try.

-What Genre is this supposed to even be? "Picard" felt like it was trying to be some kind of weird action/horror/thriller instead of a Sci-Fi show. They repeatedly brought back old characters simply to turn around and kill them off. They seriously brought back the character of Icheb (one of the borg kids from Voyager) JUST so that we could watch a 5-second video of him getting his eyeball graphically ripped out of his skull?!? VERY lame. The character of Hugh was probably the best part of the entire first season. The actor did a fantasic job of portraying hugh and I think even portrayed it better than he did in TNG. But then, of course, they kill Hugh off... :rolleyes:. And then we get the mandatory ninja-fighting scenes, characters cussing and doing drugs, etc, as opposed to actual compelling story.

Roddenberry-era Star Trek was about showing what humanity could achieve, and maintained a largely optimistic and positive view of the future. "Picard" on the other hand goes out of it's way to depict a very dark and dystopian future where the flaws of society and the flaws of every individual character take front stage. Even when they brought back Riker and Troi, they couldn't allow that happy nostalgic moment to exist without shoe-horning in some depressing back-story about them having had a kid that died :rolleyes:

What happened to Dr. Crusher? By the end of TNG they had practically set Picard and Crusher up to eventually become a couple, and in the last episode, "All Good Things", when they depicted the future, they were actually married. Then in "Picard", we get no mention of her whatsoever.... umm ok.

-Why did they obsessively need to re-design everything? Every computer interface apparently has to be some cheesy holographic interface now. Aside from the 1701-D flashbacks, we don't see a single "old" federation starship in the entire series. Are we to believe that every ship that existing during the TNG/DS9/Voyager time has now been retired? In the scene near the end where Riker and the fleet show up, every ship in the fleet was exactly the same, some boring new ship design.

The whole premise of a "rag-tag" bunch of losers on some small crusty little ship just makes the show feel like it's trying to be some kind of firefly knock-off.

Hopefully the new seasons take a different direction that is more like what you would expect from Star Trek and less like a bad Robocop sequel.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom