Dr. Morbius
I.N.T.E.R.O.C.I.T.O.R.
Could I do this with a couple of velvet Elvis paintings?
Could I do this with a couple of velvet Elvis paintings?
I have always thought that a good full range speaker should have the sub incorporated into it's design.
What if the positioning of the mains excites a room mode (and it almost certainly will)? The way I see it (better yet, the way physics enables me to see it) you're pretty much screwed unless you have DRC to make the necessary corrections. :scratch2:
I just finished building a pair of Dayton 15" Reference HO subwoofers in 3.0 cuft knockdown cabinets. This is new territory for me and I'm not a big fan of "dicking around" as has been previously stated by another poster.
It looks like this unit would streamline and simplify things quite a bit.
Does positioning of subs become irrelevant when you get the Dsp cinema?
Sent from my X10a using Tapatalk 2
I wouldn't say irrelevant, but it's much, much less of an issue. I think a pair, positioned where they sound best without DRC, will require the unit to cut the loudest frequencies less to match the weakest frequencies, thereby requiring less gain to bring the sub output to where it matches the mains...because after the unit is done running the test tones and makes its corrections the sub(s)output will be lower. How much lower is dictated by how deep the null is at the weakest frequency. In my case the subs weren't much quieter than before, but I have floor to ceiling bass traps in all five corners of my space and didn't have any severe nulls to begin with. Next I'll try removing some bass traps to see how capable the unit is at creating a balanced response without the aid of bass traps. I feel like it should still be able to balance it out, just not sure how much gain I'll have to use to get sub output where I need it. Having a pair helps...and use such a small amount of gain as it is I have a hell of a lot of headroom there to play with.
When I was 18 I really got into subs. Big time. I loved it. But... for me, the surface fleet was really where I learned my profession.![]()
Subs for stereos? I do understand why folks like them. I got one for my wife's family room stereo/home theater system, sounds great when used correctly.
For my personal stereo system... I'm not very hot on the them, or the idea of using one. I prefer 2 floorstanding vintage 'big box' speakers... let the woofers do all the work. Sounds right as rain to me. I'm a vintage guy.
Maybe I'll use one someday... but not any time very soon. I don't fear subs... I really see, or hear, no need for one. Sounds fine 'as is' without one.
But with all these smaller speakers they have now-a-days, on speaker stands... I guess they are not only necessary but a requirement. If you have volume speakers with 12 inch woofers, preferably AlNiCo, that's all you need. Plenty of base.
I do also have a pair of 1970 - 23" high box speakers with 10" AlNiCo woofers (with a tweet)... and STILL plenty of base. I think it's just the newer speaker systems that just don't cut it, maybe? Like they must have a sub woofer or something. Don't know much about the new stuff.
Disappointed... I thought there would be Oriental carpet attached. ;-)
2. DB isn't just about achieving deeper bass. It's about OPTIMISING the bass.
Why is this such a difficult concept for so many people to grasp? No matter how many times, no matter how many ways distributed bass or even augmenting bass via one sub is explained someone comes back stating my speakers already go low enough I don't need any subs. Then the whole concept gets explained once again, and once again it flies right over the heads of so many.

Why is this such a difficult concept for so many people to grasp? No matter how many times, no matter how many ways distributed bass or even augmenting bass via one sub is explained someone comes back stating my speakers already go low enough I don't need any subs. Then the whole concept gets explained once again, and once again it flies right over the heads of so many.
I get that some people prefer not to use a sub or multiple subs. It can be a pain in the butt and an added expense. But I don't understand why such a simple concept is misunderstood. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, especially in the audio toolbox, and I understand it. We are talking about quality not quantity and quality is what we all seem to strive for.
cubdog
But with all these smaller speakers they have now-a-days, high on speaker stands... I guess they are not only necessary but a requirement.
Correct. Alnico will compress at higher volumes also. A lot of guitar players prefer this compressed sound and will opt for alnico based speakers in their cabinets.1. Anico doesn't provide deeper bass than ferrite etc.
Kind of sums it up. People are flawed creatures with fragile egos that don't like having their paradigms challenged. Nor their PSBs.I can think of a few reasons:
1. They refuse to accept that their speakers of pride and joy are INCAPABLE of achieving optimal bass playback no matter what.
2. They have this interesting attitude that they do not require much bass for their music listening.
3. Some seemingly consider that somehow good bass is HARMFUL to their music listening because they think their musical taste is so refined & sophisticated.
4. Conservatism.
5. Lazy yet too proud to accept the simple scientific fact.
Oh man, oh man! I just read the user manual PDF for the Anti-Mode 8033 cinema & Anti-Mode 8033S-II. It appears I would have to get a different model to dial in either two mono or two stereo subs. Next spring/summer I plan to assemble two more (biggerGeez, cut me some slack. I'm still trying to cook up a tasty quip to Dr M's velvet Elvis comment. :scratch2: :sigh:
He needs to just build the damn thing so we can all marvel at its awesomeness. :ntwrthy:
What if the positioning of the mains excites a room mode (and it almost certainly will)? The way I see it (better yet, the way physics enables me to see it) you're pretty much screwed unless you have DRC to make the necessary corrections. :scratch2: